November 1st.And Dead Rising 3 exclusive? That sucks. DR2 is an awesome fun coop game on PC. That blows! :cry:
USA: 499$
Euro: 499€
Britmy old friends: 425 funny money.
Dead Rising 3 has to be the worst and the most stupid game I've ever seen.See... I think TitanFall is just another Battlefield/CoD/BoringAss shooter. Dead Rising was always "special" =)
On the other hand TitanFall looks frakkin awesome!
Man, Metal Gear looks epic now. PS exclusive again, right?It's from the XBOX one E3 media presentation...
And I didnt say DR 3 will be wtfawesome with sauce. I said DR 2 is an awesome coop game for PC. I hope that DR 3 keeps the humor, otherwise it's not interesting for me tbh.
Only humour I see here is me laughing my ass of how bad this game is :P
Probably the same as Battlefield but with SW vehicles and characters.
The division looks.. quite amazing :P
Pay for MP really sucks, I don't play consoles that much.
Guess I won't buy a new gen console at all then
Why? The combat looked really crap. Guns without any balls (lame sounds and feedback) and having to shoot enemies with ~10 bullets before they go down, constant annoying chatter during a firefight (wtf?).. and at all other times. Other than that they only walk on a street. The graphics looked OK, but the screen is super cluttered with all kinds of stuff.
Ok I am a huge fan of WW2 shooters but it did get stale, then came modern warfare games and I was happy. But seriously now it's fucking overdone, I see enough of modern war anyways on headlines and shit! Also future warfare is getting quite boring too. Just bring back WW2, hell I wouldn't mind if they made a Call of Duty : Civil War!
From what i understand, it's an online game.
Maybe it's a bug I think, but no. Next time I deliberately press the wrong button. The kill goes ahead, no consequences. Then I try hitting no buttons whatsoever. The kill goes ahead. I put the controller on the table in front of me, the kill goes ahead. (...) I ask one of the Crytek people hovering at the booth – is this a bug? Why am I completing kills when I hit the wrong button prompt? Or, worse, no button at all. Turns out it was a deliberate design choice. (...) "We don’t want the player to feel frustrated,' I am told.
Turns out the XBONE games demo'ing at E3 were running on high spec Win7 PCs; with very new GTX 780's no less. (650USD GPU) So you probably can't expect the same visual fidelity from the actual console. Pretty hilarious that they were using Windows 7 instead of 8 considering the XBONE runs on a version of 8. Not even Microsoft uses Windows 8!
Turns out the XBONE games demo'ing at E3 were running on high spec Win7 PCs; with very new GTX 780's no less. (650USD GPU) So you probably can't expect the same visual fidelity from the actual console. Pretty hilarious that they were using Windows 7 instead of 8 considering the XBONE runs on a version of 8. Not even Microsoft uses Windows 8!Such a farce, lol. Are MS really doing this, or is this some sort of elaborate joke?
Turns out the XBONE games demo'ing at E3 were running on high spec Win7 PCs; with very new GTX 780's no less. (650USD GPU) So you probably can't expect the same visual fidelity from the actual console. Pretty hilarious that they were using Windows 7 instead of 8 considering the XBONE runs on a version of 8. Not even Microsoft uses Windows 8!
Such a farce, lol. Are MS really doing this, or is this some sort of elaborate joke?
Turns out the XBONE games demo'ing at E3 were running on high spec Win7 PCs; with very new GTX 780's no less. (650USD GPU) So you probably can't expect the same visual fidelity from the actual console. Pretty hilarious that they were using Windows 7 instead of 8 considering the XBONE runs on a version of 8. Not even Microsoft uses Windows 8!
Such a farce, lol. Are MS really doing this, or is this some sort of elaborate joke?
I think it's a fairly common procedure. You develop a game on PC after all and you need a strong PC. Later comes optimization for less capable hardware. Games they have shown are 6 months far away from being finished.
Of course, they won't talk about it in public because average gamer is a dumbass and it's hard to explain anything to him.
Lol so seriously you can just sit back and watch it? :|Since we're all more or less playing one of the most ugly games alive... we all know by now gameplay > graphics any day.
That said it is a nice looking game.
I think it's a fairly common procedure. You develop a game on PC after all and you need a strong PC. Later comes optimization for less capable hardware. Games they have shown are 6 months far away from being finished.
Of course, they won't talk about it in public because average gamer is a dumbass and it's hard to explain anything to him.
The way AMD designed the core will allow it to do things that current PC's can't.
The real reason to get excited about a PS4 is what Sony as a company does with the OS and system libraries as a platform, and what this enables 1st party studios to do, when they make PS4-only games. If PS4 has a real-time OS, with a libGCM style low level access to the GPU, then the PS4 1st party games will be years ahead of the PC simply because it opens up what is possible on the GPU. Note this won't happen right away on launch, but once developers tool up for the platform, this will be the case. As a PC guy who knows hardware to the metal, I spend most of my days in frustration knowing damn well what I could do with the hardware, but what I cannot do because Microsoft and IHVs wont provide low-level GPU access in PC APIs. One simple example, drawcalls on PC have easily 10x to 100x the overhead of a console with a libGCM style API....
I could continue here, but I'm not, by now you get the picture, launch titles will likely be DX11 ports, so perhaps not much better than what could be done on PC. However if Sony provides the real-time OS with libGCM v2 for GCN, one or two years out, 1st party devs and Sony's internal teams like the ICE team, will have had long enough to build up tech to really leverage the platform.
I'm excited for what this platform will provide for PS4-only 1st party titles and developers who still have the balls to do a non-portable game this next round....
Since we're all more or less playing one of the most ugly games alive...
so your saying the reason we won't see this on PC's is because of the OS? i mean if it works that well it would be adapted to pc otherwise.
but yeah i've always felt like we could do with an OS that is specifically for gaming, but that also doesnt suck.
I always knew Crytek was only about graphics and never about gameplayI think this is a hugely unfair statement. Have you even played Crysis? People always seem to assume it is just a pretty picture, but I found the gameplay very enjoyable as well, and I don't easily appreciate singleplayer shooters. Varied, well paced and a good mix between freedom and linearity.
I think this is a hugely unfair statement. Have you even played Crysis? People always seem to assume it is just a pretty picture, but I found the gameplay very enjoyable as well, and I don't easily appreciate singleplayer shooters. Varied, well paced and a good mix between freedom and linearity.