cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Weewum on May 10, 2012, 09:44:55 pm

Title: Build Choice
Post by: Weewum on May 10, 2012, 09:44:55 pm
Recently, I have been having trouble choosing a build, I narrowed it down to Melee cav (Sword, shield and lance/spear) and Crossbow cav(Light Crossbow 2 steel bolts and sword).

Please respond with what is better and not which takes more skill.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Tears of Destiny on May 10, 2012, 09:47:16 pm
Please respond with what is better and not which takes more skill.

Main issue with this is that which is better depends on personal playing style. Most people do have more fun with Melee Cav though, but personal preference will vary. Melee Cav will be more ninja or striking suddenly against targets before moving on and is a good skirmish play, where as Crossbow Cav will depend on more of a harassment mentality.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: _Tak_ on May 10, 2012, 09:48:24 pm
Don't go for heavy cav, they are useless and your horse die in 1-2 hit and you pay 4000 upkeep. Go for destrier, best horse for 1 handed cav
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Weewum on May 10, 2012, 09:49:32 pm
Main issue with this is that which is better depends on personal playing style. Most people do have more fun with Melee Cav though, but personal preference will vary. Melee Cav will be more ninja or striking suddenly against targets before moving on and is a good skirmish play, where as Crossbow Cav will depend on more of a harassment mentality.
Main reason I said that was so people wouldn't go "Crossbow cav is noobish!!1111!!!!!!1 it take nu skeel!11!!11!!!!!!"
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Tears of Destiny on May 10, 2012, 09:50:32 pm
Main reason I said that was so people wouldn't go "Crossbow cav is noobish!!1111!!!!!!1 it take nu skeel!11!!11!!!!!!"

My point still stands though, neither is really better, they just fit different roles.

I personally find a melee cav to be more of a romantic idea then crossbow, so I would go melee.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Rainbow on May 10, 2012, 09:50:52 pm
If you are EU go crossbow.  If you are NA go melee cav.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Weewum on May 10, 2012, 10:32:30 pm
Are there any good hybrid builds for the two? If so can you post it?
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: LordBerenger on May 10, 2012, 10:40:02 pm
Don't go for heavy cav, they are useless and your horse die in 1-2 hit and you pay 4000 upkeep. Go for destrier, best horse for 1 handed cav

Cuz someone thought it would be fun gameplay wise to add no leg armor to heavy horsies.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Byrdi on May 10, 2012, 10:51:06 pm
Cuz someone thought it would be fun gameplay wise to add no leg armor to heavy horsies.

It is fun.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Smoothrich on May 11, 2012, 01:31:11 am
do 18/18 or 21/15, 4 shield skill, max ATH, PS, Riding, use 3 WM, 110 1hand wpf 80-90 polearm wpf, rest (3-5) in IF

there, you have a great lancer/1hand cav build that is just as strong of a sword and boarder/hoplite/whatever polearm you want build in melee.  Melee cav and melee infantry is more fun, imo, then ranged classes.

Xbow cav is kind of hilarious, but unless you are already a skilled horseman and have good decision making you will be relegated to shooting a few horses here and there until you get wrecked by lancer cav or enemy ranged.  I think being a better horseman (you get good awareness fast from melee cav) would make you enjoy ranged cav more on your next generation.  Your score as melee cav is almost guaranteed to be much better as well, and the speed bonus makes even non loomed melee weapons hit very hard on horseback.  Non loomed bows and bolts are fairly weak when mounted.

If you want to hybrid 1hand and xbow cav together, you will need to sacrifice bringing a shield to bring more ammo and be lighter on iron flesh and stuff.  You could still just do 18/18, max Riding, Athletics, HA (you get 3 at 18 agi), WM, and Powerstrike.  This gives you 2 left over, either for shield or IF.  You could have 130 xbow wpf and 105 1hand wpf with this build easily.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Lech on May 11, 2012, 11:49:23 am
Cuz someone thought it would be fun gameplay wise to add no leg armor to heavy horsies.

It's not like those models HAVE leg armor.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Tomas_of_Miles on May 11, 2012, 12:01:54 pm
Begin as melee cav to get the hang of cav maneuvering, then if you feel like it try the xbow cav, you need a bit more awareness if you are gonna be twisting in different directions or stopping for shots. If you want to get lots of kills I'd advise melee cav, lances are very deadly, compared to the best you can reload on horseback being a masterwork light crossbow (which does the same damage as an unloomed crossbow) plus masterwork steel bolts. That crossbow setup will be nice, but obviously has nowhere near the power of an arbalest.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: FRANK_THE_TANK on May 11, 2012, 12:07:52 pm
I choose you!!! squirtle!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *throws poke ball*
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: LordBerenger on May 11, 2012, 12:39:41 pm
It's not like those models HAVE leg armor.

Should technically still be able to add leg armor even though they're not ''visible'' per say.

I mean you pay 65k for a PCharger which can be killed with 3-4 pitchfork stabs with my 1 PS 3/39 STF char.

I mean...that's BS. Reason i respec'd from heavy cav.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Slamz on May 11, 2012, 07:14:34 pm
Melee cav is a lot harder to play but also potentially a lot more rewarding.  That is, when you start out you're more likely to go 0-5 (horse keeps getting killed / you keep mistiming your swings) but in the long run you can end up going 20-0 with quality kills the whole way.

As crossbow cav you'll have a much easier time starting out but the potential for excellence is never going to be as high as melee cav.  You can snipe peasants, run down foot crossbows and foot archers and harass armored infantry but your "time to kill" one player can tend to be quite large because you generally can't risk making close passes -- a dehorsed melee cav turns into heavy infantry but a dehorsed horse crossbow is just a peasant with a crossbow, so you don't want to risk it.

Consequently, melee cav is generally a bigger asset to the team because they will risk making close passes to knock down / slash enemy infantry while the horse crossbow can't/won't.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Weewum on May 11, 2012, 09:23:04 pm
*Snip*
Heavy lances able to be used for an attack other than couching? I tried out a jousting lance and could only couch with it.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Tears of Destiny on May 11, 2012, 09:24:20 pm
Heavy lances able to be used for an attack other than couching? I tried out a jousting lance and could only couch with it.

Heavy Lances can be thrust as normal, it is the Great Lance you might be thinking of that is couch only.
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on May 11, 2012, 09:32:11 pm
If you are EU go crossbow.  If you are NA go melee cav.

Lol why? Go melee cav either way, you will bore youself to death with HX
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on May 12, 2012, 12:26:36 am
Heavy lances able to be used for an attack other than couching? I tried out a jousting lance and could only couch with it.

The jousting lance and heavy lance can only be used to couch. All others can thrust, even on foot.

Kinda want to make a STF practice lance 33 Strength footman. It's like a longer quarterstaff!!
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Torben on May 12, 2012, 12:33:04 am
The jousting lance and heavy lance can only be used to couch. All others can thrust, even on foot.

Kinda want to make a STF practice lance 33 Strength footman. It's like a longer quarterstaff!!

heavy lance is thrustable dude
Title: Re: Build Choice
Post by: Weewum on May 12, 2012, 02:43:03 pm
Just a last question, is the Heavy Lance worth it if it isn't sheathable? I've been trying to decide between it and the Double Sided Lance for that reason.