Author Topic: War of the Roses  (Read 14823 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ninja_Khorin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1067
  • Infamy: 90
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Zen
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan Ninja
  • Game nicks: Khorin/Keyoke/Lujan
  • IRC nick: Khorin
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #75 on: January 21, 2012, 11:13:54 pm »
0
Hahaha, love you Khorin, that joke never gets old.
:D

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #76 on: January 22, 2012, 01:34:52 am »
0
Warband is casual, c-rpg is "grind till it becomes casual". Everyone learn this combat system after some time, it really isn't that special as most people think.

Oberyn agreeing with Leshma's post and giving him a +1 ? Now I've seen it all.
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 765
  • Infamy: 124
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #77 on: January 22, 2012, 01:53:15 am »
+1
Well Oberyn and me agree on many things, it's just that he thinks that I'm a dumbass :D

Offline indigocylinder

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 38
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #78 on: January 22, 2012, 04:49:37 am »
0
Warband's melee combat system really is a thing of beauty, like an infinite fractal that reveals more and more detail the deeper you go.

I'm sceptical that any of these next generation games will capture that. Still, I'm interested to see what they do with mountain blade 2, and I'll probably end up buying the others as well anyway.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #79 on: January 22, 2012, 10:01:46 pm »
0
That arrow in the picture looks a tad too long

does anyone else agree?

Never complained in crpg  :P

(click to show/hide)

Offline Kato

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 227
  • Infamy: 37
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #80 on: January 22, 2012, 11:51:06 pm »
0
They will support only 32 players in multi. :|
Hope they will increase it at least up to 64 after some optimization.
Also from interviews seems it will be more casual than warband.

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #81 on: January 23, 2012, 07:31:45 am »
0
32 player... :(

Well, still looking forward to it, it might still be fun even if it's less complicated gameplay.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #82 on: January 23, 2012, 12:45:31 pm »
0
Someone will figure out how to increase the server size. It's always done eventually with most games.

Offline Leesin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1009
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Leesin
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #83 on: January 23, 2012, 01:40:08 pm »
0
Erm wasn't Warband advertised to be like 64 player? yet we're all sitting on 120 player servers, lol. Even some 200+ player servers. It wouldn't surprise me if we could do the same on War of the Roses.

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #84 on: January 23, 2012, 02:37:57 pm »
0
Erm wasn't Warband advertised to be like 64 player? yet we're all sitting on 120 player servers, lol. Even some 200+ player servers. It wouldn't surprise me if we could do the same on War of the Roses.

250 players was easilly possible, as shown by Mount & Gladius yesterday.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Majer

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
  • Behold!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Majer_The_Grey
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #85 on: January 23, 2012, 10:13:46 pm »
0
I wonder if in like 10 years we will have battles with 2500 players involved.

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #86 on: January 23, 2012, 10:31:08 pm »
0
I wonder if in like 10 years we will have battles with 2500 players involved.

Can't see why not, many things improved the last 10 year in the gaming industry.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #87 on: January 23, 2012, 11:13:07 pm »
0
250 players was easilly possible, as shown by Mount & Gladius yesterday.
Like some epic event involving roman tactics and stuff? Any videos of this?

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2534
  • Infamy: 483
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile