Author Topic: War of the Roses  (Read 14213 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #60 on: November 28, 2011, 05:45:33 pm »
0
They have something we don't. Guess what?

An actual model for weapon rack that doesnt look like a midget's coffin? HAH

Offline B3RS3RK

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 377
  • Infamy: 103
  • cRPG Player
  • Sexy and I know it.
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Saracen_Berserkaziz_Amir
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #61 on: November 28, 2011, 05:50:47 pm »
0
Nice Graphics, only looks a bit crappy imo with the swords, they are so fucking big haha looks almost like an Anmie.
Maybe it woud be better for me to find out where you life and kill you when you are satch a Soziopath. You have enough now.
"I don´t believe in anything, I´m just here for the violence."

Offline Kato

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 227
  • Infamy: 37
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #62 on: November 29, 2011, 02:32:19 am »
0
Next year will be great for mediaval combat games.

1.Age of Chivalry - It can be fun multiplayer game, some different combat experinace from mount and blade. Hope beta start early next year.

2. War of Roses - multiplayer cheeky copy of warband which paradox want to sell as AAA game with solid graphics, some sort of character proggresion, unlocking new equipment, singleplayer only as tutorial, and no mods before they sell few dlc. :? From interviews it seems that Q2 as realise date on paradox site is unrealistisc, better hope for december 2012. They will probably have hard time create lagfree netcode for epic multiplayer battles, actualy talowords did solid work on this.

3.Mont and Blade 2 - maybe beta on late 2012, expect best game ever :D, at least epic singleplayer campaing, great multiplayer and mod support, hope they will crush idea stealers from FATSHARK 

Probably going to buy all.

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #63 on: November 29, 2011, 02:58:48 am »
0
Next year will be great for mediaval combat games.

1.Age of Chivalry - It can be fun multiplayer game, some different combat experinace from mount and blade. Hope beta start early next year.

2. War of Roses - multiplayer cheeky copy of warband which paradox want to sell as AAA game with solid graphics, some sort of character proggresion, unlocking new equipment, singleplayer only as tutorial, and no mods before they sell few dlc. :? From interviews it seems that Q2 as realise date on paradox site is unrealistisc, better hope for december 2012. They will probably have hard time create lagfree netcode for epic multiplayer battles, actualy talowords did solid work on this.

3.Mont and Blade 2 - maybe beta on late 2012, expect best game ever :D, at least epic singleplayer campaing, great multiplayer and mod support, hope they will crush idea stealers from FATSHARK 

Probably going to buy all.
To be on the safe side: Buy ALL medieval combat games! Not like those indie games are that expensive anyway :D
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #64 on: December 15, 2011, 03:26:50 pm »
0
The young Mala?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE64VDR00nM&feature=related

(Fake of course)

However:

“We want a huge skill component like Mount & Blade, but we’d also like to make it a bit more accessible. It should feel natural: like the way you start playing Battlefield or Modern Warfare. You don’t have to be a pro before you start playing, so when you get attacked you should get a feeling for how to defend yourself.”
« Last Edit: December 15, 2011, 03:35:25 pm by Overdriven »

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #65 on: December 15, 2011, 03:50:41 pm »
+1
“We want a huge skill component like Mount & Blade, but we’d also like to make it a bit more accessible. It should feel natural: like the way you start playing Battlefield or Modern Warfare. You don’t have to be a pro before you start playing, so when you get attacked you should get a feeling for how to defend yourself.”


Sounds too easy. I love games that make your head explode from confusion when you start playing them (ala Dwarf Fortress).

Offline ManOfWar

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 243
  • Infamy: 36
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • No crutches at all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Remnants
  • Game nicks: Remnant_ManOfWar (Formerly Takeda)
  • IRC nick: ManOfWar
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #66 on: December 15, 2011, 05:23:27 pm »
0

Sounds too easy. I love games that make your head explode from confusion when you start playing them (ala Dwarf Fortress).

You should get better at a game from practice..

Not just be super awesome at the very beginning, or even moderate unless you have special talent for it-

Skill takes practice man, I hope they do not casualize it...
Just a soldier

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #67 on: January 20, 2012, 11:08:57 pm »
0
New Screens from Alpha testing:
(click to show/hide)

There are also lots of images of weapons:
(click to show/hide)

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #68 on: January 20, 2012, 11:10:54 pm »
0
Armour looks a smidge too "oiled" in first screen shot but certainly that is sexy!

I want to try it now.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 806
  • Infamy: 2122
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #69 on: January 21, 2012, 03:31:40 pm »
+1
Can't wait.

Warband is sooo old, it badly needs a replacement (for people who have decent PCs).

Offline B3RS3RK

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 377
  • Infamy: 103
  • cRPG Player
  • Sexy and I know it.
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Saracen_Berserkaziz_Amir
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #70 on: January 21, 2012, 03:55:15 pm »
0
I doubt War of the Roses will be an adequade Replacement for Warband.I think it will be somewhat more casual.
Maybe it woud be better for me to find out where you life and kill you when you are satch a Soziopath. You have enough now.
"I don´t believe in anything, I´m just here for the violence."

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1214
  • Infamy: 1914
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #71 on: January 21, 2012, 04:03:09 pm »
+2
Warband is casual, c-rpg is "grind till it becomes casual". Everyone learn this combat system after some time, it really isn't that special as most people think.

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #72 on: January 21, 2012, 04:14:16 pm »
0
Agree. And they finally got ninjas right.
What, I don't see no ninjas.
Hahaha, love you Khorin, that joke never gets old.

Offline ManOfWar

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 243
  • Infamy: 36
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • No crutches at all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Remnants
  • Game nicks: Remnant_ManOfWar (Formerly Takeda)
  • IRC nick: ManOfWar
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #73 on: January 21, 2012, 05:33:14 pm »
0
That arrow in the picture looks a tad too long

does anyone else agree?
Just a soldier

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #74 on: January 21, 2012, 07:23:31 pm »
0
That arrow in the picture looks a tad too long

does anyone else agree?
Although longbow arrows are very long, I doubt anyone could draw the bow that far that this arrow should be that long.