Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mullerian

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
Game Balance Discussion / Re: My thoughts about heavy lance
« on: May 12, 2011, 12:24:25 pm »
UI'm using the pike now, it's way faster than the heavy lance and has more reach.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,4973.0.html

"You are not allowed to use a pike on a horse. Please stop doing it."

2
General Discussion / Re: Thx for buffing the archers
« on: May 11, 2011, 02:50:29 pm »
Not saying there is a problem anywhere. What I was targeting was Mullerian's silly comment.
Yeah it was a rather poor comparison, i just wanted to illustrate that removing something useful from a class is not a buff, no matter how you sugarcoat it.

"And yes archers where buffed in that now they are, you know, ARCHERS and not 2h/pole/shielder with bow."

And yes, he did indeed use the word "buffed" which as far as i know often means they are improved somehow.

3
General Discussion / Re: The clock
« on: May 11, 2011, 12:20:53 am »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Thanks, that picture is awesome

4
General Discussion / Re: Thx for buffing the archers
« on: May 10, 2011, 07:17:41 pm »
There is so much fail in that post I don't even know where to begin to mock you... ARGH! MY BRAINS!

Oww, how cute

5
General Discussion / Re: Thx for buffing the archers
« on: May 10, 2011, 06:57:13 pm »
Heh, the changed arrow speed is NOTHING compared to the change in lance speed. I still feel bad about all those teammate-kebabs I made... Shit was so hard to get used to :D

And yes archers where buffed in that now they are, you know, ARCHERS and not 2h/pole/shielder with bow.

Im sorry but how is that a buff? So lancers would be buffed if you removed their horse because then they are you know, lancers, not lancers on a horse?

6
Unban Essays / Re: "why is racism wrong"
« on: May 10, 2011, 03:35:06 pm »
Ah, we could ofc ban all talk about money and power... or not :)

No that is rather unreasonable indeed. I just found it a bit far fetched the way the discussion was drawn from a person saying "niggaz" and then moving that into World War II.

I do not disagree with rascism being wrong, i do agree that it should be banable. I do disagree that its much worse to write "niggaz" on the internet compared to cheating and being a complete douchebag.
I also find it mildly amusing that while normal rascism is completely banned (like it should be), theres absolutely nothing wrong with calling people bundle of stickss or other homophobic insults, thats generally accepted across most internet communities.

Edit: Just realized this probably isnt the best place to be discussing this, so ill quit here. Good luck Panos, hope you dont go retarded again and can keep it civil this time :)

7
Unban Essays / Re: "why is racism wrong"
« on: May 10, 2011, 02:50:36 pm »
You do know that racism kills thousands every year? That millions of people dont get jobs, food, water every year because of racism? You do know that racism started one of the most hated ideologies ever, and 2nd world war?

Yeah, i am sure it had nothing to do with sociological issues that followed germany getting their ass kicked in ww1 and thus needing a scapegoat.

Besides that im fairly sure that money and power has been behind a lot more killings during our time than rascism has.
But yes you're right Nihtgenga, we are at an impasse. We just simply disagree on the basics :)

8
Unban Essays / Re: "why is racism wrong"
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:38:12 am »
seeing racisms as an "opinion" is the first step to accept it.
just like you did in your previous post
its no an opinion it is a crime or leeds to crime sooner or later.

Oh and you dont see a difference between a guy who rages a little bit and tks in revenge and a guy who is beeing racist? seriously, you dont?

No i dont, i doubt hes gonna commit a lot of hate crimes over the internet tbh. Also i have yet to see a reasonable country where they managed to convict anyone of non-spoken out thoughts.

I dont approve of rascism, but i dont see why this should be treated much harder than anyone other retard who feels the need to run around and ruin it for other people.

9
Unban Essays / Re: "why is racism wrong"
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:23:11 am »
Oh, now racism is an opinion?

furthermore the essay title than should have been "why I should keep my racist believes to myself"
I am just saying that I find it depressing that you want someone like this in the crpg community

How is rascism not an opinion? All i said was, being a rascist isnt much of an issue as long as you keep it to yourself, and this community isnt exactly invite only and most people get a second or even third chance to redeem themselves. I dont see why it should be that much different for this guy.

10
Unban Essays / Re: "why is racism wrong"
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:06:34 am »
interesting that racism is tollerated in this community. I would give him a life time ban cause this essay wont change him or his "view"

Rascism isnt that much of an issue if he keeps it to himself? Theres a huge difference between having opinions and needing to tell everyone else about these opinions and im guessing the reason he got off is because they hope he learned that theres no need to share the wealth on that particular subject.

11
Longbow does pierce damage, warbow does cut. Longbow seems like the winner, here.

It does lower pierce damage than the warbow and it shoots far slower. Comparing just a single set of stats on the weapons seems like a rather flawed comparison to make.

Anyways i would recommend buying and trying out both. I like having both for specific scenarios. For example i prefer for the warbow for when theres a lot of horse archers, then the longbow just seems too slow to shoot back properly.

And for the post above, i heard they were buffing the pierce damage on the longbow a bit. Do a search for posts by Paul.

12
Game Admin aBooze / Re: Gash & Devilize
« on: May 07, 2011, 11:33:58 pm »
Are you sure you didnt break any rules you didnt read about? You're obviously not too good at reading.

13
Closed Requests / Re: Ban request for Asur_Babylon7k
« on: May 04, 2011, 11:47:47 am »
Finally here. Well I was this "other guy" conserning this post. As Mortemia stated we were in the middle of the battle and suddenly both of us were kicked of the game. From the game log we discovered that it was Babylon7k who had reported us of being "leeching". Maybe everybody else can read chat during fight but personally I can't.
There are 2 possibilities:
-Leeching system was bugged and 2 fighting players were kicked in 1-2 second difference.
-Babylon7k is lying bastard.

Really? How about the third option you are clearly omitting. You were afk and are now butthurt because you couldnt leech like pre-patch? Not saying its what happened, but its a possibility :)

14
I played maybe 10 hours since the patch with that report crap,
and I won't play CRPG any more till it is fixed or removed.

Here's where I talk about it in the "what needs to be changed in v0.22" announcement thread:
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,4450.300.html
(click to show/hide)

Well tbh im all for removing the bonus multiplier on a successful report and keeping the negative on a non-successful one. That way you're not giving added incentive to abuse it, but you will still open up for removing people who feel like everyone else should be penalized because they cant just wait till after they are dead with going to the kitchen or tabbing out to fix equipment.

15
General Discussion / Re: Reporting Leechers!
« on: May 02, 2011, 07:29:38 pm »
Why can't we just make a system that if you spawn without a weapon you get instakicked within 5 secs?

Because having stones in your hand does not mean you suddenly contribute. You might still be afk, and then all the weapons in the world aint gonna make a difference on how useful you are.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6