Messages

1

EU (Official) / Re: [BAN] Infante_STF

« on: November 06, 2015, 11:07:45 pm »

Lies. The ban was not for teamkilling. It was a 30 min ban because I didn't attack a Krems friend of the enemy team (delaying). And I'm not a wizard to understand what means "Banana or brocola". Nice try Don't try to justify your post, everyone know which kind of player you are. If you have any question, ask Fin about it. Don't try to manipulate a post again, it will lower your karma.

2

EU (Official) / Re: ban bjord

« on: November 06, 2015, 12:52:23 pm »

I have to say thay I saw Bjord writing something like this against turks players yesterday. This is racist, childist and stupid. Nothing to get surprised seeing who wrote it.

I have a turd on my toilet kurd. Go clean it. Or something very similar. It's on the game log and moderators can check it. Thanks bjord for your contribution on my post. Here is mine. I hope they ban you for a long time.

3

EU (Official) / Re: [BAN] Amox_Lekismurderer

« on: November 05, 2015, 10:25:47 pm »

Take a look at the image. Because one of your teammates hit you, who you didn't report. I have demonstrated in my images how you modified the evidences and that you are one of the most dishonourable players ever this game had. And most of the teamhits are nudges sadly. Why your clanmate hit you? Because you were leeching maybe or just because trolling. And he was not the only one, and there was people asking you politely to stop it. You are not the best example of proper cRPG behaviour.

4

EU (Official) / Re: [BAN] Amox_Lekismurderer

« on: November 05, 2015, 10:05:45 pm »

Here it is. The images are from the first ban thread: http://forum.melee.org/eu-%28official%29/%28ban%29-infante_stf/

http://imgur.com/a/6Zdat

Why the distortion of the image on the second fake teamhit is bigger than the first one?. Easy reply, just because it's from another screenshot. Also, whenever I teamhit him he reported automatically after. Why didn't he did it this time? Curious. Because I didn't hit him. Maybe this proof is not enough, but I'm 100% sure he was modifying the screenshots to create false evidences.

5

EU (Official) / Re: [BAN] Amox_Lekismurderer

« on: November 05, 2015, 09:53:30 pm »

Don't worry, I'll post images of the evidence that you modified screenshots. Just wait a while.

6

EU (Official) / [BAN] Amox_Lekismurderer

« on: November 05, 2015, 09:23:06 pm »

1. Name of your character involved: Infante_STF
2. Name of offending character(s); Amox_Lekismurderer
3. Time and server, as accurately as possible: multiple times during the last week.
4. Written description of what happened, the whole story. Also what happened before and after:
Creating false ban threads for unintentional tk's twice among non-reported intentional teamhits.

5. Why you think the offender did what he did.*: I don't care.
6. Multiple Screenshots: Sadly, I don't have because usually I don't care about tk but I hope game server logs can demonstrate he tk'ed me repeatedly more than one time. Today log's are enough. Multiple hits without no reason after saying sorry for teamhit.

Abusing a ban thread when someone is guilty for the same thing he's requesting should be also bannable.

Another thing I have noticed is that Lekis modified with photoshop or something the "evidences" to create teamhits where it doesn't exist. If a moderator can check this, I would be grateful. On the images of the first ban thread, Rapo and me where trolling him with voice commands, but without Tk'ing him (I mean, I know nudging archers while they are aiming is disturbing, but that's not exactly TKing). The only time I hit him was his cav, if I don't remember wrong. I'm completely sure I've never hit him too many times. If you see the screenshots it appears to be that I have been teamhitting him for a while and i'm 100% sure I didn't do it. I agree that on some screenshots I give him a hit (on others, only nudges), but to be honest, my shitty x-bow unloomed build doesn't do serious damage and everyone on this game trolled a player once.

This dishonourable player have taken a lot of time modyfing screenshots to have false evidences of teamhits that didn't exist. And this, is a serious offense more than ocasionally "trolling" we do in the game without the intention of disturbing players, like spamming voice commands.

Modified image from original ban thread:  http://forum.melee.org/eu-%28official%29/%28ban%29-infante_stf/

http://imgur.com/a/6Zdat

7

EU (Official) / Re: [BAN] Infante_STF

« on: November 05, 2015, 09:19:30 pm »

First off, that shoot was unintentional. Second, you are such dishonourable scum who repeatdly TK'ed me and if devs want to check it, just taking a look to the server logs is more than enough. Second, I have never been banned for three of four years with the exception of one time about 2013 for being AFK. I have been playing this mod for 4 years and no one opened a ban thread. And because all of this i'm requesting a ban for you and your lies.

The first "evidence" was a clusterfuck upper the stairs and the image shows I was killed after so it's difficult to believe there was any intention. On the second image he intentionally displaced hisself to the right corner of the house to create the impression that I was aiming him intentionally. It wasn't. At the moment of the screenshot I was aiming north and he's on my right. When I shot, I was aiming a group of 2-3 teammates and 2-3 enemies and he walked to the right corner surrounding the bulding to create an evidence of a completely unintentional TK. Between two "evidences" passed about 2-3 days and I was playing all this time frequently. For these reasons i'm posting a ban thread for you, the second time in four years of playing I open a ban thread for someone.

8

General Discussion / Re: Describe crpg with gifs

« on: February 11, 2015, 07:11:08 pm »

Sometimes, when a bunch of ranged f@gs are disturbing i feel like this:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

9

Game Balance Discussion / Re: An autobalance that puts clans together on public servers is a terrible idea.

« on: February 14, 2014, 07:30:26 pm »

Indeed. A thing we said on forums about 1 million of times. If clans want to play together for fuck's sake, go strategus. Because banner balance ruin the game and is the root of all whinings in balance forum. A public server should be for fun, not for having in the same team a stack of full experienced players and in the another one, randoms and peasants. In this situation, I log off from crpg because it's not fair and is so boring.

I said a lot of times that balance should be about classes. Distribute archers & cavalry on both teams equally. I'm 100% sure that it will improve crpg a lot. And is too easy to implement. But I don't hope any change in this balance because devs ignore us on his straight mind.

10

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Xbow with 1 hand is OP

« on: February 06, 2014, 10:56:13 pm »

If I was a crossbowman, I wouldn't take a 1h weapon, I'd take a +3 Langes Messer in 2h mode. Similar stats to a Katana, but with a much more damaging thrust (albeit with the polearm thrust animation). A 1h sword may have a better thrust animation for certain situations, but the sideswing damage with 5PS is laughably low on anyone with decent armor. If you are facing a crossbowman with a stabby 1h sword, you know he's going to be relying on thrusts attacks, so just downblock/facehug like you would against a hoplite.

An xbowman with a 2h Langes is equally deadly with all four attack directions, so they are much less predictable to fight.

I think not Phew. The best option (imo) is a blunt&pierce weapon. The lack of STR don't allow to land good hits. 2h animations are good but cut damage is not a friend of a low str char.

11

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Xbow with 1 hand is OP

« on: February 06, 2014, 04:50:39 pm »

Have you tried archery? On hi lvl with 9 ATH lots of ppl are able to catch me. Kiting (read: run away, shoot, run away, shoot) is impossible even for me with quite op bulid (18/27). Some sort of kiting is possible if a str whore with max 2 ath wants to catch me.

Arbalest + steel bolts= 10.6 weight  (ready to shoot)
one quiver of arrows= 10 weight  (wait, i need a bow to shoot)

So argument move like snail is not an argument in this conversation 

That mean the decission of nerfing archers adding insane weight to quivers is an error. Because an archer is a skirmisher by nature, but devs, after the forum "nerf ranged 2013" shitstorm, decided to break the class. Another example of crpg disease of nerfing all things that can breath. I hate archers. I hate you all. But this is no reason to nerf you. Because all the 2h&pole pop think that they are the only true faith and there is no skill on ranged. Only click & shoot.

12

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Crossbow Skill Requirement Suggestion -- "Steady Hands"

« on: February 06, 2014, 03:03:32 pm »

Do you think kafein that we should change our style because you like to play naked? Seriously, fuck you all. All your lobbyism. You are justifying a nerf on xbow population, just because it increased. A dangerous precedent. Adapt your playstyle and learn to play.

Your arguments (in general) are tendentious, fallacies. Stop the inquisition I said. And I say it again.

13

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Crossbow Skill Requirement Suggestion -- "Steady Hands"

« on: February 05, 2014, 11:26:24 pm »

And another -1 for your next post. And infinite -1 to all of antiranged lobby. And dont tilt, I don't care. The reason is so simple. Archers gain benefits from PD. 16% damage to damage poll for every point in power draw. Throwers get a +/-10% damage bonus from each PT. Cavalry get bonus from each riding point. Do you want to add a skill for xbow? Ok. Power reload. 10% decrease reload time for each skill point ;) Oh! And I guess you won't find it fair. I also do not find it fair.

Steady hands, power reload, and that all bullshit you are trying to convince yourselves that xbow + 1h is op. You want to ruin our class. Not asking only for a non-benefit skill for nerfing the class. You are asking on other thread suggestions to increase STR requeriments. Ok. I accept. Increase in +3 the STR requeriment of all kind of armor, because I feel or I think the requeriments are too low. No. Stop the nerfing rage.  What is OP? xbow? 1handed stab? Is just rage about all kind of ranged? I remember everyone that xbow have suffered no important changes. Arbalest was nerfed about 1 year ago. The only thing that changed is xbow population. A new fever. A ciclic crpg history. And i'm bored of one man army heroes crying on forums 24h/7/365. I don't ask for a nerf never as long as I remember and I blame the bunch of forum whiners crpg have. Is exhausting.

The most horrible crpg disease is the massive nerf the game suffered in two years. If I nerf A, B becomes powerful. Forum ragers whining about nerfing B. Devs nerfed B so C become powerful. Another rage campaing to nerf C and we can repeat this history to the infinite. And nothing changed. Ranged still kill. 2h heroes are superb op. Expert pikeman jumper metagamers. The thing, that I notice, is that very skilled players changed their class to xbow after 1h stab was buffed. In a slow progression. And you are all suffering the consecuences of game unbalance. Insane amount of cav? Insane amount of ranged. Insane amount of 2h heroes? Insane amount of cav & ranged. Rock, paper, scissors.

And things that break balance didn't change at all since crpg 2010. Unfair autoteam balance. 20 byzantium playing against 20 peasants & random players (for example, I have nothing against Byz). 10 cav in team A. 0 cav in team B. So I know, that devs will do that they think is the better option for the game. But I played this game since two years. And I played all kind of classes. HA, HX, footman, polearm, 2h, archer, xbowman. And I have a global idea of the game balance. And we are not breaking it at all. Is just an increase of population. And I have to see how a bunch of my old friends is asking to nerf my class because they do not accept that we can kill from the distance. Just it.

Play and let us play. And let us play the class we want. No the class you want for me. If you don't like xbow class do not play it. But don't ask for unnecesary changes because we are not breaking the balance at all. Stop the inquisition.

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

And I wish that devs learned from this pathethic nerf history on melee battlegrounds. And not to do the same again. Play and let all classes play.

14

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Crossbow Skill Requirement Suggestion -- "Steady Hands"

« on: February 05, 2014, 03:27:46 am »

If shitty things like this that is proposed happens, prepare for an archer invasion. And I will be the first that will change the class. And we will hear the same raging about archery. ;)

15

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Xbow with 1 hand is OP

« on: February 04, 2014, 08:48:34 pm »

Where's the drawback to this 1h+shield+xbow which is capable of one-shots (at long range even )?

Capable of one-shot? Gurnisson... gurnisson. In where crpg world do you live? I have troubles sometimes even shooting peasants with a full loomed set of heavy crossbow + steel bolts. Drawbacks?

a) If you want to use a shield and a xbow and still be proficient with 1h you need to split your stats even more that a shielder. That mean being mediocre in all terms, or focused in ranged or focused in 1h. There is no way to be all the things you want on 31 levels.
b) Is a non-intended behaviour having a buckler + xbow + 1h + shield? I think. Maybe. Unrealistic? Of course not. Genoese xbowman for example carried a pavise shield.
c) Increasing xbow STR requeriments for "agi" stacking? Oh god. I notice today that a majority of crpg 2h&pole population have from 21 to 27 agi.
d) Xbow life is expensive. Don't forget that. 20-25k to upkeep pool ONLY from a high-tier xbow and steel bolts.
e) THE FUCKING RAIN! that is disturbing the last weeks on 75% of the map rotation.

So. I understand the lobbyism rage about all mankind of ranged. And I accept with a smile all of their negative votes to my posts.