cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Whalen207 on April 05, 2011, 06:07:51 am

Title: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Whalen207 on April 05, 2011, 06:07:51 am
So yeah...
      Flame away.

Also, EU players saying they have more skill is a lie. We have bigger battles with less
Blocking / feinting and more hacking and slashing

This is a secret poll. Results in two weeks.
Btw; not trolling

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


EDIT: 4/5/2011

Ow, my fucking finger. My german shepard bit it. Than I tripped -
- over the dog and got my finger caught in a closed door. Whoopee.
Anyways, summary of flames sofar:

NA  Advantages:
- More English Speakers
- More populated servers
- Consistency in skill
- Small squad tactics

EU Advantages:
- Larger player base
- Some very good players
- Large-scale tactics
- No adminging
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Kalam on April 05, 2011, 06:18:47 am
The Chinese beat us all.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Earthdforce on April 05, 2011, 06:21:35 am
NA. Let the flamez begin.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Sphinxer on April 05, 2011, 06:27:48 am
Korean > The world ... sadly :(
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 05, 2011, 06:41:10 am
I think they both suck/rock.

Honestly, my highest scores have been on the EU servers and my ping is an average of 214 there.

I am not the best player out there, but there is something extremely wrong with me having a 14 kill 0 death archery record at the end of a match with 214 ping on EU, or alternatively going into NA siege on melee and being in the top five with nothing but attacks and feints (Now that I was taught how to properly use them with foot work) and no blocks.

EU can not dodge range to save their lives on average, and NA has a severe probem when it comes to blocking (If I kill you in melee 5 times in a best of 9 match, something is suspect... I am only good with the pike, if I pull out my No Dachi and still clean your clock, you should be VERY insulted)... Speaking of which... did I mention that I suck, and yet kill people one on one in NA when I use my pike? yes it can stab, but it can also feint into an overhead... If I can overhead block the painfully slow overhead attack animation on a pike, then so should you... especially if I just did it twice already on your skull moments before.

I should now mention the "Can_You_Down_Block" "CanYouBlockDown_PGI" character on NA that somehow manages to get K/D ratios of 4 or higher? And yes, she ONLY uses down attacks...

I dunno... I think both servers have an equal ratio of good and bad players, though I dare say the EU displays better large-scale clan tactics some days, but the NA pulls ahead with better squad-level tactics for clans.

Australia has the most skilled players for some reason. You go there and it seems to be 80% BKS quality on the peaks.

I just find it fascinating that the class preferences for EU and NA differ so radically. I still wonder why NA has a massive throwing spam and EU has a massive bow spam.

Also a few weird things, like EU having for the most part rubbish Tin Cans while NA has a few that are deadly (Like when BKS_Rhade goes into plate? Scary), and conversely NA has a large percentage of Cav that are infatuated with the moronic tactic of focusing on one infantry man with constant circles that get them stabbed, while EU cav seem to be more intelligent...

I dunno... Where is the "Neither" vote option?

I want a cookie.

EDIT: I do think though that the NA servers win the award for "Highest number of egotistical players," they do have more of those then EU, certainly.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Maira on April 05, 2011, 06:49:45 am
"Can_You_Down_Block"
I want a cookie.

CanYouBlockDown_PGI*
No cookies for you! >=3
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 05, 2011, 06:52:20 am
CanYouBlockDown_PGI*
No cookies for you! >=3

Blast, I will edit and correct it hahaha.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Vibe on April 05, 2011, 09:24:42 am
Bah this thread title has flame written all over it *gets out before the war begins*
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Lorn on April 05, 2011, 09:28:09 am
EU is bestest!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Kalam on April 05, 2011, 09:33:00 am
In all honesty, with equal ping, I think NA would win in a melee battle of the best due to the sheer number of high PS/IF builds. It doesn't matter if you hit 'em five times and they hit you once, dead is dead.

A large scale free for all would be probably favour EU, since they've got more tactical clans than we do, with a larger, more experienced pool to draw from. 
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Cyclopsided on April 05, 2011, 09:56:17 am
In all honesty, with equal ping, I think NA would win in a melee battle of the best due to the sheer number of high PS/IF builds. It doesn't matter if you hit 'em five times and they hit you once, dead is dead.

A large scale free for all would be probably favour EU, since they've got more tactical clans than we do, with a larger, more experienced pool to draw from.
I'm going to side with a mix of above posts, but largely with kalam.
In melee, due to the nature of the high strength duelists in NA, they simply will win small melee fights and duels. However, in large coordinated battles EU has a strong advantage due to using much more teamwork. EU Cav also isn't as stupid.

I really wish NA had more teamwork -- I've been organizing squad level teamwork like crazy amongst my close friends. The problem with NA is EVERYBODY IS CONSTANTLY CIRCLE STRAFE SIDE STEPPING AND SIDE SWINGING, TEAM-SLASHING THE SHIT OUT OF EACH OTHER. OH MY GOD. That works in duels not team battles. Stop it. I think I need to write out a giant thread about how you should be using footwork and teammates abilities in harmony. It isn't hard. I find a shielder or good 2her at the beginning of a map and say in chat "I'm on you _____, I'll be to your right, don't step to the right."

Oh, I am the guy who only stabs people on CanYouBlockDown_PGI. The thing is not that NA players are bad at manual blocking, I just use teamwork to my advantage. I guarantee I could do the same if not better in EU due to their increased level of teamwork.

Oh, And this thread was a bad idea and you should feel bad.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Keshian on April 05, 2011, 10:12:46 am
I think they both suck/rock.

Honestly, my highest scores have been on the EU servers and my ping is an average of 214 there.

I am not the best player out there, but there is something extremely wrong with me having a 14 kill 0 death archery record at the end of a match with 214 ping on EU, or alternatively going into NA siege on melee and being in the top five with nothing but attacks and feints (Now that I was taught how to properly use them with foot work) and no blocks.

EU can not dodge range to save their lives on average, and NA has a severe probem when it comes to blocking (If I kill you in melee 5 times in a best of 9 match, something is suspect... I am only good with the pike, if I pull out my No Dachi and still clean your clock, you should be VERY insulted)... Speaking of which... did I mention that I suck, and yet kill people one on one in NA when I use my pike? yes it can stab, but it can also feint into an overhead... If I can overhead block the painfully slow overhead attack animation on a pike, then so should you... especially if I just did it twice already on your skull moments before.

I should now mention the "Can_You_Down_Block" "CanYouBlockDown_PGI" character on NA that somehow manages to get K/D ratios of 4 or higher? And yes, she ONLY uses down attacks...

I dunno... I think both servers have an equal ratio of good and bad players, though I dare say the EU displays better large-scale clan tactics some days, but the NA pulls ahead with better squad-level tactics for clans.

Australia has the most skilled players for some reason. You go there and it seems to be 80% BKS quality on the peaks.

I just find it fascinating that the class preferences for EU and NA differ so radically. I still wonder why NA has a massive throwing spam and EU has a massive bow spam.

Also a few weird things, like EU having for the most part rubbish Tin Cans while NA has a few that are deadly (Like when BKS_Rhade goes into plate? Scary), and conversely NA has a large percentage of Cav that are infatuated with the moronic tactic of focusing on one infantry man with constant circles that get them stabbed, while EU cav seem to be more intelligent...

I dunno... Where is the "Neither" vote option?

I want a cookie.

EDIT: I do think though that the NA servers win the award for "Highest number of egotistical players," they do have more of those then EU, certainly.

No offense Tears, but are you infatuated with BKS??  A lot of your recent posts have been constantly praising them, I don't see them being a noticeably better clan.  Right now the clans most consistently winning on banner balance are usually Chaos, BRD/Cavalieres(FCC), ATS, and Occitan, where most of the clan members are often at the top of the charts in banner balanced fights, haven't really seen the same consistency yet with BKS, could be they are a small clan or just haven't made enough of a presence yet being so new from native, I don't know.

Anyway, on topic, there is no way to ever test this till a server is place in the middle of the atlantic.  I have played on both a lot and they both have general patterns of strengths and weaknesses that could be better or worse under different battle and siege conditions.  No way to see a real clear winner. 
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Rhade on April 05, 2011, 10:25:00 am
No offense Tears, but are you infatuated with BKS??  A lot of your recent posts have been constantly praising them, I don't see them being a noticeably better clan.  Right now the clans most consistently winning on banner balance are usually Chaos, BRD/Cavalieres(FCC), ATS, and Occitan, where most of the clan members are often at the top of the charts in banner balanced fights, haven't really seen the same consistency yet with BKS, could be they are a small clan or just haven't made enough of a presence yet being so new from native, I don't know.

Anyway, on topic, there is no way to ever test this till a server is place in the middle of the atlantic.  I have played on both a lot and they both have general patterns of strengths and weaknesses that could be better or worse under different battle and siege conditions.  No way to see a real clear winner.

Sounds jelly. None of those clans you listed are really even close to us, on an even numbered basis especially.

On topic, I think it's impossible to tell. EU and NA wouldn't really be able to play each other that well.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Cyclopsided on April 05, 2011, 10:29:51 am
Sounds jealous.

On topic, I think it's impossible to tell.
There is one way to tell that, but it won't happen.
If there were any rich people, millionaire status, willing to fly top NA, AUS, Chn, etc. players out to play in EU in a LAN event. We could then see who is the top duelist, etc. Which clan Truly is the best in 8 v 8 [or other format].

Oh and if some rich person like that exists, just put the money to hosting quality less leggy servers :(. I can't play NA servers past 60-70 players since they get so laggy, both in server lag and the ping rising tons.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Keshian on April 05, 2011, 10:38:17 am
Sounds jealous. None of those clans you listed are really even close to us, on an even numbered basis especially.

On topic, I think it's impossible to tell.

Not trying to be mean, man.  Just being honest, I really havent noticed you guys on the servers.  You are welcome to do clan battles with equal number of fighters, its been done before, quite fun, usually first team to 3 wins.  Not a bad way to get your name out there and get some recognition.  I was kind of curious about your page length write-up on goretooth, seems like you haven't been playing very long and already have massive critiques of administrators from your limited experience and are being cocky about your clan's skills, might want to show some humility, goes a long way to getting respect as a confident, competent fighter, maybe take a cue from some great but humble fighters like oberyn, manofwar and cyranule.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Gnjus on April 05, 2011, 10:41:38 am
I do think though that the NA servers win the award for "Highest number of egotistical players," they do have more of those then EU, certainly.

Not sure about who does all these "hall of fame", "who is better", "who is best archer/xbower/etc" threads most, americans or europeans ? Probably EU, right ?  :wink:
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Rhade on April 05, 2011, 10:47:13 am
Not trying to be mean, man.  Just being honest, I really havent noticed you guys on the servers.  You are welcome to do clan battles with equal number of fighters, its been done before, quite fun, usually first team to 3 wins.  Not a bad way to get your name out there and get some recognition.  I was kind of curious about your page length write-up on goretooth, seems like you haven't been playing very long and already have massive critiques of administrators from your limited experience and are being cocky about your clan's skills, might want to show some humility, goes a long way to getting respect as a confident, competent fighter, maybe take a cue from some great but humble fighters like oberyn, manofwar and cyranule.

I know Goretooth just fine, and took everything I needed to know from the fact at hand. Opinions aren't important when there are facts aplenty to be had. I am humble, but I'm also honest, and when you've never in your clan's long history lost a single scrim or match and you win 99% of the duel tournaments you enter, I think that it's safe to give your honest opinion that your clan is pretty good.

I'm really not looking to make this into a BkS thread, but you saying "hey man they aren't that good" just because you haven't seen us much doesn't say a lot when a lot of people have. I don't see why you jump on someone for giving their opinion.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Cyclopsided on April 05, 2011, 10:53:53 am
BkS are pretty decent players, I just don't think you are as special as you think here in Crpg. In native you certainly do your NA Native stuff well.
You guys are certainly skilled in duels. I haven't seen any teamwork though. You fit perfectly in with everyone else in NA :).
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Rhade on April 05, 2011, 10:55:12 am
BkS are pretty decent players, I just don't think you are as special as you think here in Crpg. In native you certainly do your NA Native stuff well.
You guys are certainly skilled in duels. I haven't seen any teamwork though. You fit perfectly in with everyone else in NA :).

We don't do RP shieldwalls or shit like that, but we get shit done just fine together, actually.

"Teamwork" isn't just getting in vent and saying "CAVALRY FLANK LEFT, FORM A SHIELD WALL." etc etc. We play very well together and our cohesion is extremely efficient.

Don't you play on EU servers, anyway?
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Cyclopsided on April 05, 2011, 11:01:29 am
We don't do RP shieldwalls or shit like that, but we get shit done just fine together, actually.

"Teamwork" isn't just getting in vent and saying "CAVALRY FLANK LEFT, FORM A SHIELD WALL." etc etc. We play very well together and our cohesion is extremely efficient.
I said nothing about forming shield walls and such. They are good in certain scenarios though. I'd actually like to play with you guys some time.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Rhade on April 05, 2011, 11:04:03 am
tbh, I like EU's admin system 100% better.

Our servers feel like the Third Reich, and there's not a damn thing we can do about it besides watch the admins abuse their power. Even if it's blatantly obvious and we post about it, nothing happens whatsoever.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Goretooth on April 05, 2011, 11:26:00 am
15v15 sounds good to me.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: gazda on April 05, 2011, 11:30:28 am
i've played on na only twice (and thats before patch 0.2) so i cant really judge
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Leiknir on April 05, 2011, 12:06:26 pm
I don't know why, but the NA community feels "younger", leading to more stupid discussions on the server and more general asshattery leading to even angrier admins. Maybe it's because even though eu guys are the same age, most eu-kiddies can't speak english yet and keep silent.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: [ptx] on April 05, 2011, 12:15:09 pm
Haha, that sure helps :D

But on-topic, EU > NA. By far.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Spawny on April 05, 2011, 12:28:14 pm
NA is better. On EU we have the Turks (Kapikulu). Some players have some skill, but I'm not going near any of them in battles or sieges. I always get teamhit/killed when I do.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Paul on April 05, 2011, 01:03:21 pm
Aussie is best.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Hirlok on April 05, 2011, 01:15:00 pm
Oh and if some rich person like that exists, just put the money to hosting quality less leggy servers :(. I can't play NA servers past 60-70 players since they get so laggy, both in server lag and the ping rising tons.

Not going into the general flaming of this thread at all, but technically the EU servers indeed SEEM to be better.
I have terrible ping on both, since I live in Paraguay (220-280 on NA siege, about 50-80 MORE on EU Siege servers), but usually experience less lag on EU servers despite of my higher ping there.

So it would be cool, if someone could analyze what the issues are, post detailed and clear specs (technically and financially) of what we would need to improve the situation, and then take action. I am not rich, but would happily donate a few bucks per month to get a faster server.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Beauchamp on April 05, 2011, 01:33:17 pm
the only difference i spotted is people raging about archers (especialy those that play it smart) way more on NA than on EU (and when i say raging, i mean really RAGING - votekick polls, constant bitching in chat, teamwounding...).
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Blondin on April 05, 2011, 01:51:50 pm
And one more who got the biggest e-peen thread...
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Hirlok on April 05, 2011, 01:52:25 pm
the only difference i spotted is people raging about archers (especialy those that play it smart) way more on NA than on EU (and when i say raging, i mean really RAGING - votekick polls, constant bitching in chat, teamwounding...).
yup, indeed. just had another incident on NA that got us both kicked  - the griefer and me, since meanwhile I am so sick of it that I turn round and kill the bastard if they keep kicking me or throw shit in my back while I try to shoot enemies...
About the bitching in chat: some of the heroes and hefty wannabe-generals are muted when I play. Only DocHorrible is allowed to bitch, since "she" usually makes sense at least and I kinda like "her" ;-) 
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Christo on April 05, 2011, 02:06:30 pm
I only play EU, don't know about NA, but I always hear that there are way more trolls than here, also, most complaints were heard from NA imo.

I voted EU.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: ManOfWar on April 05, 2011, 02:13:17 pm
There are indeed a decent amount of assholes on NA, though I stopped playing on EU when NA servers came out, so I cannot say which is better

also thanks Kesh for the compliment
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: La Makina on April 05, 2011, 03:06:43 pm
NA is better. On EU we have the Turks (Kapikulu). Some players have some skill, but I'm not going near any of them in battles or sieges. I always get teamhit/killed when I do.

LOL, so true. They seem to be eager to steal your frag. They are also the only clan who tried to poll ban me for an accidental TK of one of their member (notwithstanding my apologizes). I don't take it bad but it is the pot calling the kettle black.  :D

Back on topic: I went once soft leeching on a NA siege (i.e. fighting casual, just enough to not piss the admin off, I know it is bad). I ended up second of the scoreboard (just below the barmace munchkin guy). The US are all about guns but when it comes to melee fights...  :wink:
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 05, 2011, 04:48:52 pm
No offense Tears, but are you infatuated with BKS??  A lot of your recent posts have been constantly praising them, I don't see them being a noticeably better clan.  Right now the clans most consistently winning on banner balance are usually Chaos, BRD/Cavalieres(FCC), ATS, and Occitan, where most of the clan members are often at the top of the charts in banner balanced fights, haven't really seen the same consistency yet with BKS, could be they are a small clan or just haven't made enough of a presence yet being so new from native, I don't know.

Anyway, on topic, there is no way to ever test this till a server is place in the middle of the atlantic.  I have played on both a lot and they both have general patterns of strengths and weaknesses that could be better or worse under different battle and siege conditions.  No way to see a real clear winner.

Actually I have been mentioning them because 1 they are well known and 2 to infuriate three people who know me. Occitan is a very good clan, I agree on that, as for chaos while they are extremely skilled they are shit for large scale team work, though extremely skilled, like BKS I suppose but without the excuse that BKS is small where as Chaos is large enough they should be practicing large scale tactics instead of wandering around in micro clusters or like a Celtic horde. ATS is also a good mention yes.

Notice that every few weeks I rotate through the clans I mention, a bit ago it was BRD and before that it was members of Chaos/RS and I think I went through a phase of talking about Acre. This is due to me spectating clans for a week or two before moving on, to see what the sense of team play, skills, and composition is.

As for the NA raging more about range, I do think that they are blooming Silly for that, as the EU has significantly more range ( though less throwing) and they complain much less.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 05, 2011, 04:57:54 pm
Voted EU.

Having played on both European servers and North American servers;

I like the NA skill set better. EU, for the most part, is like mining for gems. You come across a lot of pretty awful combatants, but then you run into the occasional *very* skilled fighter. The skill difference is really wide. Either you're cannon fodder, or a flippin' hero. NA is more consistent, and has a broader average. I find that most combatants are capable, but not many reach the level of skill that the power players in EU do.

However, as much as I like the fighting in NA, I definitely prefer the EU community. It's not so strict with their servers, meaning that people can actually have fun if they want. Administrators only come into play when it gets out of hand, the way it should be. EU doesn't get kick crazy admins jumping on and booting waves of people when the server isn't even half full (because that's CLEARLY the way to seed a server; by clearing it out).

Despite the poll spam on the EU servers, I'm alright with that, because the community is friendlier and generally more accepting, as are the admins. Skill set might be more spread out between great fighters and the not-so-great guys. But they're friendly, making it definitely a better environment to play in.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Casimir on April 05, 2011, 06:35:35 pm
Dextaa voted EU cos he loves me.

I voted EU cos of Tommys Sister, sorry Dex.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: serpus on April 05, 2011, 06:56:29 pm
EU has good admins, NA does not.

NA has LLJK, EU does not.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nindur on April 05, 2011, 07:30:29 pm
I don't think hate mongering threads should be allowed, maybe I can go make a thread titled who is stronger/better/faster Germans or the French?

Really though, what a broad, open-ended question. Rephrase it to be more specific.
 

If you want to give back to the community and make a positive contribution, make a thhread title "similarities between the NA and eu servers" or "ways to improve the na or eu servers".

Thanks for the completely useless troll thread that has brought nothing positive in any way, shape or form to the community.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Keshian on April 05, 2011, 07:35:16 pm
Actually I have been mentioning them because 1 they are well known and 2 to infuriate three people who know me. Occitan is a very good clan, I agree on that, as for chaos while they are extremely skilled they are shit for large scale team work, though extremely skilled, like BKS I suppose but without the excuse that BKS is small where as Chaos is large enough they should be practicing large scale tactics instead of wandering around in micro clusters or like a Celtic horde. ATS is also a good mention yes.

Notice that every few weeks I rotate through the clans I mention, a bit ago it was BRD and before that it was members of Chaos/RS and I think I went through a phase of talking about Acre. This is due to me spectating clans for a week or two before moving on, to see what the sense of team play, skills, and composition is.

As for the NA raging more about range, I do think that they are blooming Silly for that, as the EU has significantly more range ( though less throwing) and they complain much less.

+1 kudos, that actaully sounds like a great way to improve fighting skill but also learn tactics that work and don't work.  Really like the idea of watching good fighters and improving your own style of play from observation, hadn't really done the team tactic observation a try yet though, probably will now.  It would be cool if you got the chance to sit in on teamchat while you did so and see some of the background coordiantion.  By the way what do you thinka re the strengths and weaknesses of the Fallen?, I know they are a little more EU based, but I always like watching Fallen_Loki coordinating really well with Fallen_Manhammer on siege.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nogar on April 05, 2011, 07:41:30 pm
BR
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Murmillus_Prime on April 05, 2011, 07:55:17 pm
Admins are far better on Eu servers, the little time I've played on NA servers before being perm banned for arguing with a hypocritical admin proved to me that most of my deaths were from throwing weapons and archers and I died from melee less on NA server than EU ones. I noticed far higher numbers of archers on NA servers than EU servers also. I rarely bumped into any skilled players on NA servers, on EU servers many skilled players use light armour and suprise you, because they look like peasants, on NA server people who look like peasants generally are peasants and the good players tend to wear heavier armour most of the time, especially ones who become infamous/well known by the servers community for having a high score.

Alot more shit talking goes on the NA servers but if it doesn't meet admin approval expect a perm ban.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nindur on April 05, 2011, 09:47:58 pm
Admins are far better on Eu servers, the little time I've played on NA servers before being perm banned for arguing with a hypocritical admin proved to me that most of my deaths were from throwing weapons and archers and I died from melee less on NA server than EU ones. I noticed far higher numbers of archers on NA servers than EU servers also. I rarely bumped into any skilled players on NA servers, on EU servers many skilled players use light armour and suprise you, because they look like peasants, on NA server people who look like peasants generally are peasants and the good players tend to wear heavier armour most of the time, especially ones who become infamous/well known by the servers community for having a high score.

Alot more shit talking goes on the NA servers but if it doesn't meet admin aproval expect a perm ban.

I agree with everything this guy says ^^^^^^^
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nindur on April 05, 2011, 09:57:50 pm
Also, I just played on EU 2, and apparently its retarded tuesday, which is what the players told me, not something I invented. Everyone wears plate and rides horses, SOMEONE GOT SOME SPLAININ TO DO!!!! Wheres da skill in dat!?!??!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Zisa on April 05, 2011, 09:58:49 pm
eu:
more maps that natuarally lead to static defense,
some older versions of maps (i.e. village) with what I think are inferior spawns
trash talk seems more good natured, if present, as most seem to intent on killing other team to have time to troll.
more HA, more squirrels, almost always ladders and seige shields

na:
more tension
some nicer maps
people I know
better ping less packet loss

Not seeing a change in the amount of stupid team wounding in battle, still get slashed, which happens, or as common, hero archer/thrower/ cav bumped in either place.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 05, 2011, 09:58:59 pm
Also, I just played on EU 2, and apparently its retarded tuesday, which is what the players told me, not something I invented. Everyone wears plate and rides horses, SOMEONE GOT SOME SPLAININ TO DO!!!! Wheres da skill in dat!?!??!

Coming from the guy who uses Milanese plate, a man cleaver, a winged helm and rides on a Cataphract?!

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Magikarp on April 05, 2011, 10:02:14 pm
EU as a whole has got more players, so theoretically speaking EU has more skill, which is my personal opinion too.

And Nindur: You don't even know how to ride a friggin horse probably, trollololol.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on April 05, 2011, 10:03:27 pm
He hasn't been doing that build in quite a while. Of course for quite a while he was a thrower in heavy armor... But either way, Ninderp has le skills. He just chooses not to use them sometimes. This is why he is Ninderp.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nindur on April 05, 2011, 10:21:42 pm
derp.








My mama always told me a gold trollin thins the blood! Today is troll day in my workout, tommorow is nice day/triceps :D:D:


Chilllllll Im just effein with you guyz
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 05, 2011, 10:59:20 pm
+1 kudos, that actaully sounds like a great way to improve fighting skill but also learn tactics that work and don't work.  Really like the idea of watching good fighters and improving your own style of play from observation, hadn't really done the team tactic observation a try yet though, probably will now.  It would be cool if you got the chance to sit in on teamchat while you did so and see some of the background coordiantion.  By the way what do you thinka re the strengths and weaknesses of the Fallen?, I know they are a little more EU based, but I always like watching Fallen_Loki coordinating really well with Fallen_Manhammer on siege.

I have had the chance to sit in other teamchats for three other clans, not counting my own. It would be nice if I could manage to somehow sit in other team chats as well, but I doubt it as other clans are generally uncooperative in allowing "outsiders" to sit in for a bit, especially since I am a "Fallen bundle of sticks" as numerous clans enjoy calling me, bless their souls for that bit of endearment. I would love to sit in with more.

I think a great deal many things of the strengths and weaknesses of the Fallen, and certainly agree that we are EU based primarily, though of course we do have a concrete version on the NA side for a Fallen Archer Death Squad (Of course, it is smaller then the EU version and comes into play at different times).

It may sound geeky but I do enjoy creating mental playbooks so to speak of the various other clans, as it certainly helps keep me alive longer at least in Battle (Though I noticed that some clans have completely different mentalities on Seige). It also helped me start to predict the date rape team when I observed them for a bit and noticed the places they rarely rode into... Pity they stopped played cav, it was an amazing challenge to keep alive with them playing at the same time.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on April 05, 2011, 11:46:39 pm
I'm gonna second the BR nomination.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Opium.dk on April 06, 2011, 06:25:47 am
Playing on NA feels like all of them are Kapikulus, retarded spam and team damage all over the place.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nindur on April 06, 2011, 12:53:26 pm
Give me screenshots so I can ban them all!!! I told everyone on NA that they must play like pros until this poll is over, if they are disobeying me I will show them the error of their ways
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 06, 2011, 04:14:51 pm
Give me screenshots so I can ban them all!!! I told everyone on NA that they must play like pros until this poll is over, if they are disobeying me I will show them the error of their ways

It'll fill your ban quota for the next 3 years
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on April 06, 2011, 04:18:12 pm
If this were a poll to nominate the worst, I'd nominate Siege despite it not being on the list. Siege seems to be No Block Only Hit, the Gamemode. I feel like a cheater when I manually block in siege, because almost no one seems to, EU or NA.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 06, 2011, 04:27:51 pm
If this were a poll to nominate the worst, I'd nominate Siege despite it not being on the list. Siege seems to be No Block Only Hit, the Gamemode. I feel like a cheater when I manually block in siege, because almost no one seems to, EU or NA.

Not true! Occitan, Chaos, ATS and the capable randoms fight on the siege too! It's a lot of fun playing with capable fighters on siege.

It's like Dynasty Warriors : Warband. You plow through the serfs and peasants, then walk up to the boss(es) and duke it out with them!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Leesin on April 06, 2011, 06:37:03 pm
Coming from England I play EU servers mainly, if I am up late sometimes I play on NA servers and generally have a good experience on those barring alot of chat rage sometimes. NA siege though, I don't know what happened to it as it used to be fine, but I played on it again last night and half of the players just spammed side swings at enemies who were on the OTHER SIDE of a team mate.

I lost count of how many times I was slashed in the back when I was simply standing on the spot or moving within a 1 metre square, also see many team mates run into a group of other team mates who were killing an enemy, spamming sideswings and wounding them all and not even touching the enemy.

Overall I'd of course have to go with EU, I seem to come across less side swing spamming team wounding players and more players who actually play for the team, rather than themself. I also feel the level of skill is higher on EU in general, I come across far more hard fights on EU servers than I do on NA, but that is most likely down to the fact there are just more EU players thus there is generally alot more highly skilled players. I also saw more chat rage on the NA Battle server last night than I have seen on the EU servers in a whole week, probably two.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Patricia on April 06, 2011, 07:06:41 pm
Who's better? Me, obviously.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nindur on April 06, 2011, 07:44:03 pm
Coming from the guy who uses Milanese plate, a man cleaver, a winged helm and rides on a Cataphract?!

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!

I resent this statement!! My horse is only loomed once, and I don't use Milanese I only use double loomed churburg! Also I use the sallet not the winged great helm, and my military cleaver is only loomed 3 times!!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Zisa on April 06, 2011, 08:04:38 pm
Coming from England I play EU servers mainly, if I am up late sometimes I play on NA servers and generally have a good experience on those barring alot of chat rage sometimes. NA siege though, I don't know what happened to it as it used to be fine, but I played on it again last night and half of the players just spammed side swings at enemies who were on the OTHER SIDE of a team mate.

I lost count of how many times I was slashed in the back when I was simply standing on the spot or moving within a 1 metre square, also see many team mates run into a group of other team mates who were killing an enemy, spamming sideswings and wounding them all and not even touching the enemy.

Overall I'd of course have to go with EU, I seem to come across less side swing spamming team wounding players and more players who actually play for the team, rather than themself. I also feel the level of skill is higher on EU in general, I come across far more hard fights on EU servers than I do on NA, but that is most likely down to the fact there are just more EU players thus there is generally alot more highly skilled players. I also saw more chat rage on the NA Battle server last night than I have seen on the EU servers in a whole week, probably two.
Have to disagree, there is no shortage of ff from melee, retardo cav, missiles in eu.

On the plus side, it seems larger maps makes it easier to find someone willing to melee.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: ManOfWar on April 06, 2011, 08:30:58 pm
There is less rage on EU because the majority do not speak or write english
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: RandomDude on April 06, 2011, 10:10:27 pm
Its kinda impossible to say NA or EU.

I've had great scoring rounds on both servers and equally bad rounds on both.

I dont know how tactics has progressed in the last 2 months but NA wasnt that bad compared to EU. I saw tactics all the time on NA servers.

Both regions have some great players too.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Babelfish on April 06, 2011, 11:24:00 pm
There is less rage on EU because the majority do not speak or write english

Tbh not the main reason why we have less rage.

On the official servers, chadz and his crew are kings. Even if some douche-bag (Generalizing, not speaking of goore;p) does ban you, thats not the end of the world. For if the ban was unjust, chadz or another from his crew will right the injustice.
 Also if you look at our unban thread and/or closed cases you will notice much more approachable admins.
Since we got admins from various clans, they somehow provide a overseer system, as they can check up on other admins ban, and they are not afraid to tell the admin abooser that he should cool down.

We live with the knowledge that 99% of our bans are right/deserved, we have no real reason to rage. From what ive heard, it was completely different story on NA (ive heard Ecko stepped in and fixed some of the issues).

Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Leesin on April 06, 2011, 11:56:55 pm
Have to disagree, there is no shortage of ff from melee, retardo cav, missiles in eu.

On the plus side, it seems larger maps makes it easier to find someone willing to melee.

Perhaps that might be your experience, but playing on NA siege last night was my worst time playing cRPG in months when it comes down to careless team mates, enough to make me not want to ever join NA siege again.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on April 07, 2011, 12:01:57 am
Leesin, never play NA siege. EU siege has more pollspam and crap, but NA siege turns into melee clusterfuck TK fests.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: ManOfWar on April 07, 2011, 12:02:24 am
All our judgements are flawed because on both servers we play with different people every time we play, so sometime we might get good players who dont FF and other times it will be hell
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Rhade on April 07, 2011, 12:49:34 am
Respect to EU.

We'll never know if we're better, so all we can do is assume it's impossible to know for sure and leave ourselves open to the fact that we may be better, we may be worse.

Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Casimir on April 07, 2011, 01:10:31 am
We should get a server in the middle of the North Atlantic and play there together!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nemeth on April 07, 2011, 01:12:28 am
We should get a server in the middle of the North Atlantic and play there together!

DO IT!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Maira on April 07, 2011, 01:22:39 am
We should get a server in the middle of the North Atlantic and play there together!

What about people that live in Atlantis? They'd have the best pings..! =S
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Formless on April 07, 2011, 07:06:23 am
EU is bestest!

Lorn Hi, I thought you were dead.  :shock:
 
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Whalen207 on April 08, 2011, 04:00:01 am
Week or so left!  :D
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Havoco on April 08, 2011, 04:04:22 am
To OP, ping>all

Greenland server?
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Zisa on April 08, 2011, 04:40:26 am
Perhaps that might be your experience, but playing on NA siege last night was my worst time playing cRPG in months when it comes down to careless team mates, enough to make me not want to ever join NA siege again.
I rarely play siege, I was refering to battle.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Spurdospera on April 10, 2011, 10:32:14 pm
If you guys would have played today on 80-man NA server you would know which is better...
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Stokes on April 10, 2011, 11:03:31 pm
There is only one way to solve this: WE MUST HOST A SERVER AT THE BOTTOM OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND HAVE EPIC CROSS-CONTINENTAL DUELS!

Seriously though this topic is funny... it's basically a poll of how many people from EU/NA post on the forums. lulz.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 11, 2011, 12:05:07 am
So Fallen hit the NA servers today. Lots of fun. Many props for being able to compete on the NA servers despite the ping disadvantage, guys.

Lots of fun, and really gave us a kick in the butt to get our rears in gear for Strategus!!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: RamsesXXIIX on April 11, 2011, 12:16:39 am
So Fallen hit the NA servers today. Lots of fun. Many props for being able to compete on the NA servers despite the ping disadvantage, guys.

Lots of fun, and really gave us a kick in the butt to get our rears in gear for Strategus!!

Glad you liked it ;)

It was quite fun to see how NA guys just started taking our banner and joined our ranks. Eventually, you kicked us out though ;) Good fights.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Razzen on April 11, 2011, 12:25:54 am
I will have to choose RU, EU or NA, are you mad?
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Beauchamp on April 11, 2011, 12:47:34 am
on 80 men server we quite rolled over everyone, on 100 man it was not so good (but lets not speak about that one :)).
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Adrian on April 11, 2011, 01:35:19 am
I wasn't really feeling rolled at anytime. Fallen was just spamming range from rooftops, most of them aren't even close to being a decent archer. But you proved Quantity over Quality can prevail I guess.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 11, 2011, 02:16:19 am
I wasn't really feeling rolled at anytime. Fallen was just spamming range from rooftops, most of them aren't even close to being a decent archer. But you proved tactics over individual skill can prevail I guess.

Fix'd
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Diomedes on April 11, 2011, 04:43:22 am
Is there anybody consistently better than harmless peasant on EU?  I find him quite tough to beat in 1v1, tougher than almost any other player in any gear [that I've fought] (Socrates consistently sends me for a whirl though, props there too I guess).
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Boss_Awesome on April 11, 2011, 04:50:42 am
I wasn't really feeling rolled at anytime. Fallen was just spamming range from rooftops, most of them aren't even close to being a decent archer. But you proved Quantity over Quality can prevail I guess.

I would have to disagree.  I had a 5x for quite a long time.  Just because our kill to deaths weren't always great doesn't mean we are bad archers.  Often we wound enemies so melee can easily finish them, stun enemies so melee get through their guard, or shoot team mates to anger them and make them fight harder.  Archers are a support class and are a million times more effective when coordinated. 
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Rhade on April 11, 2011, 08:25:16 am
Fix'd

drool

CAMPING = TACTICS

/drool
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Kalam on April 11, 2011, 08:27:41 am
Is there anybody consistently better than harmless peasant on EU?  I find him quite tough to beat in 1v1, tougher than almost any other player in any gear [that I've fought] (Socrates consistently sends me for a whirl though, props there too I guess).

Chimp.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: owens on April 11, 2011, 09:04:26 am
This Forum topic is redundant. Australia is the best in the world. no joke any of our players could take on ten or 15 NA players easy. EU isnt much better.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Leesin on April 11, 2011, 10:38:15 am
I wasn't really feeling rolled at anytime. Fallen was just spamming range from rooftops, most of them aren't even close to being a decent archer. But you proved Quantity over Quality can prevail I guess.

Rolled enough to be mad on the forum.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Kophka on April 11, 2011, 02:39:57 pm
I loved the way the Fallen stuck together when they came to NA, the way the melee would protect the archers when their team was on the ground and moving. That showed sound thinking and a good grasp of tactics. However, it's very true that camping a roof/tower/wall doesn't really = tactics, it ='s exploiting game mechanics. I was really disappointed when the Fallen all fled back to EU after it was announced that we'd be moving to a random plains map. Imo, random plains are the best place to show your skills tactically, when there's no place to camp and hide. Those are the maps where a good leader can shine, and a clan can really show their stuff. Losing on an open plains map isn't about not having the worst duellers, it's about not being able to respond to the enemies movements because you can't work as a team. If you guys ever invade NA again, I hope you'll stick around for non-roof maps, I've always had a lot of respect for Beauchamp as a tactician.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Aljo on April 11, 2011, 03:30:12 pm
hi all !

i accidentally stumbled upon this thread, read all 6 pages in 10 min :D
since i've been banned on eu servers, i have been playing ALOT on us servers in the last 5 days and i must say i was quite suprised by the situation over there.
altough i had really bad ping (130-190), i had way better  scores then on eu. way more people suck in melee, altough there are some fine players playing in NA.
admins seemed quite nice, there was some kicking/banning going on but only for just causes like team bleeding or ta/tk.
with all of u guys mentioning chocolate chip cookie regime in na servers, i would rather say that for eu.
there are some nab admins here who think they touched god's balls when they got that title.
admins on na also always asked what happened and acted accordingly. on eu, u get banned or kicked (losing multipliers) without explanation or even word.

and also, people in us are obviously more tolerant to nicknames people have.
i've seen people named Rape, ___RAPIST, ... and people didnt judge them.
here, in eu, my nickname is seen as offensive and i get reminded of that so often with warnings or ban requests, that it looks ridiculous.
so, i must assume people really are on the slow side on eu servers since the rape train is an expression for a bunch of people rushing through enemy lines, killing everything.
its not like i wear a shirt with that nick in public, there i would expect reactions like that.
so, if i had to chose, it would be NA (voted), but i have to play on eu cuz of ping.

Damn !


Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 11, 2011, 03:39:36 pm
I hope you'll stick around for non-roof maps.

We have done those, but that is best for EU (In my opinion) where the majority have the ping to properly run all of our tactics. Come on over to the other side of the pond and see for yourself.  :D
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: RamsesXXIIX on April 11, 2011, 04:05:30 pm
I loved the way the Fallen stuck together when they came to NA, the way the melee would protect the archers when their team was on the ground and moving. That showed sound thinking and a good grasp of tactics. However, it's very true that camping a roof/tower/wall doesn't really = tactics, it ='s exploiting game mechanics. I was really disappointed when the Fallen all fled back to EU after it was announced that we'd be moving to a random plains map. Imo, random plains are the best place to show your skills tactically, when there's no place to camp and hide. Those are the maps where a good leader can shine, and a clan can really show their stuff. Losing on an open plains map isn't about not having the worst duellers, it's about not being able to respond to the enemies movements because you can't work as a team. If you guys ever invade NA again, I hope you'll stick around for non-roof maps, I've always had a lot of respect for Beauchamp as a tactician.

Oh, i didn't even notice it got announced we were going to random plains :P

In all honesty, i think the reason why we left was because we wanted to visit another NA server as well, and it was getting late for EU, so people was dropping out. Another time i would gladly be on a random plains map, i'm not afraid of our performance there. Even with the ping, and even when ATS goes all black armor :)
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 11, 2011, 04:30:27 pm
Even with the ping, and even when ATS goes all black armor :)

It's okay. We still took them down ^_^

"What?? You have black armor!? We have Chaos fighters and Fallen hailstorm!!"

Mind you I did more hiding, cowering and trash talking than actual fighting.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Phazey on April 11, 2011, 04:32:12 pm
All i can say is: come to EU1 between 10 pm and 2 am CET (thats GMT +1) and let's do some tactics. Make up your own mind... :)
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Dexxtaa on April 11, 2011, 04:49:44 pm
All i can say is: come to EU1 between 10 pm and 2 am CET (thats GMT +1) and let's do some tactics.

mmm I'll tactics with you all night, Phaz.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Cyclopsided on April 11, 2011, 06:12:30 pm
as I said; EU has superior tactics and teamwork.
And NA has some stupidly good duelers, who you probably didn't encounter. Instead, you see the random pubs running around with heads cut off.
and then Australia kills everyone?
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Patricia on April 11, 2011, 06:59:08 pm
Lol, Australia.

Good one.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Whalen207 on April 12, 2011, 12:19:48 am
Uhm so yeah NA won
 :wink:
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Leesin on April 12, 2011, 01:49:19 am
Poll was rigged, the bottom option was EU before.  :lol:
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Nemeth on April 12, 2011, 01:53:24 am
hi all !

i accidentally stumbled upon this thread, read all 6 pages in 10 min :D
since i've been banned on eu servers, i have been playing ALOT on us servers in the last 5 days and i must say i was quite suprised by the situation over there.
altough i had really bad ping (130-190), i had way better  scores then on eu. way more people suck in melee, altough there are some fine players playing in NA.
admins seemed quite nice, there was some kicking/banning going on but only for just causes like team bleeding or ta/tk.
with all of u guys mentioning chocolate chip cookie regime in na servers, i would rather say that for eu.
there are some nab admins here who think they touched god's balls when they got that title.
admins on na also always asked what happened and acted accordingly. on eu, u get banned or kicked (losing multipliers) without explanation or even word.

and also, people in us are obviously more tolerant to nicknames people have.
i've seen people named Rape, ___RAPIST, ... and people didnt judge them.
here, in eu, my nickname is seen as offensive and i get reminded of that so often with warnings or ban requests, that it looks ridiculous.
so, i must assume people really are on the slow side on eu servers since the rape train is an expression for a bunch of people rushing through enemy lines, killing everything.
its not like i wear a shirt with that nick in public, there i would expect reactions like that.
so, if i had to chose, it would be NA (voted), but i have to play on eu cuz of ping.

Damn !


So basically you're saying NA is better because you get way better scores there than on EU? Yeah, makes sense...
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: owens on April 12, 2011, 01:58:29 am
The Australian server will be up soon sit in and witness Bernard_The_Above average fight Roman. than weep at your inability to play this game.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Patricia on April 12, 2011, 04:03:30 am
This Forum topic is redundant. Australia is the best in the world. no joke any of our players could take on ten or 15 NA players easy. EU isnt much better.

Back when an AUS server actually existed, I got perma banned for rolling everyone and because I was "american" (I'm not) on the server with my 250 ping.

Australia is indeed the best in the whole whole world!
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: owens on April 12, 2011, 04:41:21 am
youre a troll. you couldn't roll a doobie
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: BD_Guard_Bane on April 12, 2011, 08:56:30 am
The Australian server will be up soon sit in and witness Bernard_The_Above average fight Roman. than weep at your inability to play this game.

Sounds like fun! Is there going to be a regular event? Man, I remember those two, they're like the best players ever. Was wondering whether they still played actually. Was thinking to myself, 'wonder what happened to the best two players of this game ever, I miss crying while watching them fight'.



Anyway, how come NA have better drama threads nowdays?
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Kalam on April 12, 2011, 09:00:55 am
There were a few aussies that I learned the basics of cRPG duelling from, back when you guys had a duel server. I'm sorry I can't recall their names, but I think one of them was Dimos or something.

Anyway, how come NA have better drama threads nowdays?

Because in a battle of egotistical bastards, we would win by a large margin.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on April 13, 2011, 07:56:39 am
Because in a battle of egotistical bastards, we would win by a large margin.

This, basically.

Regardless of "Better" skill or tactics or whatever, I have found two things that are blatantly obvious:
1.) EU has the most rage-poll spamming bastards.
2.) NA has the most rage-chat egotistical bastards.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: Kaelaen on April 13, 2011, 09:29:30 am
Whenever I play on EU (Granted, usually EU1) it takes me back to the two days I played before The Patch hit.  One team huddled together for survival, the other team doing all the attacking.  Didn't even experience rooftop bundle of sticksry either, no one breaks the ladders which I found totally cool although the sheer swarm of archers on top of said roofs were a bit daunting for a 200 ping 3 strength 31 agility peasant with a torch and a knife.  It's very difficult to say what's better, but I do like DenBitre_Cooties because he plays very well in EU and NA servers.

Feels like more people goof off in NA but since I don't really know the EU scene I feel like I'm not at liberty to judge them at their clowning abilities.
Title: Re: NA or EU? Who's better?
Post by: owens on April 13, 2011, 12:25:55 pm
You chumps are out of your depth. The powers of Dimos and Sudan combined could not be defeated by you mere mortals your servers are not only not to small but nor could they withstand the ability and skill. Sudan can manual block a sniper Xbow & Owens can take 5 throwing lances to the chest in a wedding dress. Pk 4 life