HBS,Longsword are almoust unblockable in agility char hands.
Devs need to come up with a fair solution and stop cathering to pure build noobs.
That's exactly what they did by making the pure agi (after having enough PD) archer non-optimal, mind you.
I don't understand the reasoning behind buffing Longsword/HBS because they were already both phenomenal weapons.
They made all archers bad
and now pure meleers can not only run over kiters, but also dance around the rest.
EU balancers make a balance patch tailored for the EU metagame, which had almost no short 2h.
trolling...
As per usual... shielders get nothing.Polearmers as well..
"truth" not truth
As per usual... shielders get nothing.
just wait for the BIG PACH
This is funny. It seems like people do nothing but complain. No matter what gets buffed / nerfed, people always keep on crying.
That's exactly what they did by making the pure agi (after having enough PD) archer non-optimal, mind you.
The truth is that heavy lance users got hit the hardest and even if Mlecke talked about it in the OP most people fail to see it because everyone got so confused by the archer overnerf and 2h inner balancing... Community I am disappoint.Yeah, cause heavy lance cav was a really bad class that never topped the scoreboard. It could not take the loss of 3 pierce damage, no one plays it anymore since the patch.
I got a new name for the weapon: Heavy Glance :mrgreen:
I dunno much abbout ranged since i newer was an good archer,but this new longbow stats are great.How is this new?
If u use bodikins arrows that convert cut to pierce you can get 31 pierce dmg and deal dmg as steel pick do.
Yeah, cause heavy lance cav was a really bad class that never topped the scoreboard. It could not take the loss of 3 pierce damage, no one plays it anymore since the patch.Well -3 pierce damage is pretty dramatic change for a weapon that basically has one attack direction in it's normal use. Tell that to all the people who have retired or respec'd to become 1h cavalry and use the great lance as their second weapon. 1h cav deals crazy damage, and they are able to use those couching lances effectively. If I take a couching lance what do I use for secondary if I get into a situation where I have to use something else? Long hafted blade? Lol...
In my experience, a poleaxe or a great axe or a long hafted mace are wonderful secondaries.From horseback? :D
From horseback? :D
Well -3 pierce damage is pretty dramatic change for a weapon that basically has one attack direction in it's normal use. Tell that to all the people who have retired or respec'd to become 1h cavalry and use the great lance as their second weapon. 1h cav deals crazy damage, and they are able to use those couching lances effectively. If I take a couching lance what do I use for secondary if I get into a situation where I have to use something else? Long hafted blade? Lol...
Except for the onehanded cav who use the great lance (the couch lance) without any pole wpf. They can have the best of both worlds.(click to show/hide)
Still see cav doing very fine Odin. (better KD than any other class today on EU1, topping too..) Sometimes my mind is boggled by yours and Kafeins blindness to cav being totally OP. Otherwise reasonable people, perhaps blinded by their own lack of skill? Or just lobbying for their class idk..
Overall happy with the patch so far.. :)
perhaps blinded by their own lack of skill?
Still see cav doing very fine Odin. (better KD than any other class today on EU1, topping too..) Sometimes my mind is boggled by yours and Kafeins blindness to cav being totally OP. Otherwise reasonable people, perhaps blinded by their own lack of skill? Or just lobbying for their class idk..
Overall happy with the patch so far.. :)
Except for the onehanded cav who use the great lance (the couch lance) without any pole wpf. They can have the best of both worlds.
(click to show/hide)
So your reasoning is that they top the scoreboard because they have a +3 heavy lance, while yours have become fucking worthless? :lol:
I don't get it.
Yeah poor cav.. No looms you say? :)Did you read his (or my) posts at all, or is your understanding a bit weak atm? I'm bitching about how 1h cav is so much better than lance cav atm. Gurnisson played with great lance/1h cav. Meaning probably with no wpf in poles whatsoever and using great lance when he sees good opportunities to rape infantry over. 1h when you drag some poor stab lancer to a corner where he can't do anything (or simply just slash the horse's head from a convenient angle)... That's what I would do.