Hit-Girl

[Chosen1]

But you guys want your government to fear its citizen. so you stockpile all kinds of weaponry despite the fact most of you don't use it.

We don't use those guns because if the government ever tried to subjugate the people, they knew they wouldn't be able to do it without us fighting back. That's why we don't have to use it 

Gabe Newell is an American who realized that, swapped guns with PC games and now rakes in billions from a thing called Steam.

u wot

[Clockworkkiller]

It is, because weapons like Uzi shouldn't be issued to civilians. Which is reality in most countries. But you guys want your government to fear its citizen. so you stockpile all kinds of weaponry despite the fact most of you don't use it. Gabe Newell is an American who realized that, swapped guns with PC games and now rakes in billions from a thing called Steam.

Maximum retardation level reached

@Xant Your point of teaching young kids responsibility by exposing them to deadly devices surely is a clever thing. I mean an adult guy could never handle a gun if he didn't learn it from early age on because he would lack responsibility. So only way is to expose those kids at young age with weapons!

It's not just teaching them about responsibility with a gun, it teaches them responsibility for all things in life.

[Prinz_Karl]

It's not just teaching them about responsibility with a gun, it teaches them responsibility for all things in life.

A kid doesn't need to SHOT a gun to know that it's dangerous and you have be very careful and respectful if you handle it yourself, I'm sure every kid is told that, if they grow up with a gun in their hand or not. What do they teach kids at shooting range that you couldn't teach them at home? It's only HOW to shot a gun, but as kid you don't need to know that, as long as you couldn't fire a gun properly anyway. If you learn it at older age even under 18 years, whatever, as long as your hands aren't adapted to firing water pistols.

I doubt that a kid will approach traffic more carefully or will be able to shop alone if they are taught "this is how you shot the gun, you need it to defend yourself,oh, but also be very careful with it".

I doubt there will be any young kid (under 14 years old or so) that could really defend itself against an adult person (problem is as well that the gun isn't reachable quickly, if it is.... well good parenting, I'm sure there are more accidental deaths , than deaths that could have been prevented if the kid had a gun).

@Xant You can upbring a kid successfully without teaching them how to fire a gun. As it seems it works better in all other countries than in the USA.

[The_Bloody_Nine]

What nonsense indeed - from you. Driver's license garbage has literally zero logical relevance here. Like I said, UNDER SUPERVISION, so the nine year old's "judgement that isn't as good as an adult's" is meaningless. It's your opinion that it's a strange idea. Others might think teaching them sports is a very strange idea. Just as valid.

Like I said, the comparison is not strictly logical, but the point is that in my opinion (yes, it is an opinion you genious  ) there are things - like driving cars or shooting guns - that I would under most conditions rather not let children do, regardless of supervision.

[pepejul]

how manu children killed by burglars ?

How many killed by weapons at home ?

how many killed by intrafamillial murderers ?

What is most dangerous ? : WEAPONS !!!!!

[Grumbs]

how manu children killed by burglars ?

How many killed by weapons at home ?

how many killed by intrafamillial murderers ?

What is most dangerous ? : WEAPONS !!!!!

It shouldn't just be the bad guys who have guns. I think you either have a society with a history, culture and laws that makes it feasible to live without guns or in a place like America you should have some strict laws to regulate who can own them and what type of guns you can legally own + you should have to take some kind of training to have a permit. About teaching kids about guns..in a society where guns are common place I do think they should be taught about them. Letting them take part by shooting them lets you teach them better about gun safety..they won't listen if you just tell them about it. Firing ranges should probably have strict laws that restrict the types of guns people are allowed to fire. Even adults with shooting experience could have difficulty controlling the recoil of an uzi

[pepejul]

Don't need weapons to be safe....  weapons at home with kids IS danger.... Whatever history of society is.... that is a reality !

[Boerenlater]

Don't need weapons to be safe....  weapons at home with kids IS danger.... Whatever history of society is.... that is a reality !

You never had an unexpected North African guest in your home? 

[Kafein]

You never had an unexpected North African guest in your home? 

I don't think so.

(click to show/hide)

Pepe doesn't live in prison.

My personal opinion is that children under 16 (or 18 even) should not be allowed to use guns even under adult supervision. All they need to know is that guns are dangerous and that they should not play with them.

[pepejul]

my friends and half of my familly is north african.... hopefully I have no US gunfatboys in my town...

my children are safe in street even if they drop a ball in a private garden, they can go in and pick it up without being shooted by a cunt with assault firegun !

[darmaster]

ye but tell your kids to visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Leshma]

Gun prohibition is communism!

Kafein ist ein Kommunist

[Xant]

@Xant You can upbring a kid successfully without teaching them how to fire a gun. As it seems it works better in all other countries than in the USA.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[pepejul]

http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp


just read and comment facts....

[Prinz_Karl]

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

You are a facepalm.