cRPG

Off Topic => General Off Topic => Topic started by: Falka on August 27, 2014, 06:42:44 pm

Title: Hit-Girl
Post by: Falka on August 27, 2014, 06:42:44 pm

Quote

A firearms instructor has died after he was shot by a nine-year-old girl when she fired an Uzi at a shooting range in the Arizona desert.

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Shame she didn't get a bazooka or at least M60  ;)
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Butan on August 27, 2014, 06:49:45 pm
Shoulda stay in single security mode, I wonder if he pressed the wrong button or did it on purpose? An UZI isnt the most stable pistol to fire with.

I see he had a hand on her right forearm to control if there was a stability issue, its strange it managed to slip that bad.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Falka on August 27, 2014, 06:55:11 pm
omg ...  :|

Erm, what do you mean by " :|"? I was more like: ":lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:" when I've watched this video  :wink:
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 27, 2014, 06:55:58 pm
fire arms + children is a crime..what a stupid familly pays for instructor for their children ????

Crazy pple....
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Grumpy_Nic on August 27, 2014, 06:56:42 pm
lol... yeah give fully automatic weapons to children. Veeeeeeeery smart
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: [ptx] on August 27, 2014, 06:59:11 pm
The man was sacrificed for the glory of the 2nd Amendment! Hail!
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 27, 2014, 07:30:25 pm
fire arms + children is a crime..what a stupid familly pays for instructor for their children ????

Crazy pple....
How exactly is it a crime? Teaching your kids how to handle guns at a young age is the best way to have them treat firearms with respect and care when they're older too.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Utrakil on August 27, 2014, 07:49:00 pm
How exactly is it a crime? Teaching your kids how to handle guns at a young age is the best way to have them treat firearms with respect and care when they're older too.
Yes this is why we give them drivinglicense when they are 10. because the younger they are the easier it is for them to understand responsebility.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Prpavi on August 27, 2014, 07:56:47 pm
Nice way to lose a life and scar a young girl for life all for the sake of "respecting firearms".
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: NejStark on August 27, 2014, 08:00:30 pm
Muuricaaaaaa!!!!
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Tibe on August 27, 2014, 08:17:21 pm
How exactly is it a crime? Teaching your kids how to handle guns at a young age is the best way to have them treat firearms with respect and care when they're older too.
Let them also do smack and drive while under influence. Parentingadvice from daddy Xant.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 27, 2014, 08:39:09 pm
Yes this is why we give them drivinglicense when they are 10. because the younger they are the easier it is for them to understand responsebility.
Because firing a gun under supervision is TOTALLY the same as giving them a driving license and driving under influence.

It's not forbidden to use your brains, you know.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Macropus on August 27, 2014, 08:52:05 pm
More like "A shooting instructor got killed by his profession".
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Christo on August 27, 2014, 08:52:58 pm
Why the hell would you give an automatic weapon to a child that can't handle the recoil?

I'm fine with gun culture, but that was a reckless decision right there
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Vibe on August 27, 2014, 08:56:41 pm
Why would you let a small girl go full auto after she's shot exactly one bullet before?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 27, 2014, 08:57:10 pm
That was just awful job by the instructor. He shouldn't have been standing where he was standing, and he shouldn't have had his hands where he had his hands.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Clockworkkiller on August 27, 2014, 09:02:01 pm
Why do women, especially little girls, never seem to understand the concept of...

Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: SixThumbs on August 27, 2014, 10:08:21 pm
I watched about half of the video before I decided it's probably something I'd rather not see.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 27, 2014, 10:48:41 pm
Clearly the issue here is that this child was not introduced to fully automatic weapons at an earlier age. She really should have been exposed to this kind of weaponry at age 3.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Kaido on August 27, 2014, 11:31:03 pm
better recruit them young in army too
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 27, 2014, 11:33:17 pm
No. Dying that way is just so incredibly stupid and senseless. To be honest it's to stupid to laugh about it, I was like "meh" irl.  :?

I think we're laughing in the face of American gun culture, rather than to the man who died. He is borderline Darwin award candidate, but I don't laugh to those either.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Oberyn on August 27, 2014, 11:35:13 pm
There's two different approaches to the idea of guns in society from what I can tell.

For someone from a densely populated urban area, guns almost always equate to crime. Why would you need to carry a gun or even know how to use one? There's cops, that's what they're there for. Someone with a gun is seen as either a dubious, slightly/very paranoid vigilantee wannabe or a criminal.

For someone from a sparsely populated rural area, guns are just one of many things you are introduced to at a young age. Farm kids have been shooting guns and hunting since the invention of the fucking thing. Pretending it's some sort insane abberation is disengenuous. When the nearest help is miles away, posession of a gun and knowledge on how to use it is as sensible as keeping a well-stocked pharmacy. It's just another tool and it is perceived as such.

Whenever I see the gun debate pop up I always like to ask that question. Where did you grow up or currently live? What type of environment have you lived in most of your life, sparsely populated rural or densely populated urban? It explains a lot of the american political divide on this issue (and others). Rural vs urban is a saga that stretches quite a long way back.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 27, 2014, 11:36:18 pm
Hunting with automatic rifles, really?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: IR_Kuoin on August 27, 2014, 11:42:45 pm
If you are gonna teach your kid how to use a gun don't give them a weapon with auto give them a bolt-action or some shit.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Butan on August 27, 2014, 11:44:54 pm
Why the hell would you give an automatic weapon to a child that can't handle the recoil?

I'm fine with gun culture, but that was a reckless decision right there

I dont know for exact security measures applied in this case (young kid and full auto) but it looks like he though he had control of the gun by gripping her right forearm, but ultimately slipped from the recoil itself.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 27, 2014, 11:46:40 pm
There's two different approaches to the idea of guns in society from what I can tell.

For someone from a densely populated urban area, guns almost always equate to crime. Why would you need to carry a gun or even know how to use one? There's cops, that's what they're there for. Someone with a gun is seen as either a dubious, slightly/very paranoid vigilantee wannabe or a criminal.

For someone from a sparsely populated rural area, guns are just one of many things you are introduced to at a young age. Farm kids have been shooting guns and hunting since the invention of the fucking thing. Pretending it's some sort insane abberation is disengenuous. When the nearest help is miles away, posession of a gun and knowledge on how to use it is as sensible as keeping a well-stocked pharmacy. It's just another tool and it is perceived as such.

Whenever I see the gun debate pop up I always like to ask that question. Where did you grow up or currently live? What type of environment have you lived in most of your life, sparsely populated rural or densely populated urban? It explains a lot of the american political divide on this issue (and others). Rural vs urban is a saga that stretches quite a long way back.
Pretty much this.

Also, this happened on a fucking range, yet people are acting as if this kid was shooting in the middle of the street, thanks to "American gun culture" and "the second amendment." Pretty sure everyone's country here has gun ranges...
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 28, 2014, 12:04:54 am
Wise words coming out of your mouth, Xant. Just 50 yards from my place is shooting range (not in the open field though). Local children regularly come there to play with miniguns. Oh wait, that is PC cafe with Call of Duty installed.

Yes there are shooting ranges in every country, and yes, kids do practice there at least once as part of elementary school activity. However, only guns you can fire in there don't use live ammo and aren't automatic. No need for that, because you're training your aiming skills not lethality of firearms.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 12:11:29 am
Wise words coming out of your mouth, Xant. Just 50 yeards from my place is shooting range (not in the open field though). Local children regularly come there to play with miniguns. Oh wait, that is PC cafe with Call of Duty installed.

Yes there are shooting ranges in every country, and yes, kids do practice there at least once as part of elementary school activity. However, only guns you can fire in there don't use live ammo and aren't automatic. No need for that, because you're training your aiming skills not lethality of firearms.
Wat? No live ammo in a shooting range? Which country do you live in, again? And is your claim that there are no shooting ranges with live ammo in your country? If not, how is it relevant that your nearest range doesn't have live ammo..?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Porthos on August 28, 2014, 12:15:48 am
More like "A shooting instructor got killed by his profession".
Children is not his profession :?

Anyway, the video is funny. Thanks for posting it :)
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Falka on August 28, 2014, 12:17:49 am
For someone from a sparsely populated rural area, guns are just one of many things you are introduced to at a young age. Farm kids have been shooting guns and hunting since the invention of the fucking thing.

Sure thing, but a 9-year-old girl with Uzi? That's hilarious.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 28, 2014, 12:26:08 am
Wat? No live ammo in a shooting range? Which country do you live in, again? And is your claim that there are no shooting ranges with live ammo in your country? If not, how is it relevant that your nearest range doesn't have live ammo..?

Of course you don't understand, when your country is the "black sheep" of Europe when it comes to weapon regulations:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation

My country has harsh regulations but no one cares for that and therefore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_gun_ownership9 I'm ashamed.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Franke on August 28, 2014, 12:36:02 am
A firearm is nothing that belongs into the hands of a nine-year-old girl, supervised or not. What the hell is wrong with ppl?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Falka on August 28, 2014, 12:39:23 am
Teaching your kids how to handle guns at a young age is the best way to have them treat firearms with respect and care when they're older too.

To treat a gun with respect you don't need any teaching I think, just a bit of imagination.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 12:39:50 am
Of course you don't understand, when your country is the "black sheep" of Europe when it comes to weapon regulations:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation

My country has harsh regulations but no one cares for that and therefore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_gun_ownership9 I'm ashamed.
Oh my god, do you ever make a post that isn't full of retard? How is Finland the "black sheep"? What does that have to do with the current discussion? What do your wikipedia links have to do with shooting ranges? Rhetorical questions. Answer: nothing.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Thomek on August 28, 2014, 12:59:33 am
The guy doesn't seem to even tell her its gonna be on full auto..  Let it be a "Fun surprise!" perhaps?

I bet anyone would be surprised if their single shot (whatever its called) suddenly turned to full auto...
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Clockworkkiller on August 28, 2014, 01:18:51 am
The guy doesn't seem to even tell her its gonna be on full auto..  Let it be a "Fun surprise!" perhaps?

I bet anyone would be surprised if their single shot (whatever its called) suddenly turned to full auto...

if you actually listen to the video, he does tell her its going to be fully-automatic

If you are gonna teach your kid how to use a gun don't give them a weapon with auto give them a bolt-action or some shit.

she wasnt being "taught" it was her parents taking her to the range to experience something new and unique.


A firearm is nothing that belongs into the hands of a nine-year-old girl, supervised or not. What the hell is wrong with ppl?

why not?

For someone from a densely populated urban area, guns almost always equate to crime. Why would you need to carry a gun or even know how to use one? There's cops, that's what they're there for. Someone with a gun is seen as either a dubious, slightly/very paranoid vigilantee wannabe or a criminal.

except a city is where id want a gun the most. cuz police cant follow me around all day
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 28, 2014, 01:38:23 am
she wasnt being "taught" it was her parents taking her to the range to experience something new and unique.

Just like that one special time when your parents took you to the zoo to experience something new and unique :lol:
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: IR_Kuoin on August 28, 2014, 01:49:26 am
Just like that one special time when your parents took you to the zoo to experience something new and unique :lol:

They took him to the zoo so he could learn about sex by looking at apes, explains the furry.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Butan on August 28, 2014, 01:58:52 am
They took him to the zoo so he could learn about sex by looking at apes, explains the furry.

Thats less funny when you explain it  :P
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Nehvar on August 28, 2014, 02:11:23 am
Yeah, that's Arizona for you. (and natural selection at work)
Title: /
Post by: Chosen1 on August 28, 2014, 03:06:32 am
whatevs
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Prinz_Karl on August 28, 2014, 06:40:59 am
"Alright give me one shot  (shot fired).... alriiight!"
"Alright! Full automatic...... *click*

This is just too cartoonish, like from a Family Guy inbetween-sequence.

I actually feel a bit sad for the instructor, because he wanted make it interesting and have the girl fun (unfortunately in a very stupid and unresponsible way).
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Tibe on August 28, 2014, 06:49:06 am
(click to show/hide)
I had a similar discussion with one other guy once. And all the points were similar. But the thing is, in my country, where the gunlaws are very strict majority of the people living in rural areas do own a gun. Specifically a huntingrifle and mybe a handgun aswell. Responsibly used its a tool for many things and quite viable yes. And im cool with that. I dont get however wtf would a responsible civilian do with 10 assault rifles? Personally this is why im kinda against liberal gunlaws. I can clearly see from where im standing where the laws are strict, that people who really need it and depend on it, own it and people who got no buisness getting one, dont have one. They could get one if they really hassled with it, but why bother if you dont need it.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Christo on August 28, 2014, 06:51:54 am
Just like that one special time when your parents took you to the zoo to experience something new and unique :lol:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Umbra on August 28, 2014, 08:23:39 am
Why do we never hear about things like this happening in Switzerland?

Probably because they got fully automatic weapons at home but get issued ammo at the range and have to be of legal age and military training to practice with it.

But yea, this is what happens when you go full retard and give a little girl an uzi. This guy wasnt killed by a gun, he won the Darwin award.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Havoco on August 28, 2014, 09:41:46 am
Wtf.. Does an Uzi even recoil that way?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Umbra on August 28, 2014, 09:44:20 am
Yes, when a 9 year old girl is spraying bullets in full auto.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Clockworkkiller on August 28, 2014, 12:21:29 pm
Wtf.. Does an Uzi even recoil that way?

No but look closely, when she fires full auto, notice how it completely flies out her  left hand?

If she had a good grip on the gun, and the instructor told her told fire shorter burst, this wouldn't have happened

I had a similar discussion with one other guy once. And all the points were similar. But the thing is, in my country, where the gunlaws are very strict majority of the people living in rural areas do own a gun. Specifically a huntingrifle and mybe a handgun aswell. Responsibly used its a tool for many things and quite viable yes. And im cool with that. I dont get however wtf would a responsible civilian do with 10 assault rifles? Personally this is why im kinda against liberal gunlaws. I can clearly see from where im standing where the laws are strict, that people who really need it and depend on it, own it and people who got no buisness getting one, dont have one. They could get one if they really hassled with it, but why bother if you dont need it.

Don't worry dude, good luck buying an assault rifle in america
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: The_Bloody_Nine on August 28, 2014, 01:13:16 pm
How exactly is it a crime? Teaching your kids how to handle guns at a young age is the best way to have them treat firearms with respect and care when they're older too.

What nonsense, even if the driver license comparison is a bit off, there is truth in it. A nine year old simply cannot judge the consequences of firing guns in the same way as adults. Also if you have anything to do with children or have own kids it is really a very strange idea to teach them shooting out of 2 million other things they can learn, sport, music, theatre whatever.  And last this incident had nothing to do with teaching, I mean look at their site: http://bulletsandburgers.com/
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Angantyr on August 28, 2014, 01:47:07 pm
That website looks like cultural commentary straight out of a Grand Theft Auto game.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Ikarus on August 28, 2014, 02:12:27 pm
It was an accident, but only because it COULD happen, doesn´t mean that it WON´T. These people...

Weird.

I somehow don´t feel sorry after all. That was extremely stupid, selbst Schuld, kein Mitleid. ("Own Fault, No Pity")
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 04:23:34 pm
What nonsense, even if the driver license comparison is a bit off, there is truth in it. A nine year old simply cannot judge the consequences of firing guns in the same way as adults. Also if you have anything to do with children or have own kids it is really a very strange idea to teach them shooting out of 2 million other things they can learn, sport, music, theatre whatever.  And last this incident had nothing to do with teaching, I mean look at their site: http://bulletsandburgers.com/
What nonsense indeed - from you. Driver's license garbage has literally zero logical relevance here. Like I said, UNDER SUPERVISION, so the nine year old's "judgement that isn't as good as an adult's" is meaningless. It's your opinion that it's a strange idea. Others might think teaching them sports is a very strange idea. Just as valid.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: AntiBlitz on August 28, 2014, 04:42:49 pm
Don't worry dude, good luck buying an assault rifle in america

clockwork, i know you live in Maryland, if you need instruction on purchasing a assault rifle, let me know, i can guide you through the steps since Maryland went full retard after the last school shooting propaganda.  Unfortunately, loop holes exist and purchasing assault rifles is still just about the same as before, luckily for me, im "grandfathered" in, and therefore the assault weapons i have, remain mine, even though the laws on them have changed.

Honestly, a better analogy would be alcohol laws in Europe vs Teen drinking in the U.S.  The different cultures give different views, and have their own issues due to them.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Oberyn on August 28, 2014, 05:07:32 pm
Please don't sell assault rifles to the weird furry.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 28, 2014, 05:25:39 pm
Please don't sell assault rifles to the weird furry.

What about a single shot pistol with one bullet?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 05:38:06 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2014205/Girl-10-dies-locking-box-playing-hide-seek.html

https://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/taiwanese-teen-dies-40-hour-diablo-iii-marathon-190451985.html

Two examples of young people dying. One was playing hide and seek, another played video games. Was there an outrage about how children are playing hide and seek too early? That video games are lethal? Nope. Accidents happen in everything.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 28, 2014, 05:47:31 pm
What nonsense indeed - from you. Driver's license garbage has literally zero logical relevance here. Like I said, UNDER SUPERVISION, so the nine year old's "judgement that isn't as good as an adult's" is meaningless. It's your opinion that it's a strange idea. Others might think teaching them sports is a very strange idea. Just as valid.

Being under adult supervision doesn't mean shit if it's a 9 year old with her finger on the trigger, just as how adult supervision doesn't mean shit if it's a 9 year old behind the wheel of a car.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 28, 2014, 05:49:34 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2014205/Girl-10-dies-locking-box-playing-hide-seek.html

https://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/taiwanese-teen-dies-40-hour-diablo-iii-marathon-190451985.html

Two examples of young people dying. One was playing hide and seek, another played video games. Was there an outrage about how children are playing hide and seek too early? That video games are lethal? Nope. Accidents happen in everything.

Except this was an accident with a fully automatic weapon. If you seriously think that doesn't make a difference then I'm not even sure what to say, especially since we're apparently not allowed to make comparisons with driving a car.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 06:37:46 pm
Being under adult supervision doesn't mean shit if it's a 9 year old with her finger on the trigger, just as how adult supervision doesn't mean shit if it's a 9 year old behind the wheel of a car.
Being under adult supervision means everything even if it's a 9 year old with her finger on the trigger. Do you even know how firearms work? It's completely safe if the supervision and instruction is done properly.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 28, 2014, 06:51:58 pm
You're assuming that everything is completely under control and predictable when a small child is under adult supervision, as if the adult has these magical powers that prevent the child from doing anything an adult wouldn't. As if their smaller stature, inability to control emotions, general lack of understanding what consequences are, and short attention span mean is suddenly a non-factor just because there is this thing called "proper adult supervision." Have you ever spent a significant amount of time with small children in a supervisory role? I'm guessing no.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 07:06:20 pm
You're assuming that everything is completely under control and predictable when a small child is under adult supervision, as if the adult has these magical powers that prevent the child from doing anything an adult wouldn't. As if their smaller stature, inability to control emotions, general lack of understanding what consequences are, and short attention span mean is suddenly a non-factor just because there is this thing called "proper adult supervision." Have you ever spent a significant amount of time with small children in a supervisory role? I'm guessing no.
Unless you're suggesting a small child can overpower a grown man, I don't see how any of that is relevant.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Umbra on August 28, 2014, 07:18:23 pm
Being under adult supervision means everything even if it's a 9 year old with her finger on the trigger. Do you even know how firearms work? It's completely safe if the supervision and instruction is done properly.

I wouldnt go as far as to say that it is completely safe. It would be reasonably safe under certain conditions.

You dont need a full-auto weapon to teach gun resposiblity so i assume that you mean a low recoil semi-auto handgun. Then again why would someone take, in this case, a 9 year old to the range to shoot?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: AntiBlitz on August 28, 2014, 07:20:25 pm
You dont need a full-auto weapon to teach gun resposiblity so i assume that you mean a low recoil semi-auto handgun. Then again why would someone take, in this case, a 9 year old to the range to shoot?

who cares, i dont see how that should be part of the discussion.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Umbra on August 28, 2014, 07:21:20 pm
Well yea, i would rather teach a 9 year old not to touch guns at all
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: AntiBlitz on August 28, 2014, 07:25:04 pm
Well yea, i would rather teach a 9 year old not to touch guns at all

thats opinion, i would teach them.

A child at that age knows right from wrong, can determine what is "bad", and what can harm themselves and others.  Its like the old dont touch the stove stuff, the child knows what will harm them, and they wont touch it, because they know.  Its the same with these, this is nothing more then a freak accident.  Shit happens, sorry the guy lost his life, but this isnt some sort of toddler with a firearm.  It was a instructed session that went bad.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 07:28:52 pm
You dont need a full-auto weapon to teach gun resposiblity so i assume that you mean a low recoil semi-auto handgun. Then again why would someone take, in this case, a 9 year old to the range to shoot?
You don't need full auto, no. And why not take a 9 year old to the range to shoot? It's an activity the same as any other. I shot pistols when I was younger than 9, and not at a range either.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Umbra on August 28, 2014, 07:40:52 pm
Guess im just not rural or finnish enough  :lol:
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 28, 2014, 07:53:52 pm
Unless you're suggesting a small child can overpower a grown man, I don't see how any of that is relevant.

What does this have to do with anything? Are you saying that proper adult supervision for a small child shooting a gun means having to physically control the child?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 07:59:20 pm
What does this have to do with anything? Are you saying that proper adult supervision for a small child shooting a gun means having to physically control the child?
Obviously you want to be close enough to physically control the child, especially if you're doing it as your job and you don't personally know them.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Clockworkkiller on August 28, 2014, 09:26:00 pm
clockwork, i know you live in Maryland, if you need instruction on purchasing a assault rifle, let me know, i can guide you through the steps since Maryland went full retard after the last school shooting propaganda.  Unfortunately, loop holes exist and purchasing assault rifles is still just about the same as before, luckily for me, im "grandfathered" in, and therefore the assault weapons i have, remain mine, even though the laws on them have changed.

Honestly, a better analogy would be alcohol laws in Europe vs Teen drinking in the U.S.  The different cultures give different views, and have their own issues due to them.

marylands turning to shit, had plans to buy a SKS when i reached legal age, (ill be 18 in 2 months) but cant anymore. but luckily my grandad apparently snagged a DPMS stripped lower. we're in the midst of building a AR out of it. Although the only way id be able own it is when he passes away and i inherit it.

Also planning to move out and live in a more pro-2nd state, where id be able to obtain a CC easily (but all that's long term plans)
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Turkhammer on August 28, 2014, 09:45:22 pm
The man was sacrificed for the glory of the 2nd Amendment! Hail!

Nonsensical comment.  The 2nd Amendment doesn't say you must give firearms to children.  Try to focus.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 28, 2014, 10:14:37 pm
It would be awesome if Xant and AntiBlitz back up their claims with youtube video. Find a 9 year old, give him/her automatic gun/rifle, instruct them and tell them to fire. Record the video. If everything goes wrong, you'll prove your point. If everything goes as it should, ya know... it's a win-win situation either way.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 10:19:13 pm
It would be awesome if Xant and AntiBlitz back up their claims with youtube video. Find a 9 year old, give him/her automatic gun/rifle, instruct them and tell them to fire. Record the video. If everything goes wrong, you'll prove your point. If everything goes as it should, ya know... it's a win-win situation either way.
So you don't understand English is what you're trying to say? Or is it language in general? Your autism doesn't give you the powers of concentration? That's a shame. What you're saying has no relevance to anything I've said.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 28, 2014, 10:37:45 pm
How exactly is it a crime? Teaching your kids how to handle guns at a young age is the best way to have them treat firearms with respect and care when they're older too.

I hope you will never have children.....
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 28, 2014, 10:49:59 pm
Obviously you want to be close enough to physically control the child, especially if you're doing it as your job and you don't personally know them.

This is the part I don't understand. If the child is not able to properly fire the gun alone then it has no business firing one. There is no educational value in this. I started shooting younger than she did but it was with an air rifle, not a fucking Uzi. Although now that I think about it I have to go thank my parents for not letting me fire a submachine gun on full auto at age 9, unlike those two idiots who have succeeded in destroying their daughter's childhood.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 28, 2014, 11:11:05 pm
This is the part I don't understand. If the child is not able to properly fire the gun alone then it has no business firing one. There is no educational value in this. I started shooting younger than she did but it was with an air rifle, not a fucking Uzi. Although now that I think about it I have to go thank my parents for not letting me fire a submachine gun on full auto at age 9, unlike those two idiots who have succeeded in destroying their daughter's childhood.
That is definitely not an Universal Truth of the Universe. You can't just state things as facts without backing them up in any way and expect them to stand as valid points. It's 100% just an opinion that the kid has no "business firing one." Not to mention that just because you're there to make sure it's safe doesn't mean the kid isn't capable of properly doing it themselves.

To simplify: if I was a range instructor, I would constantly be close enough to intercept anything dangerous. If it was my own kid, I'd do the same until my kid demonstrated that they deserve more autonomy. Same way it was for me, and I was capable of understanding what a firearm was and what not to do even at a young age.

I hope you will never have children.....
Says a guy who shows his son downvotes to make him cry. Disgusting.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: LordBerenger on August 28, 2014, 11:27:10 pm
If you're going to teach a kid how to use firearms...Why give them a fkin Uzi to start with lol..
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Swaggart on August 29, 2014, 12:20:21 am
That is definitely not an Universal Truth of the Universe. You can't just state things as facts without backing them up in any way and expect them to stand as valid points. It's 100% just an opinion that the kid has no "business firing one." Not to mention that just because you're there to make sure it's safe doesn't mean the kid isn't capable of properly doing it themselves.

To simplify: if I was a range instructor, I would constantly be close enough to intercept anything dangerous. If it was my own kid, I'd do the same until my kid demonstrated that they deserve more autonomy. Same way it was for me, and I was capable of understanding what a firearm was and what not to do even at a young age.
Says a guy who shows his son downvotes to make him cry. Disgusting.

No you're right of course. Nothing can possibly go wrong with proper adult supervision.

Especially when it concerns giving this:

(click to show/hide)

a 9 year old.

Anyway, I don't even know why I'm arguing with you.


Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 12:34:51 am
No you're right of course. Nothing can possibly go wrong with proper adult supervision.

Especially when it concerns giving this:

(click to show/hide)

a 9 year old.

Anyway, I don't even know why I'm arguing with you.
Newsflash: something can always go wrong. With everything. Yet, there's tons of kids firing guns in tons of countries every year, yet we don't have to shove aside a handful of dead kids every time we go outside. Freak accident.

I've never said giving kids a full auto uzi was a smart a move.

And yes, you should probably stop arguing with me when you don't even know what your position is. Or mine.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 12:43:06 am
you havn't kids...right ?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 29, 2014, 12:45:24 am
Quote
And yes, you should probably stop arguing with me when you don't even know what your position is. Or mine.

Your position changes when necessary. But you're good at hiding that and that makes you a good troll. I'm somewhat more obvious and that makes me a fool, which means people start to pity me or ignore me if I keep it for too long (people lose interest). You still got high conversion level of posts written : people infuriated. Keep up the good work. Hopefully your trolling will last through another quarter, seems like you're pushing it as of lately.

I know this post is PM material but I like to chat in the open.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 12:48:38 am
Your position changes when necessary. But you're good at hiding that and that makes you a good troll. I'm somewhat more obvious and that makes me a fool, which means people start to pity me or ignore me if I keep it for too long (people lose interest). You still got high conversion level of posts written : people infuriated. Keep up the good work. Hopefully your trolling will last through another quarter, seems like you're pushing it as of lately.

I know this post is PM material but I like to chat in the open.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 12:59:53 am
Xant american dream :

Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 01:03:08 am
Xant familly training

Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Prinz_Karl on August 29, 2014, 01:26:10 am
@Xant Your point of teaching young kids responsibility by exposing them to deadly devices surely is a clever thing. I mean an adult guy could never handle a gun if he didn't learn it from early age on because he would lack responsibility. So only way is to expose those kids at young age with weapons!
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 01:33:43 am
Same for drugs ?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Chosen1 on August 29, 2014, 01:40:17 am
the problem here is irresponsible instruction and parenting, not the right to bear arms
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 01:52:20 am
cunt with gun is more dangerous than unarmed one.....
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 29, 2014, 02:10:59 am
the problem here is irresponsible instruction and parenting, not the right to bear arms

It is, because weapons like Uzi shouldn't be issued to civilians. Which is reality in most countries. But you guys want your government to fear its citizen. so you stockpile all kinds of weaponry despite the fact most of you don't use it. Gabe Newell is an American who realized that, swapped guns with PC games and now rakes in billions from a thing called Steam.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 02:23:34 am
@Xant Your point of teaching young kids responsibility by exposing them to deadly devices surely is a clever thing. I mean an adult guy could never handle a gun if he didn't learn it from early age on because he would lack responsibility. So only way is to expose those kids at young age with weapons!
You might want to read some psychology. Upbringing has a big effect on the human psyche.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Chosen1 on August 29, 2014, 03:15:46 am
But you guys want your government to fear its citizen. so you stockpile all kinds of weaponry despite the fact most of you don't use it.

We don't use those guns because if the government ever tried to subjugate the people, they knew they wouldn't be able to do it without us fighting back. That's why we don't have to use it  :wink:

Quote
Gabe Newell is an American who realized that, swapped guns with PC games and now rakes in billions from a thing called Steam.

u wot
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Clockworkkiller on August 29, 2014, 04:33:28 am
It is, because weapons like Uzi shouldn't be issued to civilians. Which is reality in most countries. But you guys want your government to fear its citizen. so you stockpile all kinds of weaponry despite the fact most of you don't use it. Gabe Newell is an American who realized that, swapped guns with PC games and now rakes in billions from a thing called Steam.

Maximum retardation level reached



@Xant Your point of teaching young kids responsibility by exposing them to deadly devices surely is a clever thing. I mean an adult guy could never handle a gun if he didn't learn it from early age on because he would lack responsibility. So only way is to expose those kids at young age with weapons!

It's not just teaching them about responsibility with a gun, it teaches them responsibility for all things in life.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Prinz_Karl on August 29, 2014, 07:59:42 am

It's not just teaching them about responsibility with a gun, it teaches them responsibility for all things in life.

A kid doesn't need to SHOT a gun to know that it's dangerous and you have be very careful and respectful if you handle it yourself, I'm sure every kid is told that, if they grow up with a gun in their hand or not. What do they teach kids at shooting range that you couldn't teach them at home? It's only HOW to shot a gun, but as kid you don't need to know that, as long as you couldn't fire a gun properly anyway. If you learn it at older age even under 18 years, whatever, as long as your hands aren't adapted to firing water pistols.

I doubt that a kid will approach traffic more carefully or will be able to shop alone if they are taught "this is how you shot the gun, you need it to defend yourself,oh, but also be very careful with it".

I doubt there will be any young kid (under 14 years old or so) that could really defend itself against an adult person (problem is as well that the gun isn't reachable quickly, if it is.... well good parenting, I'm sure there are more accidental deaths , than deaths that could have been prevented if the kid had a gun).

@Xant You can upbring a kid successfully without teaching them how to fire a gun. As it seems it works better in all other countries than in the USA.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: The_Bloody_Nine on August 29, 2014, 11:05:56 am
What nonsense indeed - from you. Driver's license garbage has literally zero logical relevance here. Like I said, UNDER SUPERVISION, so the nine year old's "judgement that isn't as good as an adult's" is meaningless. It's your opinion that it's a strange idea. Others might think teaching them sports is a very strange idea. Just as valid.

Like I said, the comparison is not strictly logical, but the point is that in my opinion (yes, it is an opinion you genious  :D) there are things - like driving cars or shooting guns - that I would under most conditions rather not let children do, regardless of supervision.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 12:13:52 pm
how manu children killed by burglars ?

How many killed by weapons at home ?

how many killed by intrafamillial murderers ?

What is most dangerous ? : WEAPONS !!!!!
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Grumbs on August 29, 2014, 12:56:44 pm
how manu children killed by burglars ?

How many killed by weapons at home ?

how many killed by intrafamillial murderers ?

What is most dangerous ? : WEAPONS !!!!!

It shouldn't just be the bad guys who have guns. I think you either have a society with a history, culture and laws that makes it feasible to live without guns or in a place like America you should have some strict laws to regulate who can own them and what type of guns you can legally own + you should have to take some kind of training to have a permit. About teaching kids about guns..in a society where guns are common place I do think they should be taught about them. Letting them take part by shooting them lets you teach them better about gun safety..they won't listen if you just tell them about it. Firing ranges should probably have strict laws that restrict the types of guns people are allowed to fire. Even adults with shooting experience could have difficulty controlling the recoil of an uzi
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 03:46:01 pm
Don't need weapons to be safe....  weapons at home with kids IS danger.... Whatever history of society is.... that is a reality !
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Boerenlater on August 29, 2014, 03:51:52 pm
Don't need weapons to be safe....  weapons at home with kids IS danger.... Whatever history of society is.... that is a reality !
You never had an unexpected North African guest in your home?  :wink:
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Kafein on August 29, 2014, 04:03:16 pm
You never had an unexpected North African guest in your home?  :wink:

I don't think so.

(click to show/hide)


My personal opinion is that children under 16 (or 18 even) should not be allowed to use guns even under adult supervision. All they need to know is that guns are dangerous and that they should not play with them.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 04:20:05 pm
my friends and half of my familly is north african.... hopefully I have no US gunfatboys in my town...

my children are safe in street even if they drop a ball in a private garden, they can go in and pick it up without being shooted by a cunt with assault firegun !
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: darmaster on August 29, 2014, 04:25:06 pm
ye but tell your kids to visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 29, 2014, 04:49:43 pm
Gun prohibition is communism!

Kafein ist ein Kommunist :P
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 04:56:06 pm
@Xant You can upbring a kid successfully without teaching them how to fire a gun. As it seems it works better in all other countries than in the USA.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 05:06:10 pm
http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp


just read and comment facts....
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Prinz_Karl on August 29, 2014, 08:31:06 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


You are a facepalm.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 29, 2014, 08:31:49 pm
Damn city people discussing guns. Forget those silly full auto rifles. How am I gonna get my moose meat if I don't know how to shoot? Or what am I gonna do if some sick fox comes to my yard to harass my dog every night and infect diseases? Ofc I'm gonna kill it before it harms my dog.

Best time to learn is at relatively young age. You learn to respect the gun (and to respect life!). You earn trust from your parents when they see you understand that it's not a fucking toy, but a tool that should be used carefully. One of my friends was already a pretty damn good hunter at age of 12. He would go to the woods ALONE at that age and he has never had any accidents or anything with guns. Nowadays he's the best hunter I know. You could say his father (and grandfather) taught him well.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 08:41:33 pm
You are a facepalm.
You're context blind. But you're not alone in that on cRPG forums, so I forgive you......................................... my son.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 29, 2014, 08:58:05 pm
Damn city people discussing guns. Forget those silly full auto rifles. How am I gonna get my moose meat if I don't know how to shoot? Or what am I gonna do if some sick fox comes to my yard to harass my dog every night and infect diseases? Ofc I'm gonna kill it before it harms my dog.

Your dog is not an endangered specie, unlike that fox you just killed, you savage! PETA wants a word with you.

Jokes aside, that is how our wildlings deal with things. You Finns are civilized and should know better :P

Save ammo for trespassing Russians, PETA won't bother you in that case.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 29, 2014, 08:59:22 pm
Your dog is not an endangered specie, unlike that fox you just killed, you savage! PETA wants a word with you.

Jokes aside, that is how our wildlings deal with things. You Finns are civilized and should know better :P

Save ammo for trespassing Russians, PETA won't bother you in that case.

PETA can kiss my ass :lol:
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 09:05:33 pm
The only way to kill foxes :

Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 29, 2014, 09:11:40 pm
PETA can kiss my ass :lol:

They'll send oorah marines at your doorstep. Artic monk..erm.. foxes deserve freedom!

Human Winland population (2013 wiki source): 5,451,270
Artic foxes population in Scandinavia: 119 (was 120 before you shot one)

If them foxes could talk, they would scream genocide. Just look at those eyes:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 29, 2014, 09:23:49 pm
The only way to kill foxes :

(click to show/hide)

Could also trap it but you still have to shoot it with something (or beat it to death with an axe). I prefer shooting since it seems more humane way to end an animal's life with minimum suffering. Bow hunting is ofc respectable way but it requires a lot more skill from the hunter to not leave wounded animals to the wild.

They'll send oorah marines at your doorstep. Artic monk..erm.. foxes deserve freedom!

Human Winland population (2013 wiki source): 5,451,270
Artic foxes population in Scandinavia: 119 (was 120 before you shot one)

If them foxes could talk, they would scream genocide. Just look at those eyes:

(click to show/hide)

Leshma there are two kind of foxes in Finland. Regular red foxes and indeed arctic foxes. I would never ever kill a wild arctic fox. It's a majestic creature. I have seen only one of them in my life so yes its extremely rare. One of the reasons why it's so rare is because the bigger red foxes are taking over all their territory. So I could argue that every time I kill a red fox (which is counted in several dozens at this point) I'm helping the endangered arctic fox to survive. Your move PETA.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Yarl on August 29, 2014, 09:32:39 pm
hunting with guns it's so pussy
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 29, 2014, 09:41:15 pm
hunting with guns it's so pussy

Yeah real men kill bears with bare fists!
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 09:48:36 pm
I would never ever kill a wild arctic fox.
Really? Even if it was going to kill your dog?
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 29, 2014, 09:55:56 pm
Really? Even if it was going to kill your dog?

That's highly unlikely since arctic foxes don't come near human population. Not to mention it doesn't have the muscle to kill a hunting dog (if it doesn't have mange... If it has mange it's going to die soon anyways.)

EDIT: So answer to your question.. In the highly unlikely one in a million situation where an arctic fox has a deadly disease and it comes near human population and there are other animals at risk of getting mange, yes then I would probably end it's misery.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 10:00:17 pm
That's highly unlikely since arctic foxes don't come near human population. Not to mention it doesn't have the muscle to kill a hunting dog (if it doesn't have mange... If it has mange it's going to die soon anyways.)
That's sidestepping the question, though. And pretty sure it could kill a puppy.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Umbra on August 29, 2014, 10:03:22 pm
hunting with guns it's so pussy

You only need strong russian hand and half empty bottle of vodka. Davai tovarisch!

))))))))))))))))))))
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Son Of Odin on August 29, 2014, 10:05:11 pm
That's sidestepping the question, though. And pretty sure it could kill a puppy.

Read edit.

I would move the puppy inside rather than shoot an arctic fox. Like I said they avoid human population and would soon be gone.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Yarl on August 29, 2014, 10:17:41 pm
half empty bottle of vodka.
easy mode
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: pepejul on August 29, 2014, 10:22:09 pm
seems to be a fake ?

Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Xant on August 29, 2014, 10:33:41 pm
seems to be a fake ?

No.
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Clockworkkiller on August 30, 2014, 12:11:51 am
If them foxes could talk, they would scream genocide. Just look at those eyes:

your lying

last i checked no one knew what the foxes say
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Butan on August 30, 2014, 06:44:20 pm
last i checked no one knew what the foxes say


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Hit-Girl
Post by: Leshma on August 31, 2014, 12:27:38 am
Stephen Fry is brilliant, perks of being bi-polar :P