Poll

Will you pay attention to old claims?

Yes, and I will carry my grudges forward too!
Yes, and I will work with a clean slate on relations.
No, never did care, land is free! Enemies are still enemies!
No, and I will work with a clean slate for relations.
I'm a cute bitch.

Author Topic: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?  (Read 8429 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #75 on: September 11, 2011, 07:42:25 pm »
0
In theory, seven days from when the freeze was announced, assuming that some stupid moron does not delay it by creating a big mess for the devs to fix (like all the scams lately).
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #76 on: September 11, 2011, 07:43:59 pm »
0
That's my point, the entire war was a silly clusterfuck and nobody really seemed to have their shit together. In the battles VRN fought we lost something like 900 of our troops against 1600 of yours (plus about 400 ill-equipped villagers we had captured pretty much for free), but that didn't really mean much in the end. That's why I think it's funny that you guys keep making such a big deal out of it -- a bunch of the clans supposedly involved didn't actually do anything. For our part, the only clan we were ever allied with were the Sea Raiders, and I can tell you right now that this loosely-knit coalition where each clan had different goals and many just deserted rather than fighting was absolutely nothing like the mega-alliance in the west.

more words

I think you need to give the full story there, because I am sure hacking something to do with the fact we lost that battle rather than VRN SUPREME BATTLE TACTICS. Every clan, including VRN, in the Coalition of the Not So Honorable™ got destroyed or were made moot. It's also funny you say you only had semi relations with one clan despite the fact you weren't and then you claim Risen/Bashi/LEgio are in a mage alliance when they same the same thing.

In other words, you lost to the absolute worst clan in the game, with 8 other clans helping you, and you are still trying to make excuses why you did.

As for Risen/Bashi/Legio, A++ transaction would buy work with from again.

Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #77 on: September 11, 2011, 07:47:14 pm »
+1
I think you need to give the full story there, because I am sure hacking something to do with the fact we lost that battle rather than VRN SUPREME BATTLE TACTICS. Every clan, including VRN, in the Coalition of the Not So Honorable™ got destroyed or were made moot. It's also funny you say you only had semi relations with one clan despite the fact you weren't and then you claim Risen/Bashi/LEgio are in a mage alliance when they same the same thing.

In other words, you lost to the absolute worst clan in the game, with 8 other clans helping you, and you are still trying to make excuses why you did.

As for Risen/Bashi/Legio, A++ transaction would buy work with from again.
Wut? Is that some sort of... american rating thingie? Please educate me about this...
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #78 on: September 11, 2011, 07:56:19 pm »
0
Wut? Is that some sort of... american rating thingie? Please educate me about this...

Haha yeah sorry, its an ebay thing when rating someone's transaction.
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #79 on: September 11, 2011, 07:58:13 pm »
+1
Wut? Is that some sort of... american rating thingie? Please educate me about this...

A++ is a mockery of the A+ score in school (97% or higher marks), basically saying it was better then perfect, similar to other idiotic sayings like "I'll give 110% effort!"

Also, eBay apparently uses it.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Jacko

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 99
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Mappers Guild
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fffnanguard!
  • Game nicks: Jacko
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #80 on: September 11, 2011, 08:02:50 pm »
0
Also, America is only AA- nowadays.
Monkeys!

Offline Slantedfloors

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 135
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LLJK
  • Game nicks: LLJK_Slanted
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #81 on: September 11, 2011, 08:03:22 pm »
+2
Slanted. Why are you having a conversation with a guy who knows jack shit about what's going on?
Quite frankly, I don't know why I try to have any conversations on these forums at all. It's always like trying to talk to a heavily-sedated brick wall.

Offline Smoothrich

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1558
  • Infamy: 986
  • cRPG Player
  • #manup @bigplays
    • View Profile
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #82 on: September 11, 2011, 09:09:52 pm »
0
Hypocracy my friend.


And, also oh noes NWO BRO.

It makes sense, this guy was in Acre who LLJK annihilated with barely any casualties in one of the first wars in the game.  Then he joined Byzantium, who LLJK also annihilated with help from our Legio/Bashi/Risen bros.  LLJK fought a fief attack in shogunate lands, on EU server, with half LLJK players and half EU mercs of our friendly clans, and we beat shogunate killing about 300 more tickets then we lost.  It was a nice hilly field battle too so it was all about Superior Goon Tactics (strong EU archers, Bashibazouk flanking berserkers, LLJK cav, hilariously fragile LLJK infantry in the middle that constantly baited shogunate into reckless charges by dying and falling back PURPOSELY getting Shogunate overextended and outflanked).  That was one of my favorite LLJK strategus fights as it was a very pitched battle, but their bonzai charges and Inferior Weeabo Tactics were no match.

And yes, you can't even pretend that ATS and Shogunate didn't go to every clan's teamspeak and vent that played the game in order to foster a great alliance to eliminate LLJK immediately from Strategus within the first 2 weeks, because we "didn't take the game seriously enough"  and "liked to have fun."  Really, this was the Casus belli for the first gigantic alliance in the game to form.  How embarrassing for all participants of that little cabal.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2011, 09:10:53 pm by Smoothrich »
My posting is like a katana folded 1000 times to perfection.. and the community is what keeps the edge sharp.. and bloody.  -  Me.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Slantedfloors

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 135
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LLJK
  • Game nicks: LLJK_Slanted
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #83 on: September 11, 2011, 09:17:53 pm »
0
That was one of my favorite LLJK strategus fights as it was a very pitched battle, but their bonzai charges and Inferior Weeabo Tactics were no match.
It really cannot be stated how funny that battle was. They charged directly into a killbox like fifteen times. Usually our teamspeak is pretty reserved during battles, but we were laughing our asses off during that one.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2011, 09:18:59 pm by Slantedfloors »

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #84 on: September 11, 2011, 09:18:54 pm »
+1
I think LLJK do so well because they don't take themselves seriously... :lol:

But what do I know? Nothin! That is what!
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline SPQR

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 121
  • Infamy: 19
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CSA
  • Game nicks: CSA_Gen_Robert_E_Leet
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #85 on: September 11, 2011, 10:13:33 pm »
0
I think LLJK do so well because they don't take themselves seriously... :lol:

But what do I know? Nothin! That is what!

This is the key to strategus. It's just RISK: My Little Pony Edition

Taking it any more seriously than that is a fast way to burn yourself out
"It is well that war is so terrible - otherwise we would grow to fondle it." - Robert E Leet

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline PhantomZero

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 384
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm going to need you playing at 6AM on Saturday..
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BIRD CLAN
  • Game nicks: POSTMASTER_PHANTOM0_OF_BIRD
  • IRC nick: PhantomZero
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #86 on: September 11, 2011, 10:33:24 pm »
+1
This is the key to strategus. It's just RISK: My Little Pony Edition

Taking it any more seriously than that is a fast way to burn yourself out

I don't know about you mister, but I take my RISK very seriously. If I start to lose I just flip the board over and call the other players bundle of stickss for allying against me and how horribly unfair that is.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #87 on: September 11, 2011, 10:36:41 pm »
0
I don't know about you mister, but I take my RISK very seriously. If I start to lose I just flip the board over and call the other players bundle of stickss for allying against me and how horribly unfair that is.
You are gonna love this:
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/105134/risk-legacy

Here's an article:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/112543-Risk-Legacy-Makes-Your-Board-Game-Decisions-Matter
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Renegat

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 105
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #88 on: September 11, 2011, 10:39:26 pm »
0
Wow, so many poeple speak about my dear clan here :s

-We are arrogant and we said everywhere that we're far better than LLJK, risen, ect ... ?
Who posted a thread to congratulate risen-bashi-legio coalition? George, who's a byzantium. Of course, the good members of risen/bashi/legio roted this topic with insults and other kind messages ...
Some days after, the very mature thovex opened a new thread to congratulate himself about his great victory against us, and again this topic was only about trolling and insult against byzantium.
So who was really arrogant in here?

-We made a huge coalition against LLJK and risen/bashi/... and there was much more players in our coalition than in LLJK+legio+bashi+risen?
LOL?
First, in every battle i did, there was byzantium and pillagers, and some other players from various clans. But i didn't see any other clan participate in battles. I mean, there was no searaiders/templars/... with us ... And even if they were with us.
And plus, how dare you comparing templars (for exemple) and risen or LLJK? Their is, by far, more players in LLJK (for exemple) than in templars ... So please, stop saying that you fought literally alone against a huge coalition ;)


So, as many poeple are sharing their view about strategus on this topic, i ll give you mine :
For me, strategus would be realy good if their were not those 2 problems :
First, strategus seems to be all about the number of players in a clan. I mean, the best clan, so the one which will have the highest number of fief, will ever be the one which have the highest number of players. Of course, the number of player should be an important fact, but it should not be all about this fact. But also about general strategy, tactic, skills of clan members, ect (please don't say me that it's already the case, we all know that's not true).
Plus, a even more annoying problem, i couldn't participated to most battles because those battles was at 00h00, 01h, 02h, or 04h am.
Indeed, i actually have a life, i ve to wake up early (and i think it's the same for most of average crpg players) so i couldn't participate to those battles (which were by the way very important).. For exemple, most of the time, when our villages were attacked, it was not at 18h00 or 19h00, but at 00h00, 1h, or even 2h. So strategus would be fun if i could particpate to all battles which are concerning my clan and not only one or two because the rest are at stupid hours.

Notice, i managed to not insult or deride risen/bashi/legio/lljk despite i'm a bad arrogant byzantium ! (i'm certainly an exception !)

And sorry if i did grammar mistake, i'm only a poor french :(
« Last Edit: September 11, 2011, 10:45:30 pm by Renegat »

Offline Renegat

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 105
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
« Reply #89 on: September 11, 2011, 10:44:51 pm »
0
Sorry, error x)