strategus rule update

[Gingerpussy]

Sorry, I thought I had listed mine.  Basically FACTION MEMBERS get the benefits of the FACTION taking a village, not just 1 fief holder getting +1 troop.  It also supports factions working strategically and non-factioned players still can easily accumulate troops and gold and raid villages etc. without there being a dichotomy between the two.  Allows for more strategic planning and play and working as a faction to meet goals and objectives that support larger strategies.  As is there really is no point to taking a city/castle/village other than bragging rights for your faction, where is the strategy in that?? (You basially can get the same beneift of owning a village by recruiting 1 new clan member, which with 30+ people in your clan is not a real incentive to take a village)  That gets old real fast.

+1 BUMP

[Bjarky]

indeed +1

[Tristan]

I like the idea that it is only the owner. This forces the clan to spread out ownership of villages, hence making strat more medieval and feudal-like.

However, the bonus of x2 is too small. As others have said it equals nothing but one more person. It ought to be x5 or maybe even x 10.

[Topsnus]

In real strategus land will be far more important. This is why the game seems off balance currently. Calm down.

My question is that does this mean we can all raid the neutral villages right now? As far as i know they should have no troops. Does this mean free stuff for everyone who clicks attack village? I dont want to try it in case it does a real attack and i get wiped out.

[Bjarky]

In real strategus land will be far more important. This is why the game seems off balance currently. Calm down.

My question is that does this mean we can all raid the neutral villages right now? As far as i know they should have no troops. Does this mean free stuff for everyone who clicks attack village? I dont want to try it in case it does a real attack and i get wiped out.

hmmm, you would still need enough troops to meet the 1/3 +1 rule, but i'm not sure if chadz really has activated this, cus there's no "raid link" yet.

[Panoply]

the 1/3 +1 rule

What is this.

[Blondin]

What is this.

if someone attack with less than 1/3+1 it's an auto loose.

[Topsnus]

but if they have 0 troops, then you cant attack with less than 1/3 plus 1, unless you attack with 0.

[Leshanae]

I signed up for a battle for 0 gold on the side of AI village, but the village doesn't accept me. Why?

[Bjarky]

its a bug, npc fiefs wont accept any yet 
the fallens have sneakely tampered with the system 

[Tears of Destiny]

its a bug, npc fiefs wont accept any yet 
the fallens have sneakely tampered with the system 

My stance on this

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,10636.0.html
 

[Bjarky]

I am ok with this, the Villagers are demonstrating common sense.
The Brigade marches on.

hehe, common sense, that is a nice village, i must say ^^

[marco1391]

I fully agree with Kesh, the x2 makes no sense atm, either transform that x2 into at least a x4 or just extend the bonus to all the players in the faction

[Olwen]

but if they have 0 troops, then you cant attack with less than 1/3 plus 1, unless you attack with 0.

mathfail lol

[Butan]

I fully agree with Kesh, the x2 makes no sense atm, either transform that x2 into at least a x4 or just extend the bonus to all the players in the faction

x2 makes sense coz its more than standard x1.

If ownership meant x1 some would ask to transform it to x2...



Greedy people.





Btw, am I alone to not be able to transfer items/gold/troops to faction clanmates that are in the vicinity ?