Oh, I understand completely now. Carry on.
I'm not saying that the spawn system is perfect. I'm not stating that my alliance leaders are wrong.
I'm saying that you, nor anyone else, has been able to refute what I've said in Pecores vs LLJK and ATS vs DFC. In both cases the attackers had enough people spawned (90%+) to defend their spawn. The fact that they didn't defend it, doesn't make me wrong. It means that they were fighting an uphill battle, they didn't have the equipment and they didn't have the organization to defend it.
Instead of putting words in my mouth, come back with a sound argument. DFC could have defended vs ATS. Pecores could have defended vs LLJK. In both cases they had enough people to defend, they just were unorganized and didn't have the proper equipment.
I don't think you'll find anyone who fought in the DFC vs ATS battle, who fought for ATS who is going to disagree with me that DFC could have defended their spawn if they were more organized. Yes, the advantage was with ATS, but all of DFC was spawned in by the time ATS' infantry came into view.
I've consistently been making the same arguments and have not yet had someone reply to what I was saying and try to claim otherwise (and be truthful). Anyone who has tried to argue my points has lied or just attacked me personally, or changed my words around.
