My life-partner Oberyn should have been unmuted at the same time as me.
We're all white inside, the proof is in the cum
I came
I don't understand why you're defending Muslims, Heskey, Muslims hate black guys.You are just saying that a lot of black people hate themselves??!! :shock: :rolleyes:
You are just saying that a lot of black people hate themselves??!! :shock: :rolleyes:visitors can't see pics , please register or login
This comment just disqualified you from any further discussion about muslems if you don't even know that islam is one major religion in black afrika.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
makes you look even dummer?
Isn't it a known fact by now that labeling your stupidity as bait/trolling just makes you look evenIt's a known fact that only someone with 60 IQ wouldn't recognize that as an obvious bait. I knew Heskey wouldn't fall for it, but I'm glad to see I caught one of the retards here. Do you suffer from FAS, Utrakil?dummersillier?
Edit: thanks for the hint Antiblitz
Genuine answer? If you havent guessed already I dont need to 'defend' Islam in my country. I didnt need to 'defend' any Irish people in the 90s or early 2000s either. We didnt bomb Cork in retaliation and we didnt talk about deporting all the Irish and we sure as hell didnt try and turn this into 'us' and 'them'.
Terrorism is scary cos you dont know exactly who is going to be a terrorist. But, guess what, we never started assuming all Irish people were terrorists. And, guess what, both the IRA and the PIRA declared ceasefires and ended their struggles over time. How do you win an ideological war? By standing your ground and being immovable.
Maybe a country that hasnt experienced much terrorism finds ISIS scary, maybe a country that hasnt witnessed exactly how much they can endure without suddenly being 'destroyed' by terrorism thinks that Islam poses a genuine physical threat to their country.
So far i rank the frequency and organisational skills of Islamist attacks and I am not impressed. No western country is about to die from it lol (no-matter how much you may want to believe that this is the ultimate ideological struggle of your age), what do you think a country is?
The only way terrorism will have any meaningful impact on any western nation, is if we allow them to dictate the terms and infect us with... Terror. Change the way your country behaves, change your border policy, change your attitude towards foreigners, limit individual freedoms. Those are meaningful and lasting changes, but those are changes made from within a country by it's people and it's leaders, never by the terrorists themselves (but it sure is what a terrorist wants, cos it's the only the only way they can make an impact on the world and they know it).
Self-hating leftist cucks no-doubt.
Sorry I don't pay as much attention to you as heskey does. this unfortunately doesn't give me enough understanding of you to see all the different nuances of nonsense you post. Maybe one day I will be able to tell apart what bullshit you really believe and what other bullshit you just fart out as bait.Because it's an obvious joke, it's like saying Muslims don't like Arabs. Muslim isn't a race. Just so you know.
Because it's an obvious joke, it's like saying Muslims don't like Arabs. Muslim isn't a race. Just so you know.
Nice comeback, but all cRPG forum dwellers know you simply tried to pursue Oberyn attempt at determining what is Heskey skin color, because we all know that since Heskey doesnt seem to hate muslims, he must be black, thus the irony of your post. Try to make it less obvious next time though, and man up a bit. Retard.Yawn, so obvious. You're really bad at trying to provoke me, Butan. Next time try subtler personality changes, only Leshman can get away with full schizophrenia.
For your 2016 forum persona, could you also start using an Irish written accent? Would be pretty great.
The only way terrorism will have any meaningful impact on any western nation, is if we allow them to dictate the terms and infect us with... Terror. Change the way your country behaves, change your border policy, change your attitude towards foreigners, limit individual freedoms. Those are meaningful and lasting changes, but those are changes made from within a country by it's people and it's leaders, never by the terrorists themselves (but it sure is what a terrorist wants, cos it's the only the only way they can make an impact on the world and they know it)
C’est très bien qu’il y ait des Français jaunes, des Français noirs, des Français bruns. Ils montrent que la France est ouverte à toutes les races et qu’elle a une vocation universelle. Mais à condition qu’ils restent une petite minorité. Sinon, la France ne serait plus la France. Nous sommes quand même avant tout un peuple européen de race blanche, de culture grecque et latine et de religion chrétienne. Qu'on ne se raconte pas d'histoires ! Les musulmans, vous êtes allés les voir ? Vous les avez regardés avec leurs turbans et leur djellabas ? Vous voyez bien que ce ne sont pas des Français ! Ceux qui prônent l'intégration ont une cervelle de colibri, même s'ils sont très savants. Essayez d'intégrer de l'huile et du vinaigre. Agitez la bouteille. Au bout d'un moment, ils se sépareront de nouveau. Les Arabes sont des Arabes, les Français sont des Français. Vous croyez que le corps français peut absorber dix millions de musulmans, qui demain seront vingt millions et après-demain quarante ? Si nous faisions l'intégration, si tous les Arabes et Berbères d'Algérie étaient considérés comme Français, comment les empêcherait-on de venir s'installer en métropole, alors que le niveau de vie y est tellement plus élevé ? Mon village ne s'appellerait plus Colombey-les-Deux-Églises, mais Colombey-les-Deux-Mosquées !
Though it did make me wonder what the threshold is.
I've said this before and I'll say it again, demographics is reality, everything else, all the superficial, idealogical claptrap about these values that supposedly define our civilizations despited being around for no more than a few decades, is just a fart in the wind. Anyone who is a native of Britain, a native of France, a native of any of the nations that are undergoing ideological attacks to the point that even the idea of them being a "nation" in the first place is being ridiculed, the very conceptof them being a "people" is being destroyed and retroactively erased from history, SHOULD be worried and angry and afraid. Anyone who looks at the statistics, the changing demographics of these "nations" in name only, the attitude of the foreigners (particularly muslims) who feel completely entitled to pour in by the hundreds of thousands, by the millions, as if the land was theirs by birthright, in supposed payment for colonialism or imperialism or because of the universalist claims of islam or because the self-loathing cucks orgasm at the thought of their own people finally being outnumbered in their own lands and encourage this attitude among their own and among the foreigners at every chance they get, anyone who has any sense of history and can look at the big picture and the obvious progression of where this is leading, SHOULD be worried and angry and afraid. Having people like you tell me with a straight face that nothing should be changed, that's exactly what the terrorists want, frankly makes me laugh uproariously. Then again, you aren't native, are you? So what the fuck would you know about it. Of course this new, crypto-marxist, identity politics conception of the true "values" of western civilizations (the ones deliberately designed to destroy it, ironically enough) is the one you addopt, anything else would just be fascist neo-YMCA.
Oberyn, at the turn of the Renaissance couldn't the exact same argument be used to defend feodalism from the attacks of the new nationalist ideology? Nations are also merely a recent construction, simply on a larger timeframe. What you seem to be angry about is the selective (and indeed discriminatory) application of an ideology, not the ideology itself. You are criticizing a pants-on-head retarded interpretation of western values as if it was the real thing that more than three people believe in. Tumblr isn't the entire world.
Showed you an article laying out how sociologists (Tumblr ground zero, I've said this to you over and over and over, and it seems to fly over your head everytime, Tumblr is merely a symptom of a much more entrenched and powerful sector of academia) influenced actual law with their retarded interpretations, literally erasing the existence of ethnic french people, and you still ignore it and pretend it has no influence on policy, on law, on media, on government, on the general zeitgeist of this generation, when it defines and determines it again and again and again. Is it wilfull ignorance? Arrogant complacency, completely incapable of recognizing the effects this retarded interpretation (I'd say it has supplanted the "old" interpretation a while ago, and is the new norm) of this ideology has on reality? I don't know. Keep pretending it's just a couple of Tumblr morons with no power whatsoever and not elites placed at the highest levels of influence if it makes you feel better.
Does not compute
Guidelines for Countering Racial, Ethnic and Religious Profiling
On Oct. 6, 2001 at its National Convention in Seattle, the Society of Professional Journalists passed a resolution urging members and fellow journalists to take steps against racial profiling in their coverage of the war on terrorism and to reaffirm their commitment to:
— Use language that is informative and not inflammatory;
— Portray Muslims, Arabs and Middle Eastern and South Asian Americans in the richness of their diverse experiences;
— Seek truth through a variety of voices and perspectives that help audiences understand the complexities of the events in Pennsylvania, New York City and Washington, D.C.
Guidelines
Visual images
— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing Americans mourning those lost in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing rescue and other public service workers and military personnel.
— Do not represent Arab Americans and Muslims as monolithic groups. Avoid conveying the impression that all Arab Americans and Muslims wear traditional clothing.
— Use photos and features to demystify veils, turbans and other cultural articles and customs.
Stories
— Seek out and include Arabs and Arab Americans, Muslims, South Asians and men and women of Middle Eastern descent in all stories about the war, not just those about Arab and Muslim communities or racial profiling.
— Cover the victims of harassment, murder and other hate crimes as thoroughly as you cover the victims of overt terrorist attacks.
— Make an extra effort to include olive-complexioned and darker men and women, Sikhs, Muslims and devout religious people of all types in arts, business, society columns and all other news and feature coverage, not just stories about the crisis.
— Seek out experts on military strategies, public safety, diplomacy, economics and other pertinent topics who run the spectrum of race, class, gender and geography.
— When writing about terrorism, remember to include white supremacist, radical anti-abortionists and other groups with a history of such activity.
— Do not imply that kneeling on the floor praying, listening to Arabic music or reciting from the Quran are peculiar activities.
— When describing Islam, keep in mind there are large populations of Muslims around the world, including in Africa, Asia, Canada, Europe, India and the United States. Distinguish between various Muslim states; do not lump them together as in constructions such as "the fury of the Muslim world."
— Avoid using word combinations such as "Islamic terrorist" or "Muslim extremist" that are misleading because they link whole religions to criminal activity. Be specific: Alternate choices, depending on context, include "Al Qaeda terrorists" or, to describe the broad range of groups involved in Islamic politics, "political Islamists." Do not use religious characterizations as shorthand when geographic, political, socioeconomic or other distinctions might be more accurate.
— Avoid using terms such as "jihad" unless you are certain of their precise meaning and include the context when they are used in quotations. The basic meaning of "jihad" is to exert oneself for the good of Islam and to better oneself.
— Consult the Library of Congress guide for transliteration of Arabic names and Muslim or Arab words to the Roman alphabet. Use spellings preferred by the American Muslim Council, including "Muhammad," "Quran," and "Makkah ," not "Mecca."
— Regularly seek out a variety of perspectives for your opinion pieces. Check your coverage against the five Maynard Institute for Journalism Education fault lines of race and ethnicity, class, geography, gender and generation.
— Ask men and women from within targeted communities to review your coverage and make suggestions.
Incidentally the google translate for that De Gaulle quote, since I'm sure many don't give enough of a fuck for a simple google translate:
"It is very good that there are yellow French, French blacks, browns French. They show that France is open to all races and has a universal vocation. But provided they remain a small minority. Otherwise, France would not be France. We are still primarily a European people Caucasian, Greek and Latin culture and Christian religion. We do not tell stories! Muslims, you went to see them? You watched them with their turbans and djellabas? You see that these are not the French! Those who advocate integration have a hummingbird brains, even if they are very learned. Try to incorporate oil and vinegar. Shake the bottle. After a while, they will separate again. The Arabs are Arabs, the French are French. You believe that the French body can absorb ten million Muslims, who tomorrow will be twenty million and forty after tomorrow? If we did the integration, if all the Arabs and Berbers of Algeria were considered French, how do we prevent it from coming to settle in metropolis, while the standard of living is so much higher? My village will be called more Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises, but Colombey-les-Deux-Mosques!"
Also note that in the original speech he literally says "white race", which is auto-translated to Caucasian by google, lol.
I know you think the "change" (destruction) of western civilization is inevitablewhat makes you fear there might be a destruction of western civilisation.
http://www.svt.se/svts/article5384068.svt/BINARY/Sverigespegling%20p%C3%A5%20SVT%20Nyheter.pdfThat shit is unbelievably fucked up. The cover up everywhere in Europe is nuts, but Sweden takes it to another level. Like photoshopping people white...
-Don't use the word "immigrant"
-Don't describe the appearance of illegals who commit crimes if they're from Africa or the mideast
-Terrorists with swedish passports are to be described as "swedes".
-If anyone claims to have been the victim of discrimination or a hate crime they are to be believed at face value
"Språk är makt. Språk är också politik. Språk signalerar normer"
"Language is power. Language is also politics. Language signals norms"
SVT is the swedish public broadcaster. These are the norms they are obligated to follow. But hey, it's just a couple of retard sociologists stuck in universities and their tumblrite followers, right Kafein? They have sooo little influence out in the real world.
Is pride and love really something completely foreign to some of you here when you look around at your own tribe? When you look at the European woman?
But hey, it's just a couple of retard sociologists stuck in universities and their tumblrite followers, right Kafein? They have sooo little influence out in the real world.
Perhaps my real world is simply not the same as yours. Perhaps I am part of the elite that doesn't give a shit, that has riches more valuable than their ethnicity, unlike the average FN voter. Perhaps I care about the actual job market and actual laws where none of this bullshit matters.Though there's some statistical correlation be careful when attributing social factors to nationalism or opposition to immigration rather than simply having different values.
In September 2012, Alexander Gauland, a former federal minister, Bernd Lucke, an economist and Konrad Adam, a former editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung from 1979 to 2000 and chief correspondent of Die Welt until 2008, founded the political group Electoral Alternative 2013 (German: Wahlalternative 2013) in Bad Nauheim, to oppose German federal policies concerning the eurozone crisis. Their manifesto was endorsed by 68 economists, journalists, and business leaders, half of whom were professors and three-quarters of whom had academic degrees.[16]
At the outset AfD presented itself as conservative and middle-class,[62] catering to a well-educated demographic as more than two-thirds of its initial supporters held doctorates,[63] giving it the nickname the "professors' party".[64] The party was described as professors and academics who dislike the compromises inflicted on their purist theories by German party politics.[65] 86% of the party's initial supporters were male.[33]
on 4 July 2015 Frauke Petry was elected as the de facto principal speaker of the party with 60% of the member votes ahead of Bernd Lucke at a party congress in Essen. Petry is a member of the right-wing faction of the AfD.[50] Her leadership was widely seen as heralding a shift of the party to the right, to focus more on issues such as migration, Islam and strengthening ties to Russia,[51] a shift which was claimed by Lucke as turning the party into a "Pegida party".[52]
A straw poll by The Economist found that nine out of ten PEGIDA protesters would back the AfD.[81]
Though there's some statistical correlation be careful when attributing social factors to nationalism or opposition to immigration rather than simply having different values.
Just one example out of many European conservative parties gaining broad popular support;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_for_Germany,
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/07/05/germanys-farage-becomes-leader-of-eurosceptic-alternative-for-germany-party/
No, De Gaulle said completely rational, relevant and intelligent things.
Oh yeah, that's working sooooo well, muslims just love France, love it's culture, love it's history, love it's past, love it's people.
Yes, and your quote wasnt one of them. Not everything is white or black, little child. Quit your pathetic self-loathing generalisation, De Gaulle and other dead old white men did great things.
Trying to oppose different human races and encouraging alienation is not of them.
Depends which muslims you are asking. I guess you've been having discussions only with the ones who raped and murdered your entire ethnic french family?
Your kind is dying out Oberyn, and its a good thing. You can not stop it, you can only hate it and add pain and suffering to yourself and others during your lifetime, with your philosophical positioning. Hundred's years from now, people will laugh at how forcefully you and your "people" tried to prevent, and ultimately only slowed down, the creation of a human race.
Looks like between 2012 and now that party got co-opted by exactly the people I'm talking about, or rather their cynic overlords.No one doubts those forces exist, though Pegida voters are generally middle-class people with a relatively high level of education. However, political inclusion is a criterion for party growth, such as when Nigel Farage sought to broaden the not dissimilar UKIP image by introducing socially conservative policies over a single-issue policy. Most of the right wing populism we currently see in Europe have adopted cornerstones of the old conservatives parties, in order to cover larger parts of the population, which is not only cynical but also aligning policies and finding common ground for different sectors of the population, itself a democratic mechanism.