cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: Dutchydave on March 11, 2014, 09:32:10 pm

Title: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Dutchydave on March 11, 2014, 09:32:10 pm
Im pretty sure this has already been pointed out but I just wanted to add my 2cents.

If the devs where trying to balance out this strat to help the smaller clans then it is clearly an epic fail. Maybe they wanted to empower the larger clans even more?

At least last strat everyone could afford the plate armys, this strat the longer it go's the more advantage the larger clans will have. By the last month the larger clans will be running around in plate and the small clans will be lucky to have mail.

Anyway thanks devs for guaranteeing a shit ton of one sided battles and wars
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 11, 2014, 09:33:57 pm
There really isn't a way to balance strat so that the size of a group playing it is more or less irrelevant.

I guess unless you made each faction have a maximum of 5 playable heroes that could move around the map or something. That'd be pretty shitty.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Carthan on March 11, 2014, 09:56:08 pm
I don't want to jump to any conclusions here, but it seems like having more people than the other guy gives you an advantage in just about everything.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 11, 2014, 09:59:14 pm
This should be under Realism Discussion.  Next we can discuss the effects of a salary cap on a baseball tea,.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Fips on March 11, 2014, 10:00:36 pm
The circlejerk on EU is quite big, too(Big, as in, EU strat was over before it began because certain diplomatic relations will never end). But i fail to see how a mechanic could actually prevent them from happening. Even if smaller clans would get more out of something, the big clans could just form plenty of small clans that work together to get the max out of their alliances. Also this is the wrong part of the forum for strat talk.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Knute on March 11, 2014, 10:03:31 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Kafein on March 11, 2014, 10:21:57 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Strategus right now is exactly like that except it's the big fishes all grouping up together against a few disorganised small fishes.

The circlejerk on EU is quite big, too(Big, as in, EU strat was over before it began because certain diplomatic relations will never end). But i fail to see how a mechanic could actually prevent them from happening. Even if smaller clans would get more out of something, the big clans could just form plenty of small clans that work together to get the max out of their alliances. Also this is the wrong part of the forum for strat talk.


It's not a fatality, the game just lacks incentives to do anything else.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: phnxhdsn on March 11, 2014, 10:59:37 pm
^That is a good idea,
SHOGUNATE SHALL RISE AGAIN MUHAHAHA :D
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: dreadnok on March 12, 2014, 03:11:20 am
^That is a good idea,
SHOGUNATE SHALL RISE AGAIN MUHAHAHA :D

i gave you a + because of your awesome sig
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Zaharist on March 12, 2014, 07:43:13 am
Strategus right now is exactly like that except it's the big fishes all grouping up together against a few disorganised small fishes.

Any examples of big fishes grouping up against disorganised small fishes (this Strat)?
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: ArysOakheart on March 12, 2014, 08:37:54 am
Any examples of big fishes grouping up against disorganised small fishes (this Strat)?

Yea, it's called the Freedom Perch vs the Northern Perch.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Vibe on March 12, 2014, 09:14:53 am
Imo, the problem is not that smaller clans are unable to compete, they shouldn't be able to(at least for claiming villages/castles/towns), medieval times size/numbers always mattered. Problem is there is nothing for them to do, there is no incentive to just be in a small group in strategus. They need more stuff they can do other than attack a trader here and there and then not know what to do with their gold.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 12, 2014, 09:54:48 am
They can do lots of things:

Scouts, raid traders and villages, be interceptors and lock down enemies - either sell their services if they are good or just help out and get some stuff for it

Send a job application to us  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Vibe on March 12, 2014, 10:01:16 am
They can do lots of things:

Scouts, raid traders and villages, be interceptors and lock down enemies - either sell their services if they are good or just help out and get some stuff for it

Send a job application to us  :mrgreen:

To what end? What is the goal? Amassing gold? What is that going to get them other than better gear? They need incentive. Big groups get towns, castles, villages, titles, all kinds of notable stuff.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 12, 2014, 10:10:45 am
To what end? What is the goal? Amassing gold? What is that going to get them other than better gear? They need incentive. Big groups get towns, castles, villages, titles, all kinds of notable stuff.

Ask them, madmanjack, gimest de gyrst, tybalt, boerenlater, lemon, elkska, brigadier and so on - more coming and asking if they can help out - no promises of gold, no nothing. We promise to give what they need if we can in terms of resources. And we will later today transfer the village of Ushkuru, so they can trade freely there and have a safe haven. Torben, will be the one managing it and it will be under the protection of us.

Incentive? Differs I guess, teamplay, ability to kick some big clannuts when these guys work together, back up from a clan, possibility to get info about traders they can raid and so on.

Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Erasmas on March 12, 2014, 11:08:21 am
To what end? What is the goal? Amassing gold? What is that going to get them other than better gear? They need incentive. Big groups get towns, castles, villages, titles, all kinds of notable stuff.

Grey Order was started by one guy. It took some time and effort to make it visible on the map - to get first village. It took a lot more time and effort to make it a clan that holds a castle. Holding a city was a dream for a long time, and seemed impossible in the world full of Templars, Mercs and other big clans. And there was far less incentives in first iterations of Strat.

It turned out it that things are difficult, but not impossible. Nothing changed in that respect in Strat 5.
 
Just get your shit together guys.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Vibe on March 12, 2014, 11:23:52 am
Grey Order was started by one guy. It took some time and effort to make it visible on the map - to get first village. It took a lot more time and effort to make it a clan that holds a castle. Holding a city was a dream for a long time, and seemed impossible in the world full of Templars, Mercs and other big clans. And there was far less incentives in first iterations of Strat.

It turned out it that things are difficult, but not impossible. Nothing changed in that respect in Strat 5.
 
Just get your shit together guys.

what, how is that related to small clans, you are no small clan or are you advising small clans to get more people, because that's not what the discussion was about, or at least what I was saying
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 12, 2014, 11:40:18 am
what, how is that related to small clans, you are no small clan or are you advising small clans to get more people, because that's not what the discussion was about, or at least what I was saying

We are not small - but alot of small clans and randomers can work together in a coordinated way and get much done, duringh our war against the Shoggies we have had lots of help from the little man, the little man is able to do stuff our members cant, and get something out of it. So, you are saying there is nothing for them to do and i say there is plenty - sign up to help one side in a war as an independent scout or raider - you are independent, small and free to do what you want but can still be part of bigger things. Get payed to do so or get good raiding possibilities through the intel you get in the war.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 12, 2014, 12:07:50 pm
I shouldn't advise you this, but the whole eastern part of the map should fill Grandmom & Kinngrimm orders. These two guys are very experienced organizers and great leaders. Do what they tell you and win. You have potential, but first you have to sort out this mess in internal relationships.

BTW - stop QQ - we don't give fuck about your stinky tears - there is no mercy.

FU & good luck.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 12, 2014, 12:10:45 pm
I shouldn't advise you this, but the whole eastern part of the map should fill Grandmom & Kinngrimm orders. These two guys are very experienced organizers and great leaders. Do what they tell you and win. You have potential, but first you have to sort out this mess in internal relationships.

BTW - stop QQ - we don't give fuck about your stinky tears - there is no mercy.

FU & good luck.

Thanks Harpag, and you are not such a bad organiser yourself  :lol:

And again, to stay out of the "internal" problems we havent allied to anyone this round and we wont - people are free to help us and we help them, - but only as long as they fight Grey Order and puppets.....we are alone in terms of alliances

Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 12, 2014, 01:13:37 pm
..... as long as they fight Grey Order and puppets...

Fu Grandmom, if our friends are puppets, you are:
(click to show/hide)

...we havent allied to anyone this round and we wont...

Show me my diplomatic thread  :wink:
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Osiris on March 12, 2014, 02:02:57 pm
I shouldn't advise you this, but the whole eastern part of the map should fill Grandmom & Kinngrimm orders. These two guys are very experienced organizers and great leaders. Do what they tell you and win. You have potential, but first you have to sort out this mess in internal relationships.

BTW - stop QQ - we don't give fuck about your stinky tears - there is no mercy.

FU & good luck.

problem with that is a lot of people don't consider kinn any better than evil UIF :P
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 12, 2014, 02:13:24 pm
problem with that is a lot of people don't consider kinn any better than evil UIF :P

Why? This is not true. He is much better than the evil UIF... I don't understand what I did wrong...
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Fips on March 12, 2014, 02:18:18 pm
problem with that is a lot of people don't consider kinn any better than evil UIF :P

He is still so much less of a threat, simply by looking at the numbers of players his UIF has.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 12, 2014, 02:36:42 pm

Show me my diplomatic thread  :wink:

If you cant find your diplomacy thread - ask somebody else to show it to you, Im busy planning  how we will strike you  :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Tomas on March 12, 2014, 08:26:36 pm
2nd/1st highest renown value in EU last Strat went to Osiris, a lone wolf for most of the end of Strat.

Renown last start was completely bugged and no reflection all of anything.

@Grandmom and Harpag

Nobody should be forced to ally into a huge block just to compete in Strat. But likewise nobody should be forced to split up a successful alliance just because it became too big. 

We had a game that allowed both small and large clans/alliances to compete on a map for over 15months but sadly we threw it away in favour of game where player numbers mean it was over before it even started :(
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 12, 2014, 08:43:50 pm
Renown last start was completely bugged and no reflection all of anything.

@Grandmom and Harpag

Nobody should be forced to ally into a huge block just to compete in Strat. But likewise nobody should be forced to split up a successful alliance just because it became too big. 

We had a game that allowed both small and large clans/alliances to compete on a map for over 15months but sadly we threw it away in favour of game where player numbers mean it was over before it even started :(

No forcing anyone to do anything Tomas - ask around and you will find out
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Ronin on March 12, 2014, 11:25:29 pm
In other news HRE and Eques are now at war i hear xD so GG Eastern Superfriends, since we all know that at least one of those factions is part of a northern superalliance that will now be totally distracted from the bigger picture unless they demonstrate an uncharacteristic ability to let bygones be bygones and declare peace.

Well, if it's just Kalmar and their more reliable friends fighting the fight then it should still be a fight to remember.
This will be a strat to remember :)
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 13, 2014, 12:03:45 pm
In other news HRE and Eques are now at war i hear xD so GG Eastern Superfriends, since we all know that at least one of those factions is part of a northern superalliance that will now be totally distracted from the bigger picture unless they demonstrate an uncharacteristic ability to let bygones be bygones and declare peace.

Well, if it's just Kalmar and their more reliable friends fighting the fight then it should still be a fight to remember.

I blame Fips  :wink:
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Osiris on March 13, 2014, 01:53:21 pm
Gimmie troops and equipment so i can continue mah war with the fenris!
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Corsair831 on March 13, 2014, 01:53:57 pm
IMO there should be a limit to around 30-40 players in one clan, and after the 10 month strategus is finished, the clan which controls the most land (cities give 3 points, castles 2, villages 1), gets a free loompoint for every player.

encourages bigger clans to fight amongst themselves.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: YnScN on March 13, 2014, 01:56:56 pm
IMO there should be a limit to around 30-40 players in one clan, and after the 10 month strategus is finished, the clan which controls the most land (cities give 3 points, castles 2, villages 1), gets a free loompoint for every player.

encourages bigger clans to fight amongst themselves.

They'll just create a big faction and invite everybody after they eliminate other folks. It wont work.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Corsair831 on March 13, 2014, 02:03:08 pm
They'll just create a big faction and invite everybody after they eliminate other folks. It wont work.

yeah, i hate giant alliances tbh, they force smaller clans into wars they don't want to be a part of

kalmar and half of the other clans in the game attacked us because we're friendly with UIF, like dragging us into their war ...

mega clans suck .. zz
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: YnScN on March 13, 2014, 02:14:29 pm
yeah, i hate giant alliances tbh, they force smaller clans into wars they don't want to be a part of

kalmar and half of the other clans in the game attacked us because we're friendly with UIF, like dragging us into their war ...

mega clans suck .. zz
Welcome to real world :D
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Zaharist on March 13, 2014, 02:31:06 pm
yeah, i hate giant alliances tbh, they force smaller clans into wars they don't want to be a part of

kalmar and half of the other clans in the game attacked us because we're friendly with UIF, like dragging us into their war ...

mega clans suck .. zz

Is it a joke? ^^
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 13, 2014, 03:19:46 pm
yeah, i hate giant alliances tbh, they force smaller clans into wars they don't want to be a part of

kalmar and half of the other clans in the game attacked us because we're friendly with UIF, like dragging us into their war ...

mega clans suck .. zz

Tell me who forces you to be friendly to us, and he will regret that he was born ^^
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 13, 2014, 03:23:49 pm
Tell me who forces you to be friendly to us, and he will regret that he was born ^^

Probably us
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Cicero on March 13, 2014, 03:56:20 pm
who cares small clans ?

be a vassal use diplomacy ; we started bashibazouk with 20 members and made good choices meanwhile we fought best in our alliances battles so people started know our fame.

After 6 months we had 100 members and totally active playing.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Bittersteel on March 13, 2014, 05:37:52 pm
Haha
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 13, 2014, 05:52:21 pm
who cares small clans ?

be a vassal use diplomacy ; we started bashibazouk with 20 members and made good choices meanwhile we fought best in our alliances battles so people started know our fame.

After 6 months we had 100 members and totally active playing.

:O  Cicero miraculously raised from the dead as messiah of small big clans ! Hello you old devil  :)
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Snufalufagus on March 13, 2014, 07:17:27 pm
This is the way all sandbox pvp works. Big groups of cowards band together against a few, just like in real life. The world is run by cowards and bureaucrats.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Corsair831 on March 14, 2014, 04:51:02 pm
love how there's 5 or 6 certain people who are following me around the forum downvoting every post i make, real mature guys
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 14, 2014, 05:15:35 pm
Not me!  :D
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Garem on March 14, 2014, 05:18:28 pm
Limiting the clan size would never work for all the good (and some bad) reasons mentioned before.

Having clans join one of the "Kingdoms" - think Swadia, Vaegir, and Saracen - having official meta-clans, would probably be a better way. You can ONLY sign up for battles with your kingdom OR for either of the opposing kingdoms when they fight. In other words, never against your own Kingdom.

And factions could only accept clans or characters so long as it didn't push them beyond 20% the size of the smallest ingdom. OR impose an incentive for joining smaller Kingdoms, such as a significant XP bonus for joining and fighting for the underdog kingdom in both cRPG and Strategus (active so long as you participate in Strategus battles to ensure actual play).

This gives new players and lone wolves some safe haven, automatic allies.

Rules for in-fighting might even be put in place - as is historically accurate and fun. Can only be done with sufficiently high renown for example.

I could go on an on fleshing the nuances of how this would work, avoiding loopholes, etc. but ahhh well.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Zaharist on March 14, 2014, 06:20:10 pm
but ahhh well.

sweet dreams...  :cry:
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: BlindGuy on March 14, 2014, 06:28:48 pm
I shouldn't advise you this, but the whole eastern part of the map should fill Grandmom & Kinngrimm orders. These two guys are very experienced organizers and great leaders.

OMFG thats funny.

EDIT: I came back to write this: WHY should small clans have any chances? Strat is kind of a combo of two things: Multiplayer Mount and Blade/Warband and a historical semi realtime strategy game. In neither of those things will a small band do well.

I don't understand the original post at all tbh: WHAT do you WANT to achieve? To hold fiefs? TAKE THEM, you have what you can hold, and that's IT. Look for a border fief between two larger factions that are warring, TAKE the fief from one side and tell the other side that you welcome them to use it safely and if theres anything you can do to help them. Then backstab them later if you can. DO whatever you want.

Grey Order was started by one guy. It took some time and effort to make it visible on the map - to get first village. It took a lot more time and effort to make it a clan that holds a castle. Holding a city was a dream for a long time, and seemed impossible in the world full of Templars, Mercs and other big clans. And there was far less incentives in first iterations of Strat.

It turned out it that things are difficult, but not impossible. Nothing changed in that respect in Strat 5.
 
Just get your shit together guys.

This is funny dude, cause at no time has Templars had over 10 active strategus players :D You guys have.... well individual players who knows, but you have never been outnumbered in CD-keys, or active players. Its not hard to zerg the map, you have NO idea what it is to have few players :D
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: buba on March 14, 2014, 07:27:24 pm
Grey Order was started by one guy. It took some time and effort to make it visible on the map - to get first village. It took a lot more time and effort to make it a clan that holds a castle. Holding a city was a dream for a long time, and seemed impossible in the world full of Templars, Mercs and other big clans. And there was far less incentives in first iterations of Strat.

It turned out it that things are difficult, but not impossible. Nothing changed in that respect in Strat 5.
 
Just get your shit together guys.


Oh fucking lol, so your telling us how to play strat are you? GO got caught cheating with the whole CD key thing not once.... but twice.
It nearly wiped you off the map last strat round.
And that was when you got caught, god knows how long you manage to fuck a game like this up and cheat cheat cheat to get what you wanted.
Get our shit together? you mean buy tons of CD keys and win? haha!

You know I have been in coalition last round, and I dont hate anyone of the UIF, except GO.
For ruining the game for every one because GO thinks their entitled to cheat in such a small community based game.

"Grey Order was started by one guy"  one guy with many many CD keys for all we know.

I really really do not understand why you would cheat in a modded game like CPRG/strat, whats the enjoyment then? and don't go everyone does, because most do not.

Honestly, its a question i would like to see an answer too.
Is it because exploiting stuff and / or cheating is part of the game for you guys? 

 

Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 14, 2014, 07:53:30 pm
To Eastern Europeans, legal is anything you can get away with. 
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 14, 2014, 09:06:06 pm
"Grey Order was started by one guy"  one guy with many many CD keys for all we know.

+ extra horns, hooves and smell of sulfur pff - I've never had more than one key you moron - don't quote trolling without understanding of context hehe

To Eastern Europeans, legal is anything you can get away with. 

for sure fat ass cuz NA  :wink:
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Erasmas on March 15, 2014, 11:29:31 pm

Oh fucking lol, so your telling us how to play strat are you? GO got caught cheating with the whole CD key thing not once.... but twice.
It nearly wiped you off the map last strat round.
And that was when you got caught, god knows how long you manage to fuck a game like this up and cheat cheat cheat to get what you wanted.
Get our shit together? you mean buy tons of CD keys and win? haha!

You know I have been in coalition last round, and I dont hate anyone of the UIF, except GO.
For ruining the game for every one because GO thinks their entitled to cheat in such a small community based game.

"Grey Order was started by one guy"  one guy with many many CD keys for all we know.

I really really do not understand why you would cheat in a modded game like CPRG/strat, whats the enjoyment then? and don't go everyone does, because most do not.

Honestly, its a question i would like to see an answer too.
Is it because exploiting stuff and / or cheating is part of the game for you guys?

Not a single word of what you wrote is true. Enough said.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Osiris on March 16, 2014, 12:56:15 pm
nope none of that is true


http://forum.melee.org/strategus-general-discussion/grey-order-strat-announcement/
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 16, 2014, 01:07:25 pm
nope none of that is true


http://forum.melee.org/strategus-general-discussion/grey-order-strat-announcement/

Didnt know this existed, interessting reading......
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Erasmas on March 16, 2014, 02:03:06 pm
nope none of that is true

Nothing indeed. The buba's post repeats generally spread lies without a small bit of understanding what really happened and what was the problem. Read the post you mention carefully - it really shows what was the problem.

[EDIT]

And let me add one more thing fort people that do not remember Strat 1 or 2: At that time rules for Strat were forged. Not many things  were certain. Many bans were casted for various reasons. Now most of guys learned their lesson and the rules are more or less universal, albeit still unclear in many cases.

It is easy to say "GO are cheaters, UIF guys are evil, they are all exploiters" and dismiss good advice. I will repeat again - get your shit together. The bottom line is - Strat needs dedication, organization and good relations with people. And having that anything is possible.
 
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: BattalGazi on March 16, 2014, 02:12:08 pm
Here is a suggestion to allow small clans to be able survive and actually be effective on the balance of strat. Please contribute if you feel it's a good one.

http://forum.melee.org/suggestions-corner/faction-types-kingdoms-vassals-bandits/

Cheers
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Osiris on March 16, 2014, 02:30:16 pm
Nothing indeed. The buba's post repeats generally spread lies without a small bit of understanding what really happened and what was the problem. Read the post you mention carefully - it really shows what was the problem.

[EDIT]

And let me add one more thing fort people that do not remember Strat 1 or 2: At that time rules for Strat were forged. Not many things  were certain. Many bans were casted for various reasons. Now most of guys learned their lesson and the rules are more or less universal, albeit still unclear in many cases.

It is easy to say "GO are cheaters, UIF guys are evil, they are all exploiters" and dismiss good advice. I will repeat again - get your shit together. The bottom line is - Strat needs dedication, organization and good relations with people. And having that anything is possible.

he wasn't talking strat 1 or 2, he was talking about the strat where rules about multi accounting and logging into other users strat accounts was quite clearly against the rules but you guys did it anyway then moaned that it shouldn't be against the rules. The majority of cheating was from VR and Union but there were a fair few GO bans too. If lessons were learned and it doesnt happen anymore that's good but you cant pretend it didn't happen.


which rules are still unclear for you btw?
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Erasmas on March 16, 2014, 02:45:18 pm
If lessons were learned and it doesnt happen anymore that's good but you cant pretend it didn't happen.

Fine, but do not forget about the context of the whole story too. Which was not the show of utmost objectivity and transparency.

What annoys me is not the fact that someone brings this well exploited topic again, but that I really wish to encourage newcomers and powers-to-be to fight for it, to work on it  because it pays off. And I do not want to let one dickhead to drag the folks attention from that.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Osiris on March 16, 2014, 02:53:58 pm
well to be fair chadz explained how it was done you just don't believe him :D

As for new comers it really isn't possible to play strat unless you form part of a large alliance or turn up with 30 other new comers.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: buba on March 16, 2014, 07:46:41 pm
Fine, but do not forget about the context of the whole story too. Which was not the show of utmost objectivity and transparency.

What annoys me is not the fact that someone brings this well exploited topic again, but that I really wish to encourage newcomers and powers-to-be to fight for it, to work on it  because it pays off. And I do not want to let one dickhead to drag the folks attention from that.

I was a newcomer in strat 4, i worked hard, I fought for it, and then found out that a lot of people cheated to get an advantage, and  of those people that got hit by the ban wave a fair amount where GO. Call it old hurt but to see a GO telling others to play hard and fair rubbed me the wrong way.
 
I mean no clan can claim they never did something wrong,  but multi accounting on that scale?
Smaller clans need to fight for it? I completely agree with harpag and Erasmas.
And from what I can see they are, I hope GO did learned their lesson and will not control god knows how many caravans and armies by one player while gold still matters this early in strat.

Ps: I never said all UIF are evil, actually I respect UIF for playing strat to win and enjoyed the challenge to face them in the last strat.
     

 
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Erasmas on March 16, 2014, 08:34:40 pm
well to be fair chadz explained how it was done you just don't believe him :D

Well, the circumstances we saw at that time were quite against this explanation.

I was a newcomer in strat 4, i worked hard, I fought for it, and then found out that a lot of people cheated to get an advantage, and  of those people that got hit by the ban wave a fair amount where GO. Call it old hurt but to see a GO telling others to play hard and fair rubbed me the wrong way.

So you have no idea what happened at that time, but you feel you are in position to post some hardcore critique... Well, I don't know if I would be so brave.

5 or 6. This is the number of guys banned in GO at that time. Fair amount? Judge for yourself.
 
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: imisshotmail on March 16, 2014, 09:29:35 pm
well to be fair chadz explained how it was done you just don't believe him :D

It was not done "anonymously" as stated, that is for sure. Plenty of people who multiaccounted back then didn't get banned, and there are still people who do it who aren't banned.

I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)



Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Erasmas on March 16, 2014, 09:37:18 pm
I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)

QED. Thank you.

[EDIT]

Anyways, the case is closed for me. And clearly for devs too, and I respect that.  I understand the sentiments, but it would be much better if we all concentrate on current affairs.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Harpag on March 16, 2014, 11:12:06 pm
It was not done "anonymously" as stated, that is for sure. Plenty of people who multiaccounted back then didn't get banned, and there are still people who do it who aren't banned.

I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)

I don't know you, but thank you, thank you, thank you very much. I knew that all of us have been cheated but I had no proof. I have no injuries, I just fuck it now, but let no one tries it with us again.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Fips on March 16, 2014, 11:21:50 pm
http://forum.melee.org/strategus-general-discussion/grey-order-strat-announcement/msg670368/#msg670368

Just throwin it out there about all the boohoo ban wave was biased.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Keshian on March 16, 2014, 11:35:25 pm
It was not done "anonymously" as stated, that is for sure. Plenty of people who multiaccounted back then didn't get banned, and there are still people who do it who aren't banned.

I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)


Lol, the "didn't check anyone else" was referring to me dipshit - hence the reference to FCC.  Then I proved my innocence and was unbanned.  Had nothing to do with UIF.  Funny all these grey order guys congratulating you. 

Guys you should know imisshotmail constantly makes shit up.  hes a british player who plays primarily in NA.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Osiris on March 16, 2014, 11:37:42 pm
no clearly anti uif paid chadz to ban them
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 16, 2014, 11:43:37 pm
2nd/1st highest renown value in EU last Strat went to Osiris, a lone wolf for most of the end of Strat. Currently in EU the 2nd highest renown is another lone wolf.

Incentivise top renown somehow? Because large factions spread out their renown amongst members when stomping, whereas it looks like loners get a higher proportion of it by fighting all their own battles. That looks like sufficient incentive, if a large faction stomps and 'wins' then they've got nothing to do, no renown unless they attack their old allies, whereas anyone who keeps raiding and trolling them after they gain scumbag victory would get crazy amounts of renown.


highest renown went to whoever gear bugged the hardest

yep you got it
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: imisshotmail on March 16, 2014, 11:55:44 pm

Lol, the "didn't check anyone else" was referring to me dipshit - hence the reference to FCC.  Then I proved my innocence and was unbanned.  Had nothing to do with UIF. 

no this was in a private conversation, not in a public IRC, I think i'd know what it was about. It was before you got banned even.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Little Lord Lollipop on March 17, 2014, 12:51:49 am
One positive change would be to give strat ticks for x1 multi's. Smaller clans are unable to banner stack to maintain a multi and their members typically spend more time on an x1.  This would be an easy change to implement and would give smaller clans a minor boost in strategus.
Title: Re: Epic fail to small clans
Post by: Zaharist on March 17, 2014, 08:31:20 am
may be less talking more raiding?