Did you save 50% on the hotels tho?ahaha of course, im going to Vegas baby!
Crazy bastard! Congrats!thanks Mate.
Fuaaarkkkkkk, sick cunt. I'm mirin brah.im actually hitting the gym later today, gonna be sick bro.
We're all gunna make it brah
im actually hitting the gym later today, gonna be sick bro.
Download this and you're good to go!!!!badman compilation this. very nice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L7ZMX3-wRM
Get yourself a 4 legged friend that eats grass and carrots you wont regret it, you got the dosh ! :Dyes but what do i get with 4 riding :D rouncey isn't good is it?
Congratulations! I'd be 35. I was cavalry. No horse is a sword shield.
I can't believe most people here don't consider 4 shield skill as the only useful option that makes sense.
+2 agi for running speed, 4 riding for horse whistling, +2 str for extra HP? Seriously?..
i can't take throwing because no WPF, riding won't be much use with 4, shield i don't know, Tor had shield skill and he didn't like it, luckily he got that free respec when they changed WPF and agi.
since i got to 35 im just going to hope for a free respec from either saving up for one or they give us one lol. my build was finished at 34 because like i said, i never thought 35, so ive not missed out on anything really, respec is in order though.
Shields suck. That's why. Admittedly, shields suck less than two HP, horse whistling or negligible bonus speed.
especially with recentish weight reductions.
5 into Riding. :twisted:So is that an official statement that Nordmen members can cheat and use 5 skillpoints when they actually have 4? :evil:
So is that an official statement that Nordmen memberscando cheat and use 5 skillpoints when they actually have 4? :evil:
It allows for OP ranged with meleesorry for off topic!
You can still be as good at level 30 as an archer as you can be at 35
18/21 5ps 5athls 7wm 6 PD.
The only reason you think level 35 builds are OP is because there is a higher skills cap as ranged and ofc if you play a class for longer, you'll get better.
(click to show/hide)
Now when will you nerf high level Tydeus? Its way more OP than loomsIdeally, I'd like to do one o the following. Rescale XP level requirements such that level 33 or 34 only requires 8-10 mil xp total, but any levels past that point require roughly the same as what they require now. The other idea would be to stop giving attribute points after level 30/31, so that when you level up, you only get the one skill point. This I think, would be the most effective over time.
phew... Im already 35 :PSaxon and many others too!
Ideally, I'd like to do one o the following. Rescale XP level requirements such that level 33 or 34 only requires 8-10 mil xp total, but any levels past that point require roughly the same as what they require now. The other idea would be to stop giving attribute points after level 30/31, so that when you level up, you only get the one skill point. This I think, would be the most effective over time.these are very bold changes, atleast everyone will get a free respec huh? :rolleyes: :)
these are very bold changes, atleast everyone will get a free respec huh? :rolleyes: :)Assuming I can get chadz on board and then harald willing to make the changes(or something along those lines). I doubt this will happen, but it certainly is something that I think needs to be done. Contrary to popular belief, cRPG does still get new players, I just don't believe many of them are "sticking with it." Why should they though? Not only will most people have a sizable level advantage, but they'll also have a loom advantage. Were it just one of them, it might be fine, but both is a little too much.
Assuming I can get chadz on board and then harald willing to make the changes(or something along those lines). I doubt this will happen, but it certainly is something that I think needs to be done. Contrary to popular belief, cRPG does still get new players, I just don't believe many of them are "sticking with it." Why should they though? Not only will most people have a sizable level advantage, but they'll also have a loom advantage. Were it just one of them, it might be fine, but both is a little too much.
Plus the player skill curve. Not many people who play now had to contend with fully loomed level 35's like now (who also have years of experience at the game), most people learned in a much fairer environmentwell what happened to EU_5? peasant server, just change that to a beginner server, and somehow make it balanced.
Would be good if there were more incentives to retire rather than stay at a high level too. Some items should be able to be loomed more than 3 times but they would just get a different looking model maybe
well what happened to EU_5? peasant server, just change that to a beginner server, and somehow make it balanced.Sure, but you have to keep it populated or no one will join it.
Sure, but you have to keep it populated or no one will join it.
Remove "Teams are not fair". That's the number one reason servers get deserted.I actually highly doubt that.
Ideally, I'd like to do one o the following. Rescale XP level requirements such that level 33 or 34 only requires 8-10 mil xp total, but any levels past that point require roughly the same as what they require now. The other idea would be to stop giving attribute points after level 30/31, so that when you level up, you only get the one skill point. This I think, would be the most effective over time.
I actually highly doubt that.
The main cause of the "teams are not fair" shit, is players leaving before the round ends. Even if they're just peasants that leave, due to AB mechanics, they're still currently worth a large amount of points.
I'm probably going to do the same thing. Check out the kite shield and heavy kite shield - they recently had their weight lowered and are much less of a burden than the norman shields are now.Norman shields look proper good though :D, but im glad i took shield because its surprisingly effective.
id say fake a cleaver andcstart bashing shields. :wink:that's not a bad idea actualy, swap my long dagger for a cleaver, hmmm.
Norman shields look proper good though :D, but im glad i took shield because its surprisingly effective.
that's not a bad idea actualy, swap my long dagger for a cleaver, hmmm.
Could take m both 2 slot 2h and shield leaves two item slots open, iirc they are both 0 slot, unldss u care bout the weight. Make all the shielders mad AF 8-)ive done just that, fully geared up now!
Teams are not fair doesn't happen when there are many people online, even if a round is incredibly one-sided. We had a 18 vs 40 once and teams are not fair didn't catch it. It doesn't serve its intended purpose at all.
i'm 24 mil from 35 myself, hopefully once i hit it the shame will be enough to motivate me to leave this place forever
Also, extra secret tip:oh wow, i did not know, this will help a lot actually. thanks bro!(click to show/hide)