cRPG

cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Game Balance Discussion => Topic started by: Loki on February 09, 2011, 09:01:43 am

Title: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 09, 2011, 09:01:43 am
I'm curious what the community thinks of archery in it's current state.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: YourLord on February 09, 2011, 09:06:02 am
I never played an archer and I never will, but its very sad how little arrows I see flying in the sky. The battles just look poor nowadays without the archer masses, its just one blob of infantry against the other.... no more shield wall camping with archers behind makes me sad :-\ this mod used to be so epic, no more 200 pop servers no more archers I am a sad panda.....
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 09, 2011, 09:07:23 am
For the record:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


After I shot this player in the face, I was flabbergasted to see her run around with an arrow sticking out of her face.  This is with a twice heirloomed strong bow with PD 6, 152 wpf, and a bodkin arrow at medium range.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: bruce on February 09, 2011, 09:11:02 am
I never played an archer and I never will, but its very sad how little arrows I see flying in the sky. The battles just look poor nowadays without the archer masses, its just one blob of infantry against the other.... no more shield wall camping with archers behind makes me sad :-\ this mod used to be so epic, no more 200 pop servers no more archers I am a sad panda.....

You must be talking about NA servers (which have those silly town maps 90% of the time anyway), because there are still plenty of archers on EU.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Poetrydog on February 09, 2011, 09:58:05 am
For the record:
(click to show/hide)

After I shot this player in the face, I was flabbergasted to see her run around with an arrow sticking out of her face.  This is with a twice heirloomed strong bow with PD 6, 152 wpf, and a bodkin arrow at medium range.
From what I've been told a arrow in the head only shows if it's killing. If not you can't see it. So maybe you've just head the neck or something?
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Barracuda on February 09, 2011, 10:18:03 am
I think archery is a little underbalanced. Damage is a bit low and accuracy isn't that good even with ~170 wpf and a khergit bow. Some say PD increases accuracy but I'm yet to try it. Shoot speed drop has also made it pretty hard to hit a decent horseman or especially a horse archer. One could always shoot the horse but that takes many arrows (if courier or better) and you usually have other targets as well.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Fasader on February 09, 2011, 10:20:01 am
poetry dog is right. That's not a headshot, it hit the shoulder or something
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mattressi on February 09, 2011, 10:45:19 am
If that really was a hit on that unarmoured head, then wouldn't it have done the exact same damage pre-patch (all that piercing does is bypasses armour more effectively)?
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Beauchamp on February 09, 2011, 10:53:52 am
for crpg archery is ok, for strategus its a mystery.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RamsesXXIIX on February 09, 2011, 11:08:30 am
for crpg archery is ok, for strategus its a mystery.

Agree on this.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Vexus on February 09, 2011, 11:34:48 am
Starting as an archer it may be slow and painful for the low damage you do but going higher in PD they become very strong.

Some eu players probably know the witch archer she/he can take half or more of your life with 1 arrow and headshots frequently (There's many more archers that deal good damage so it's not only 1 person).

Maybe buff lower bows but surely archery is not under powered it's just throwing is more easier to use and hopefully something will be done on it next patch.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Everkistus on February 09, 2011, 11:52:04 am
for crpg archery is ok, for strategus its a mystery.
Agree on this.
I agree with these two.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Camaris on February 09, 2011, 12:08:24 pm
Im playing this generation as archer.
I think archers are really balanced. You can be very good to very bad depending on how you do this day.

Its not to easy and not to hard.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Wulzzz on February 09, 2011, 12:16:29 pm
I guess mainly the guys who are too stupid to buy a wodden shield still think archers are OP..

Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Punisher on February 09, 2011, 12:27:55 pm
Archery is balanced in cRPG now, there are a lot of sucky archers that used to spam and now cry because they got nerfed but there are also skilled archers who top the scoreboards. In Strategus unless bow crafting will be very expensive archery will still be OP.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: kura on February 09, 2011, 02:20:51 pm
Before and after patch archers ok.
For example crossbows limited parameters, and archers just skills - higher skill higher parameters.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Tai Feng on February 09, 2011, 03:07:47 pm
I guess mainly the guys who are too stupid to buy a wodden shield still think archers are OP..

People who think wooden shield protects you from archers are stupid.
You're better off running in a zig-zag than using most (non-heirloomed) shields with current shield balance.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: bruce on February 09, 2011, 03:10:58 pm
Heirlooming afaik doesn't increase coverage. It might look that way because the new values aren't updated properly to the heirloom menu, so for instance when you try to heirloom a heavy crossbow it says it'll do 87p or something, while actually it gets the correct 5% damage (or 67p).

Basically, you need to buy a huscarl.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Wulzzz on February 09, 2011, 04:58:07 pm
People who think wooden shield protects you from archers are stupid.
You're better off running in a zig-zag than using most (non-heirloomed) shields with current shield balance.

I never said it gives perfect protection but still is enough.
Running like a maniac works too.
People who go around without wodden shield and don't try to dodge arrows shouldn't wonder why they are a primary target of archers and get killed rather often.

I mean some people just run almost straight over open field while archers shoot at them..just stupid.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 09, 2011, 05:23:03 pm
I'm not sure about the "low damage" of archery.

I usually run around in low/medium armor (highest I had was a 5k gold armor) so I always carry a shield on me because I die in 1-2 arrows.

I made a new char, I decided I could afford more expensive armor so I went for some heavy armor (cuir bouilli @ 10k gold is considered HEAVY to me) and I thought maybe I wouldn't have to carry around a shield because archers wouldn't kill me in 1-2 shots but I was wrong.

Basically, archers can do more damage than infantry and from RANGE, I know I can take 3 hits most of the time from infantry with a STRENGTH build, but if I come face to face with an archer 1 arrow will easily one hit me in my chest, maybe 2 arrows if I'm lucky.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mullerian on February 09, 2011, 05:39:15 pm
I'm not sure about the "low damage" of archery.

I usually run around in low/medium armor (highest I had was a 5k gold armor) so I always carry a shield on me because I die in 1-2 arrows.

I made a new char, I decided I could afford more expensive armor so I went for some heavy armor (cuir bouilli @ 10k gold is considered HEAVY to me) and I thought maybe I wouldn't have to carry around a shield because archers wouldn't kill me in 1-2 shots but I was wrong.

Basically, archers can do more damage than infantry and from RANGE, I know I can take 3 hits most of the time from infantry with a STRENGTH build, but if I come face to face with an archer 1 arrow will easily one hit me in my chest, maybe 2 arrows if I'm lucky.

lol

Also archery seems fine to me, im just adapting to using a 2 hander when they get closer now.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Camaris on February 09, 2011, 07:09:53 pm
I´m using Strongbow and have pd7 with 144 wpf.
I cant onehit most players if they wear anything above cloth.

I can onhit them if i make a headshot wich isnt really easy.
Some chars can die after 5 arrows some after two. Most of the players will die on the third arrow.
I guess thats ok.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Joxer on February 09, 2011, 07:51:05 pm
For disclaimer: I never had a problem with archers even before that big patch. I do play one occasionally. Mostly unshielded melee. That being said my archer alt is on hiatus atm. and that is because of the arrow speed nerf. I think archers deserve that changed back.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Punisher on February 09, 2011, 08:08:44 pm
The thing is archer should be a support class, and only skilled ones should top the scoreboards regulary. And this is how it is now, even an average archer is still great support for his team, he can make enemies enter melee combat with 1/2 HP, so they are a lot easier to kill by teammates (unfortunately average archers usually love to shoot in clusterfucks and teamdamage) while skilled archers get a lot of headshots and top the scoreboards.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: EponiCo on February 09, 2011, 08:11:28 pm
I think archery is fine.
Can take a lot of arrows to kill someone who is aware but since you have a ranged attack many people aren't.
Shields do protect a lot when you have shield skill, you can be shot into the feet and sides, but as a shield user I think this is really fair - against individual archers the larger shields should catch everything if angled correctly. 0 shield skill shields are kind of crappy, but so are 0 requirement weapons.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Wulzzz on February 09, 2011, 08:29:23 pm
Even wodden shield gives pretty much 100% defens against an archer if you move towards him.
Jump right before he shoots=he can't aim for feet or head
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Punisher on February 09, 2011, 08:41:45 pm
Wooden shield is crap with 0 shield skill (and what other reason you could have to use it), I'm better off zig-zagging instead. I use a Heater Shield (20x50 coverage, 2 shield skill) and still get hit often in the shoulders and feet, with only 2 shield skill you have no forcefield. On my 1h+shield char I was still getting hit in the shoulders/feet with a Norman Shield until I got 5 shield skill. So I really think low level shields don't offer much protection, compared to pre-patch when with 2 skill heater shield I had 100% protection.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Wulzzz on February 09, 2011, 08:46:07 pm
Prepatch even wodden shield had 100% forward protection..

Well. I used wodden shield on my new shield char.It's no jesus protection but still gives enough protection.
When archers aimed at my feet i just jumped.I never got hit in the feet or head that way.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Balton on February 09, 2011, 08:53:54 pm
It's pretty balanced now. There are still archers that take away 1/5 of my health when I wear full plate, and on occasion I get one-shotted off my horse in mail, or on foot in leather. But there are also archers that deal 0 damage per hit to my plate. It seems to all be in the build/level now.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 10, 2011, 02:55:53 am
poetry dog is right. That's not a headshot, it hit the shoulder or something

Yeah there is something buggy, where the arrow went through the head hit box and hit the body hit box behind it.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Rumblood on February 10, 2011, 08:57:32 am
Yeah there is something buggy, where the arrow went through the head hit box and hit the body hit box behind it.

Actually, it doesn't have to go through the head hit box. It registers a hit at the front edge of the body hit box, but the graphic of the arrow after it hits is displayed from the center of the body hit box, which displaces it a couple inches visually, which makes it look like it passed through the head to get there.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 10, 2011, 09:27:59 am
I've actually had this happen a whole slew of times.  Most of the time the arrow just passes right through the head without registering a hit, othertimes it will go through the head and hit the shoulder or neck.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Diomedes on February 10, 2011, 05:23:03 pm
I'm thinking of making an archer character to test the whole thing out.  I've never been an archer before so I won't have any strong preconceptions about what their power should be.  Does anyone know a good build that I should go for?  I really know nothing about building an archer character.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Magikarp on February 10, 2011, 05:33:48 pm
Archers are in a perfect state right now, now too powerful but not useless either.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Rumblood on February 11, 2011, 06:11:07 am
I'm thinking of making an archer character to test the whole thing out.  I've never been an archer before so I won't have any strong preconceptions about what their power should be.  Does anyone know a good build that I should go for?  I really know nothing about building an archer character.

I tried a Ath 8 WM 8 PD 5 PS 5 build that was really accurate and fast, but I was frustrated by the lack of stopping power. So Im going the opposite now with Athletics 5 WM 5 PD 8 and PS 8. It still has enough accuracy and the stopping power is great. The drawback is you only get 25 WPF in a melee weapon, but with PS 8, you only need one hit oftentimes  :wink:
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Rogue_Eagle on February 13, 2011, 02:49:52 am
I'd rather they made archers a  bit harder to use and gave them a huge damage buff to compensate.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: corto on February 13, 2011, 03:04:29 am
i'm with magicarp - its fine at the moment.

but what i miss is a changelog or just some infos about the effect of Powerdraw (it reduced wpf in the last c-rpg version - does it still do so?)

i really dont want to check it out by messing my build away from accuracy to damage - that does not really exist because u dont hit shit and so the dmg isnt dealt...
I am at 5 Pdraw and its fine but a bit weak against armor... so help me out and tell me your experiences with pdraw since the patch.

edith: i see 2 posts earlier someone made it - thx for that  :wink:
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Z_E_N on February 13, 2011, 04:04:04 am
The only input I have on this...

A great player should be able to top the scoreboard no matter what build he uses.  You know all the famous players already I'm sure.

I see great 1h/shielders top scoreboards.
I see 2h/polearms top scoreboards.
I see cavs top scoreboards.

However, all the famous archers are suddenly no longer topping the scoreboard ever using pure archery...so it's probably a bit underbalanced. 

Title: Re: Archery
Post by: bruce on February 13, 2011, 04:08:26 am
A great player should be able to top the scoreboard no matter what build he uses.

I haven't seen pure 1h no shield dagger users top the scoreboard, I haven't seen a pure staffman top the scoreboard, hell I haven't seen a pure thrower without a melee weapon top the scoreboard often, or a pure crossbow without melee weapon, I haven't seen a pure pitchforker top the scoreboard, I didn't see any 3/40 agi builds top the scoreboard, etc... I'm going to have to disagree with you there ;)

Anyway, I have seen archers postpatch on top of the scoreboard - the ones which in addition to shooting also know how to melee (or in really archer-heaven maps) as well.



Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Korgoth on February 13, 2011, 05:07:45 am
I haven't seen a pure pitchforker top the scoreboard,

Clearly You haven't played a lot with Tai Feng.

He has topped the board with a Pitch Fork before. But it was a Military Fork :)

EDIT: Just did this now. Look at my gear.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Z_E_N on February 13, 2011, 05:37:11 am
I haven't seen pure 1h no shield dagger users top the scoreboard, I haven't seen a pure staffman top the scoreboard, hell I haven't seen a pure thrower without a melee weapon top the scoreboard often, or a pure crossbow without melee weapon, I haven't seen a pure pitchforker top the scoreboard, I didn't see any 3/40 agi builds top the scoreboard, etc... I'm going to have to disagree with you there ;)

Anyway, I have seen archers postpatch on top of the scoreboard - the ones which in addition to shooting also know how to melee (or in really archer-heaven maps) as well.

Sorry bruce, but your argument is off.

I was specifying equipment _types_, not specific gear.  Obviously someone running around in joke gear isn't going to top the scoreboard.

When an entire weapon group put into the hands of a great player who is playing seriously cant manage to be on the top, then its definately underpowered a little.

And I have seen pure throwers top the leaderboards; but it doesn't happen often because of the ammo limitation.  Native_ATS comes to mind.   
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: bruce on February 13, 2011, 10:02:59 am
When an entire weapon group put into the hands of a great player who is playing seriously cant manage to be on the top, then its definately underpowered a little.

But I topped the scoreboard now and then with my archer and with my crossbowman - and I'm not really some pro player. Sure thing, most of the kills were in melee, with some ranged kills (or wounding people, more common thing), but I'm sure you see where the problem is if you can top the scoreboards with just a bow/crossbow. This isn't native, ranged aren't restricted to using silly onehanders with low to no powerstrike.

And I'd say it was easier to get kills on the whole as a hybrid ranged + melee then pure melee (with shield to "protect" from ranged), from my experience.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 14, 2011, 05:32:59 pm
The only input I have on this...

A great player should be able to top the scoreboard no matter what build he uses.  You know all the famous players already I'm sure.

I see great 1h/shielders top scoreboards.
I see 2h/polearms top scoreboards.
I see cavs top scoreboards.

However, all the famous archers are suddenly no longer topping the scoreboard ever using pure archery...so it's probably a bit underbalanced.


One thing you have to understand is Topping the scoreboard =/= balance, I once topped a scoreboard with a wooden practice sword, does it makes the wooden practice sword overpowered? Not so much.

I've saw Qaki top the scoreboard on a couple of occasions and he's an archer.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: EponiCo on February 14, 2011, 08:37:43 pm
I have some screens with archers or crossbowmen topping the scoreboards.
If I hadn't formated I'd also have screens of throwers without melee weapon topping the scoreboard. Whether they carry a axe or sword or just have the ps to pick one up on the floor doesn't interest me. They can do it easily. A pure ranger relying on camping or running for defence shouldn't kill many people easily (he can endanger you always, but often you are in no position to get him).
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Murchad on February 14, 2011, 09:05:35 pm
archers are not underpowered in the least.
you do have to make comprimises in other areas to make them really powerful and heirlooming helps alot.  you have to have them balanced to the best possible archer.

something similar to this
level 35
27/18
9pd
5ps
6ath
6wm
warbow Gen3= 61spd 54shspd 30cut 98acc
bodkin arrows Gen3= 9pierce 19ammo

I don't want them to buff archers only to nerf them again when someone reaches the peak of archers
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Rumblood on February 15, 2011, 12:47:50 am
I agree that you can't judge the effectiveness of an archer by the scoreboards. On rounds where I'll go 1-1, if it counted them, I would also have 4-5 assists and 1-4 horses killed. That's a lot of contribution that simply will not show up on the scoreboards  :!:
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 15, 2011, 03:07:58 am
I think a good judge for whether archery is viable or not is if players with shields stop raising them because they don't care if they get hit by an arrow or not, because they do little or no damage.  Also arrows are so telegraphed with the new animation that it's very easy to dodge them.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: bruce on February 15, 2011, 03:10:00 am
I think a good judge for whether archery is viable or not is if players with shields stop raising them because they don't care if they get hit by an arrow or not

And they're damn well raising them, unless they see a hunting bow. I don't get where you pulled the "they do little to no damage" from.


Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Blondin on February 15, 2011, 04:00:12 am
I always raise my shield or move in zig-zag, and sometimes when there are lot of archers, i rather grab a bigger shield.
Arrows do damages between 1/4 and 1/2 of my life, headshots always kill me.
Raising my shield is more like a survival instinct.

Btw, with a 1handed weapon you need 3 to 5 hits to kill a guy, with the risk that he strikes back.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Vexus on February 15, 2011, 01:34:46 pm
Thing is round shields block everything thrown at them and whenever I see someone with a round shield I either have to run for help or try to hit him from the sides since the forcefield makes him block head and feet at the same time which is retarded.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: weight on February 15, 2011, 02:33:35 pm
Btw, with a 1handed weapon you need 3 to 5 hits to kill a guy, with the risk that he strikes back.

I've been killed in 2hits by a sidesword when I was wearing plate armor.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mattressi on February 15, 2011, 02:46:29 pm
I've been killed in 2hits by a sidesword when I was wearing plate armor.

Yep, I can confirm that I've killed a guy in plate (had the Great Helmet on) with 2 shots to the head using my side sword. Left to right slashes almost always hit the head and are hard to see. I had 3 PS and 11 str at the time.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Memento_Mori on February 15, 2011, 02:52:54 pm
My archer hybrid says that archery is pretty balanced, I make it to the top of the score boards some times which really impresses me since all I read on the forums is that "archery is impossible, a waste of time, does no damage hurr hurr hurr"
5 pd 135 wpp using Khergit or Strongbow depending on the map, decent accuracy & okay damage + once they get close I just pull out my beast of a 2h sword and cleave the wounded enemy in half.
my shieldless infantry screams like a little girl when he sees a crap load of archers, so I guess he says it's balanced as well.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Vygar on February 15, 2011, 03:30:08 pm
I think Archery is lacking.  Projectile speeds need to be increased.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Chasab on February 15, 2011, 03:46:31 pm
last night on the NA 100 server we were playing the map where one team starts on a boat, and the other starts inside a high walled fortress with a little river inside.

one team had close to 15 archers. they formed a line and just mowed us down. it was ridiculous.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: 3ABP on February 15, 2011, 05:27:56 pm
ATM all main bow line (Khergit, Strong, War)bows are fine.
Not OP at all. But not under powered too.

Khergits bow is just fine for headshots in close combats and to "remove blocks" to help your melee teammates.
Strong bow is very good at medium range.
War bow - is just universal weapon for all distance.

ATM we observing very good picture - what and archer can kill someone and infantry can survive some shots (not to die from 1-2 as before).

I (as archer) like current situation (because understand - what any time all can be changed to for the worse :) )

P.s. today archer are alive and have ability to shoot olny when enemy team allowing them to do this.
I am about Xbows and Shielders. If enemy team don't like to see archers alive - they dead. Or just have not targets to shoot at because of shield wall attacking their positions.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Rumblood on February 15, 2011, 11:04:44 pm
Archery is fine except for longbow, but I would be content to never use it, rather than fart around with the entire system again  :!:
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Stormcrow on February 15, 2011, 11:57:18 pm
Quote
one team had close to 15 archers. they formed a line and just mowed us down. it was ridiculous.

yes archery is extremly effective when combined with teamwork. Archery is really fine the way it is. The only thing that needs a slight buff is the amount of tiume you can hold ashot for before it becomes inaccurate. Even an extra .5sec would be a reasonable boost.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 19, 2011, 04:52:25 am
I think this thread has served it's purpose, a general consensus seems to be that it is balanced or a little under balanced.  I'd like to see more screenshots of non-lethal headshots.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Boss_Awesome on February 23, 2011, 12:35:11 am
last night on the NA 100 server we were playing the map where one team starts on a boat, and the other starts inside a high walled fortress with a little river inside.

one team had close to 15 archers. they formed a line and just mowed us down. it was ridiculous.

I think my archer was involved in that, along with the OP  :twisted:  We had a squad of six archers on Teamspeak and then there were some other random archers that would follow our squad around.  Archers are awesome when working in a group.  On their own i think they are a bit under balanced.  Arrows are starting to get pretty slow, where you can see them coming and dodge like Neo in the matrix.  Archers can learn to lead people more to compensate for their speed and still hit them, it just feels kinda silly. I don't mind the changes to archery but not when throwers were unaffected.  They can throw 3 axes in the time it takes me to shoot 1 arrow, they can have a shield out, they can move and throw and they do more damage. 
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: 3ABP on February 23, 2011, 01:14:36 pm
... I'd like to see more screenshots of non-lethal headshots.
Just "pick up" any archer (do you have a friend - archer?) and go to EU3 and make as much as screenshots as you want.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Loki on February 27, 2011, 09:44:50 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


What I believe is happening is the arrow is going through the head hitbox, not registering, then registering on the body hitbox.  I've noticed sometimes the arrow will pass through the first person entirely and hit the person behind them.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: 3ABP on February 27, 2011, 12:04:38 pm
In above case - yes. It (theoreticaly) can be head box missed.
Because usually arrows showing on the head only when you are dead ^)

Now just try to make a headshot (in duel) while both opponents are on one layer (not shoot from top-down and so on).
And you'll see what even ideal horizontal arrow don't kill (depends of course... but I several times survived after 2 arrows in the head).

P.s. not from hunting bow.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Fraemi on February 27, 2011, 12:08:49 pm
In above case - yes. It (theoreticaly) can be head box missed.
Because usually arrows showing on the head only when you are dead ^)

Now just try to make a headshot (in duel) while both opponents are on one layer (not shoot from top-down and so on).
And you'll see what even ideal horizontal arrow don't kill (depends of course... but I several times survived after 2 arrows in the head).

Google translate or your fifth grade english doesnt quite cut it. Here is a tip for you: Dont formulate sentences in your native language and then translate words.
Stop butchering english.

I voted its a little underbalanced. I play 2h and never carry shields (easier to zigzag and most archers deal about 1/4-1/5th hp damage to me in mid armour and no IF anyhow).
While I really dont want it to be as powerful as in native it could use a slight buff. Also, it seems archery is very reliant on having heirloomed weapons, that shouldnt be the case with any "class" imo.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 27, 2011, 05:29:29 pm
Google translate or your fifth grade english doesnt quite cut it. Here is a tip for you: Dont formulate sentences in your native language and then translate words.
Stop butchering english.

Here is a tip, do not be an arrogant ass on the forums and say things you would not say in real-life to someone's face. If English is not his/her first language then grammatical errors are to be at most pointed out, not attacked outright. Stop butchering manners.

Also if you are going to completely attack someone on how they are speaking, you damn best speak perfect English yourself. The first thing I noticed was that you failed to capitalize English, which is honestly either extremely lazy, or a complete and utter fail on your part for ignoring one of the most fundamental rules of English. Next, why did you say "Dont" instead of "Don't?" If you are using contractions, spell the damn things correctly. The list goes on, like your fascination with comma splices and other elementary mistakes. Good job being an example on how to type English.

Grow up and stop nitpicking someone for how they spell or formulate sentences. I knew what the poster was trying to convey, so I highly doubt you don't. Sorry to see you woke up on the wrong side of the bed, I hope the next day is better for you.

Look at this post for example, littered with many errors, yet still perfectly understandable... Honestly...
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Fraemi on February 27, 2011, 06:45:33 pm
Here is a tip, do not be an arrogant ass on the forums and say things you would not say in real-life to someone's face. If English is not his/her first language then grammatical errors are to be at most pointed out, not attacked outright. Stop butchering manners.

Also if you are going to completely attack someone on how they are speaking, you damn best speak perfect English yourself. The first thing I noticed was that you failed to capitalize English, which is honestly either extremely lazy, or a complete and utter fail on your part for ignoring one of the most fundamental rules of English. Next, why did you say "Dont" instead of "Don't?" If you are using contractions, spell the damn things correctly. The list goes on, like your fascination with comma splices and other elementary mistakes. Good job being an example on how to type English.

Grow up and stop nitpicking someone for how they spell or formulate sentences. I knew what the poster was trying to convey, so I highly doubt you don't. Sorry to see you woke up on the wrong side of the bed, I hope the next day is better for you.

Look at this post for example, littered with many errors, yet still perfectly understandable... Honestly...

As much as I hate to go on with this mini-drama...

We exchanged pms afterwards and I apologized to him. I hope you find this satisfactionary. I admit I made several mistakes myself, but I simply have had to re-read his posts several times on this forum and I woke up on the wrong side of the bed as well.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 27, 2011, 07:59:55 pm
Time to move to topic huh?

The only reason that made me almost quit archery alltogether was the crap damage, i'm not expecting to 2 or 3 shot people, but for example this:
On the map (village by the river or W/E its called) i had these stats: 171WPF,18str/26agi 6PD,,2ath,0ps,8WM and these items: 3.5 weight armor (no head/glove armor), a warbow loomed for the second time and bodkins, what made me rage is... i shoot a ninja in the head.. he survives... a second later i shoot a medium inf in the head (kettle helmet)... he survives..both shots were close-medium range... i mean cmon.. people say aim for the head.. what for? I can live with the crap damage that we make,but atleast make headshots lethal...
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: UrLukur on February 27, 2011, 08:19:23 pm
Time to move to topic huh?

The only reason that made me almost quit archery alltogether was the crap damage, i'm not expecting to 2 or 3 shot people, but for example this:
On the map (village by the river or W/E its called) i had these stats: 171WPF,18str/26agi 6PD,,2ath,0ps,8WM and these items: 3.5 weight armor (no head/glove armor), a warbow loomed for the second time and bodkins, what made me rage is... i shoot a ninja in the head.. he survives... a second later i shoot a medium inf in the head (kettle helmet)... he survives..both shots were close-medium range... i mean cmon.. people say aim for the head.. what for? I can live with the crap damage that we make,but atleast make headshots lethal...

Get a grip, what would be point of wearing helmets when mr.nobody with crap bow can one shoot people in the head. It's not CS.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 27, 2011, 08:50:58 pm
Get a grip, what would be point of wearing helmets when mr.nobody with crap bow can one shoot people in the head. It's not CS.

Go troll somewhere else.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 27, 2011, 08:57:46 pm
Get a grip, what would be point of wearing helmets when mr.nobody with crap bow can one shoot people in the head. It's not CS.

He hardly listed nobody stats
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: UrLukur on February 27, 2011, 09:02:04 pm
Go troll somewhere else.

Actually, you troll. Head hitbox is rough equivalent of rl head, including head protection. Arrow, hitting such head protection, called helmet over mail coif over padding, can fail to penetrate it, change trajectory (ie. deflect) or inflic non fatal wound. Therefore asking for lethal headshots for AGI build is nonsense.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 27, 2011, 09:31:00 pm
Actually, you troll. Head hitbox is rough equivalent of rl head, including head protection. Arrow, hitting such head protection, called helmet over mail coif over padding, can fail to penetrate it, change trajectory (ie. deflect) or inflic non fatal wound. Therefore asking for lethal headshots for AGI build is nonsense.

What the hell? You are talking about real life in this kind of discussion? In a game that isnt aiming at realism  but balance? Look whos trolling...
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: UrLukur on February 27, 2011, 09:32:32 pm
What the hell? You are talking about real life in this kind of discussion? In a game that isnt aiming at realism  but balance? Look whos trolling...

Gamebalance tell us that something that is not too hard to do should not give great reward. Head is big. Archers have many chances to hit it. Helmets cost, lower your running speed, lower your profs. They should give something.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Nihtgenga on February 27, 2011, 09:42:39 pm

What I believe is happening is the arrow is going through the head hitbox, not registering, then registering on the body hitbox.  I've noticed sometimes the arrow will pass through the first person entirely and hit the person behind them.

mh...I have seen this quite often, especially the first two pics.
the person got an arrow in its back or shoulder when he was running/raising his arm or what ever. now like  in the pictures when the arm his hanging loose it looks like the arrow went through the head, which it didnt when it was shot at the person. just an animation inaccuracy.

if you had moved behind the person or he would have raised the arm for an attack its easy to notice.

although the hitboxes are weird sometimes, I can see a projectile flying past my head and the next milisecond it kills me ;-)
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 27, 2011, 09:44:09 pm
Gamebalance tell us that something that is not too hard to do should not give great reward. Head is big. Archers have many chances to hit it. Helmets cost, lower your running speed, lower your profs. They should give something.

How many times do you get headshotten? Honestly? Only few people aim at heads and actually do it on purpose and actually hit anything. And im preety sure you arent using helmets only against ranged...*hint* melee *hint*.... about headshot damage... i would understand if the enemy was using a plate helm... but honestly.. a ninja (like 10 armor or less helm?) survives from the best 6PD statwise L31 archer possible? (almost no ath,no PS,etc)..
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: UrLukur on February 27, 2011, 10:02:15 pm
How many times do you get headshotten? Honestly? Only few people aim at heads and actually do it on purpose and actually hit anything. And im preety sure you arent using helmets only against ranged...*hint* melee *hint*.... about headshot damage... i would understand if the enemy was using a plate helm... but honestly.. a ninja (like 10 armor or less helm?) survives from the best 6PD statwise L31 archer possible? (almost no ath,no PS,etc)..

PS 6 ? Not best bow ? Against melee helmets are not good, at best they can make sucky hits from 1h bounce off, solid hits are one hit kills, 2h or pole hits are one hit kill too. Many times i was headshot'd .

Main problem of helmets is that they sucks against big hits, and all hits against heads are big hits, especially those with good speedbonus.

Problem of helmets lies in low reduction values and high soak values.

Oh, and you shoot from long range, you lose damage when shooting over long range.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 27, 2011, 10:06:25 pm
Hell, just go pd10, it gives you an accuracy bonus and kills everything in 1-2 arrows.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 27, 2011, 10:07:12 pm
PS 6 ? Not best bow ? Against melee helmets are not good, at best they can make sucky hits from 1h bounce off, solid hits are one hit kills, 2h or pole hits are one hit kill too. Many times i was headshot'd .

Main problem of helmets is that they sucks against big hits, and all hits against heads are big hits, especially those with good speedbonus.

Problem of helmets lies in low reduction values and high soak values.

Yep, 6PD and most WPF possible to get by L31 with 6PD(even if i would convert the 2ath leaving me with 27agi,i wouldnt have enough for 9WM,not at L31), and the warbow im using has 1cut damage less than longbow (once its MW,its going to do the same damage as LB).... about helmets again... go to a duel and duel for a hour with a helm (35+ armor) and then without helm... you'll see the difference so cut that shit out.


Hell, just go pd10, it gives you an accuracy bonus and kills everything in 1-2 arrows.

PD kills wpf therefore it kills damage, accuracy AND speed , while the damage is abit better in the end the accuracy will be worse than 9PT throwing lances with 90WPF while running.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: UrLukur on February 27, 2011, 10:08:56 pm
Hell, just go pd10, it gives you an accuracy bonus and kills everything in 1-2 arrows.

Right, i forget about it. Use adequate bow, khergit or nomad fit this build best, use either.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 27, 2011, 10:09:15 pm
PROTIP: prof is overrated and almost useless past 120ish post patch, just go PD 10, you get like 14% damage bonus per PD compared to like 17.5% damage bonus per 100 prof, just stop stacking WM and prof like a stupid fuck.

I hope you realize PD over bow req = accuracy right?
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 27, 2011, 10:13:59 pm


I hope you realize PD over bow req = accuracy right?

Oh god,what have i done so wrong with  my 11PD spec for it to be so innacurate?
Backup what you have just said.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 27, 2011, 10:14:58 pm
11PD SPEC HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I AM MTEMKO AND I CANNOT INTO GAME MECHANICS :)))))))))))))))


That's why I hate arguing about balance, 90% of the time it's players who doesn't know jack shit about the game mechanics or just suck at the game OR BOTH.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Cup1d on February 27, 2011, 10:17:28 pm
Quote
I hope you realize PD over bow req = accuracy right?

No. It doesnt work with strongbow, longbow and warbow.
So, please, stop suggesting about archery. You just dont know what you speak about.


Mte, dont waste your time on trolls.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 27, 2011, 10:18:17 pm
Speaking? Oh shit am I in teamspeak? holy fuck.

Also, just for the record, I have an archer with 90 prof and I can effectively and easily hit people from far away, either you're doing something wrong or you just suck massively at the game.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Gurnisson on February 27, 2011, 11:22:09 pm
Against melee helmets are not good, at best they can make sucky hits from 1h bounce off, solid hits are one hit kills, 2h or pole hits are one hit kill too.

I'm sorry, but you've got absolutely no clue of what you're talking about. You know that a spiked club (1H) can one-hit a guy without a helmet, while it will bounce or deal carp damage on anyone with 20 head armor or more? Roughly.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Adamar on February 27, 2011, 11:44:47 pm
I have 6 pd for longbow use and 138 wp for archery and My reticule still wont let me head shoot people about 10 metters away.

edit: Only people who actualy play as archers should be allowed to vote on this one.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 12:07:22 am
I have 6 pd for longbow use and 138 wp for archery and My reticule still wont let me head shoot people about 10 metters away.

edit: Only people who actualy play as archers should be allowed to vote on this one.

You can still headshot people, reticule has nothing to do unless you need pin point to be able to shoot anything, I have FAR from a pin point reticule but I still know how to aim someone for an headshot.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Nemeth on February 28, 2011, 12:19:01 am
Oh god,what have i done so wrong with  my 11PD spec for it to be so innacurate?
Backup what you have just said.

Maybe beacause with 11 PD your wpf is shit? Kesh did the testing, just browse the countless threads about archery and you'll find what you are looking for.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 12:33:21 am
Maybe beacause with 11 PD your wpf is shit? Kesh did the testing, just browse the countless threads about archery and you'll find what you are looking for.

I know it is shit,thats why i asked him to back up his theory.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 12:44:15 am
What the shit bro, in the PM you sent me why did you ask if it adds wpf, I never said it added wpf :/.

My theory is still proven.

FROM MTEMKO

After a hour of chatting with mod developers on irc i have come to this:

22:34:18 Fasader: 1pd 200wpf is worse in accuracy than 2pd 200wpf
22:35:49 Fasader: 6PD 200wpf is better in accuracy than 10pd 200wpf.

[23:04] <Mtemtko> What about this "myth" ,if the PD is higher than the bows requirement, you gain wpf?
[23:06] <Urist> No
[23:08] <Urist> there was a mathematical fuckup in trhe past i think, that allowed a wpf increase instead of reduce with very low pd

[22:43] <Urist> 1 wpf is probably the same for all pds becasue the formular cant lower wpf below 0
caps war:
[23:54] <+Mtemtko>  TELL ME WHEN DOES THE BONUS CHANGE,AT WHAT PD?
[23:56] <@Fasader> I HAVE NO IDEA AND I CANNOT BE ARSED TO TEST IT AGAIN
[00:02] <@Fasader> but I don't know the numbers
[00:02] <Mtemtko> you just arent allowed to tell,but you know
[00:02] <@Fasader> I know how to calculate it
[00:02] <@Fasader> but I don't know the numbers

I hope this explains somethings.

FROM A GOOD FRIEND

Blue: Wow
Blue: Mtemtko doesn't even know what the fuck he's talking about
Blue: It was:
Blue: if you had PD x
Blue: and your WPF was beyond the 1:1 WPF ratio
Blue: you acquired BONUS WPF
Blue: the MORE WPF YOU GAINED.
Blue: That's why Kesh was able to MACHINEGUN
Blue: RATTATATATATAT
Blue: with only PD1 or whatever
Blue: Because the lowest PD = LOL SUPERHIGH ARCHERY WPF BECAUSE YOU ONLY GET PENALIZED TO LIKE 40 WPF
Blue: AFTER THAT YOU GET BONUS WPF OUT OF NOWHERE
Blue: [23:08] <Urist> there was a mathematical fuckup in trhe past i think, that allowed a wpf increase instead of reduce with very low pd
Blue: Urist is correct.
Blue: Of course, you didn't have to have very low PD
Blue: you could do it with 5
Blue: and lol i am an agi stacking fuckhat with retirement WPF bonus
Blue: eat my shit and smile please
Blue: 22:35:49 Fasader: 6PD 200wpf is better in accuracy than 10pd 200wpf.
Blue: This I call bullshit.
Blue: Fasaderp doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
Blue: He doesn't even know how armor works.
Blue: Fuck his shit.


Also, I never said the PD over bow req gave any wpf, I NEVER mentionned that, not sure where you're getting that.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 12:59:27 am
(click to show/hide)

I meant PD over bow req giving accuracy not wpf, i looked at the two as if they were same-so you are correct.
About fasaderp, just a small hint- he is the mod developer.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:02:59 am
(click to show/hide)

I meant PD over bow req giving accuracy not wpf, i looked at the two as if they were same-so you are correct.
About fasaderp, just a small hint- he is the mod developer.

He still doesn't know how armor works, hell, Canary has LOGS of fasaderp saying himself he has no fucking clue how armor works.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 01:07:31 am
He still doesn't know how armor works, hell, Canary has LOGS of fasaderp saying himself he has no fucking clue how armor works.

Well i dont know about the armor thing, but after talking to cmpx and urist they both said that they arent sure about how the algorythm works so they pointed me to fasader.
The only one else that knows for sure is chadz.. but good luck getting answers from him :D
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:09:55 am
Well i dont know about the armor thing, but after talking to cmpx and urist they both said that they arent sure about how the algorythm works so they pointed me to fasader.
The only one else that knows for sure is chadz.. but good luck getting answers from him :D

Apparently no one knows the game mechanics properly, which is why some players are doing tests, for exemple gafferjack did a full WM build (up to 210 ish prof) just to test how much points you needed to up your prof past a certain number, he also did the PD increasing accuracy test, and he's currently in the process of testing WM with armor.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 01:14:17 am
Apparently no one knows the game mechanics properly

Well that is partly wrong- some stuff is hardcoded for example PD always increases WPF but in CRPG the WPF is decreased enough for it to be in minus.
the developers themselves made the mechanics and have certain formulas to find out (afterall ,how do you think they changed so many stat effects?)
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:16:08 am
Yeah but even then, like I said I have logs of fasaderp saying he doesn't know the game mechanics of a game he's part of, he's also an asshat.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 01:17:59 am
Yeah but even then, like I said I have logs of fasaderp saying he doesn't know the game mechanics of a game he's part of, he's also an asshat.

Well you could also assume the fact he didn't want to tell you guys the info, afterall.. some of it is meant to stay a secret.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:19:00 am
Well you could also assume the fact he didn't want to tell you guys the info, afterall.. some of it is meant to stay a secret.

I'm fine with not being told the infos, but he blatantly said he had no idea how the armors worked.

And with the dev team this game has, I wouldn't be surprised if that was true.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 01:22:30 am
I'm fine with not being told the infos, but he blatantly said he had no idea how the armors worked.

And with the dev team this game has, I wouldn't be surprised if that was true.

I asked him the precise number that changed wpf bonus from plus to minus (the 200wpf 6pd>10pd 200wpf   200wpf 2pd>200wpf 3pd thing)
he was saying he doesnt know for a while,then he said he knows how to get the number with a formula but couldnt be bothered.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:23:32 am
I asked him the precise number that changed wpf bonus from plus to minus (the 200wpf 6pd>10pd 200wpf   200wpf 2pd>200wpf 3pd thing)
he was saying he doesnt know for a while,then he said he knows how to get the number with a formula but couldnt be bothered.

Exactly, so it shows that he doesn't know how shit work unless he actually bother checking except he's too lazy to.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 01:42:02 am
What the shit bro, in the PM you sent me why did you ask if it adds wpf, I never said it added wpf :/.

My theory is still proven.

FROM MTEMKO

After a hour of chatting with mod developers on irc i have come to this:

22:34:18 Fasader: 1pd 200wpf is worse in accuracy than 2pd 200wpf
22:35:49 Fasader: 6PD 200wpf is better in accuracy than 10pd 200wpf.

[23:04] <Mtemtko> What about this "myth" ,if the PD is higher than the bows requirement, you gain wpf?
[23:06] <Urist> No
[23:08] <Urist> there was a mathematical fuckup in trhe past i think, that allowed a wpf increase instead of reduce with very low pd

[22:43] <Urist> 1 wpf is probably the same for all pds becasue the formular cant lower wpf below 0
caps war:
[23:54] <+Mtemtko>  TELL ME WHEN DOES THE BONUS CHANGE,AT WHAT PD?
[23:56] <@Fasader> I HAVE NO IDEA AND I CANNOT BE ARSED TO TEST IT AGAIN
[00:02] <@Fasader> but I don't know the numbers
[00:02] <Mtemtko> you just arent allowed to tell,but you know
[00:02] <@Fasader> I know how to calculate it
[00:02] <@Fasader> but I don't know the numbers

I hope this explains somethings.

FROM A GOOD FRIEND

Blue: Wow
Blue: Mtemtko doesn't even know what the fuck he's talking about
Blue: It was:
Blue: if you had PD x
Blue: and your WPF was beyond the 1:1 WPF ratio
Blue: you acquired BONUS WPF
Blue: the MORE WPF YOU GAINED.
Blue: That's why Kesh was able to MACHINEGUN
Blue: RATTATATATATAT
Blue: with only PD1 or whatever
Blue: Because the lowest PD = LOL SUPERHIGH ARCHERY WPF BECAUSE YOU ONLY GET PENALIZED TO LIKE 40 WPF
Blue: AFTER THAT YOU GET BONUS WPF OUT OF NOWHERE
Blue: [23:08] <Urist> there was a mathematical fuckup in trhe past i think, that allowed a wpf increase instead of reduce with very low pd
Blue: Urist is correct.
Blue: Of course, you didn't have to have very low PD
Blue: you could do it with 5
Blue: and lol i am an agi stacking fuckhat with retirement WPF bonus
Blue: eat my shit and smile please
Blue: 22:35:49 Fasader: 6PD 200wpf is better in accuracy than 10pd 200wpf.
Blue: This I call bullshit.
Blue: Fasaderp doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
Blue: He doesn't even know how armor works.
Blue: Fuck his shit.


Also, I never said the PD over bow req gave any wpf, I NEVER mentionned that, not sure where you're getting that.

Blue is a color, not a name, so he cant be a friend!!

Unless he is ur imaginary friend?

If u stack PD u get inaccurate, if u stack more points in WM, then WPF u get more accurate...
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:45:28 am
Blue is a color, not a name, so he cant be a friend!!

Unless he is ur imaginary friend?

If u stack PD u get inaccurate, if u stack more points in WM, then WPF u get more accurate...

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,876.msg11499.html#msg11499

Explain your lack of game mechanics knowledge Ragnar. EXPLAIN.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 01:50:43 am
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,876.msg11499.html#msg11499

Explain your lack of game mechanics knowledge Ragnar. EXPLAIN.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:51:24 am
Thanks for proving my point that you don't actually know anything  :wink:.

I AM FURIOUS.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 01:53:00 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:53:25 am
I AM FURIOUS.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on February 28, 2011, 01:55:21 am
Hearsay is never a valid method of acquiring information. Gafferjackson is doing and has done various tests, and I am currently looking into leveling various archer characters to test the Archery myths. Ragnar, please try to keep your posts at least somewhat interesting.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 01:57:35 am
Well i can tell u one thing, ive been playing as a archer since early beta....
Until the "new patch".

Archers got nerfed because of theyre awewome aim with Wpf and PD, so they nerfed them...And they made them inacccurate if u stack more PD!

PS: My posts are very interesting...

U MAD BRO?
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 01:58:45 am
Not exactly, I'm actually more annoyed by the lost braincells and your stupidity.

you were 0/10 troll, but 2/10 for persistent troll now.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on February 28, 2011, 01:59:36 am
Until the new patch. Until the new patch. Makes sense, that really helps with figuring out how the mechanics work Post Patch. Thank you for your valuable information and imagespam. I now direct you to a board which specializes in your type of randumb posting. http://boards.4chan.org/b/ Good day sir.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 02:02:24 am
RagnarLodBroke

Age: 20

Hehe.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 02:02:56 am
Until the new patch. Until the new patch. Makes sense, that really helps with figuring out how the mechanics work Post Patch. Thank you for your valuable information and imagespam. I now direct you to a board which specializes in your type of randumb posting. http://boards.4chan.org/b/ Good day sir.

Im pretty sure posting a site like that might get u banned!

And ive been playing as a archer after the new patch aswell, but i was inaccurate and all the fun was gone. I had 7 or 8 pD with 100+ wpf, still inaccurate, before the new patch i had 219 wpf and 6 Pd, accurate as hell!

Btw: im not the retarded person in this discussion...
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 02:04:42 am
RagnarLodBroke

Age: 20

Hehe.

Atleast i have the balls to let ppls see my age ;)

And i really feel sry for u if ur a 40 year old guy..(No offense)
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 02:06:06 am
Yeah well, what do you expect? Going from 219 wpf 6 PD to 100 wpf 7-8 PD, there's a reason why everyone is getting less wpf, exactly so everyone isn't accurate as hell and one hit everything (Which consequently still happens).

Also the way you type despite being 20 (apparently) makes me think you're the retarded person in the discussion, specially when all you've been doing so far was spam stuff like "umad bro" and post dumb pictures that would belong to 4chan much more than here instead of bringing in valid points to the argument.

And for the record, I'm 19.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Bothersome_Aldryk on February 28, 2011, 02:06:14 am
I have been able to do well by playing dedicated archer characters, such as my friend Xocoyol's char. As well, I am currently leveling a couple archers characters, as stated. I will be able to provide a refreshing, un-butthurt look at Archers from the viewpoint of a person who did not play a high level archer pre-patch, who has played every other major playstyle. Until you can bring in similarly valid input, I think you should confine your anger to the spam boards.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 02:07:58 am
Yeah well, what do you expect? Going from 219 wpf 6 PD to 100 wpf 7-8 PD, there's a reason why everyone is getting less wpf, exactly so everyone isn't accurate as hell and one hit everything (Which consequently still happens).

Also the way you type despite being 20 (apparently) makes me think you're the retarded person in the discussion, specially when all you've been doing so far was spam stuff like "umad bro" and post dumb pictures that would belong to 4chan much more than here instead of bringing in valid points to the argument.

And for the record, I'm 19.

hmmm, i dont see the damn reason to post this then:

RagnarLodBroke

Age: 20

Hehe.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 02:08:52 am
Because you act like you're 8 years old despite being an adult.

You also type like you're 8 years old.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 02:11:44 am
Because you act like you're 8 years old despite being an adult.

its called having a sense of humor!

I think you should confine your anger to the spam boards.

Im pretty much calm, dunno whyu think im angry.
Did u even take a look at the stuff fasader wrote? He is a damn Admin, and he's in touch with chadz most of the time.

And chadz is the "God" of this mod :)


Because you act like you're 8 years old despite being an adult.

You also type like you're 8 years old.

My English is understandable, English is not aLanguage i use that often, cuz im a Norwegian...
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 02:13:16 am
its called having a sense of humor!

Im pretty much calm, dunno whyu think im angry.
Did u even take a look at the stuff fasader wrote? He is a damn Admin, and he's in touch with chadz most of the time.

And chadz is the "God" of this mod :)

A sense of humor implies humor, something you lack.

As for fasaderp,

 [11:10] <+Gnjus> Shik please come back to modifiying items, Fasader is a lazy bastard and all he ever does is nerfing :-d
[11:10] <@Fasader> nurf
[11:11] <+Gnjus> god damn Smurf McNurf
[11:11] <@Shik> :P
[11:11] <@Shik> I don't really want to touch the items since I have no idea about what's OP or not
[11:11] <@Shik> since I haven't been playing
[11:12] <+Gnjus> well you can do any worse then Fasa
[11:12] <@Fasader> :x
[11:12] <+Gnjus> he plays too much and his "knowledge" is twisted and biased :-D
[11:12] <@Fasader> I'm destroying shields atm
[11:12] <@Fasader> I mean
[11:12] <@Fasader> buffing
[11:12] <+Gnjus> balancing will do, no need to buff or destroy :-D
[11:13] <+Gnjus> btw you should do something about those 2 ashtray shields.....they are a joke
[11:13] <@Fasader> cmpxchg8b do you know how shield hits work armor-wise?
[11:13] <@Fasader> does the damage just get reduced by "resistance"?
[11:13] <@Shik> Fasader: they work like regular armor iirc
[11:13] <@Shik> so yeah
[11:13] <@Fasader> no they don't
[11:13] <@Fasader> 33p and 33c did the same damage
[11:13] <@Shik> it gets reduced by resistance
[11:14] <@Shik> sans the damage type
[11:14] <@Shik> damage type doesn't matter
[11:14] <@Fasader> then it's obviously not the same. :x

[11:14] <@Fasader> I don't even know how regular armor works
[11:15] <@Unreal> i see everyone crying about side sword


 [04:10] <Astinus> but still I think that a weapon able to oneshot you from distance without headshot are quite unba
[04:10] <Astinus> *is
[04:10] == Astinus was kicked from #mount&blade-crpg by Fasader [ONE CLICK KICKED]
[04:10] == Astinus [~chatzilla@93-45-116-13.ip102.fastwebnet.it] has joined #mount&blade-crpg
[04:10] <@Fasader> oh wait I needed two klicks
[04:10] <@Fasader> but it looked like 1 click to you didn't it?
[04:10] <@Fasader> because YOU CANNOT COUNT

Not only does he not know the game mechanics properly, he's also an asshole. Wonderful.



As for the language part, I'm not english either so I don't see your point, there's no reason to suck at english so bad unless you're stupid.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on February 28, 2011, 02:17:43 am


As for the language part, I'm not english either so I don't see your point, there's no reason to suck at english so bad unless you're stupid.

Theres no reason to discuss if ur retarded...yh ur right im talking about u :)
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Patricia on February 28, 2011, 02:18:57 am
Nice argument, I applaud you for your undeniable intelligence.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: UrLukur on February 28, 2011, 04:49:17 pm
I'm sorry, but you've got absolutely no clue of what you're talking about. You know that a spiked club (1H) can one-hit a guy without a helmet, while it will bounce or deal carp damage on anyone with 20 head armor or more? Roughly.

Great, it protect against peasant 1h weapons :rolleyes: Gurni, use some real weapon as examples, add in heirlooming, and count how many times helmet saved you from death (against 30. lvl player).

Get real.

@Mte: go on the battle server, take some helmet, and count how many times it saved you from death. Then check how many times you paid for repair.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Mtemtko on February 28, 2011, 04:53:37 pm
Great, it protect against peasant 1h weapons :rolleyes: Gurni, use some real weapon as examples, add in heirlooming, and count how many times helmet saved you from death (against 30. lvl player).

Get real.

@Mte: go on the battle server, take some helmet, and count how many times it saved you from death. Then check how many times you paid for repair.

Just played for 80 minutes with vaegir war mask on my 2h char , made 13k gold in that time with 43k worth of gear (i won 85% of the time tho), it saved me alot and i dont mind the extra upkeep since i even take the plated boots ( those are hit rarely if youre not cav) i was even hit by a khergit bow in the head, survived with 70% hp, would have taken me to 20%-30% if i wasnt using it,and it saved me alot in melee, took a guy with longsword 3 hits to neck/head to take me down, would have died in the first swing without the helm, so its not that useless.¸
PS: No wonder why youre saying that helmets are useless in melee... you are using an open face helmet  :lol:
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Gurnisson on February 28, 2011, 05:01:22 pm
Got to admit it, I automatically think native when it comes to warband as a game. In native, I prioritize helmet over body armor much of the time, but when it comes to crpg, you may have a point. Helmets may not be as important as they're in native, but they still save you a bunch of times. I've survived backraping overheads because of helmets, countless of slashes over my face, and you know what else? Those people with high-tier helmets who survives a headshot  from a few yards with a well made sniper xbow + steel bolts (160 wpf), really pisses me off.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 28, 2011, 05:37:10 pm
To be fair, it may have been a STR build with even IF. You can get about 85 health if you really want to and still have a viable melee ogre.
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: MrShovelFace on March 01, 2011, 11:32:41 pm
Great, it protect against peasant 1h weapons :rolleyes: Gurni, use some real weapon as examples, add in heirlooming, and count how many times helmet saved you from death (against 30. lvl player).

Get real.

@Mte: go on the battle server, take some helmet, and count how many times it saved you from death. Then check how many times you paid for repair.

I do not know at all what you two are talking about but my morion has saved me from everything ranging from heavy xbows to arrows, to throwing axes. You WILL die in one hit from anything save a wooden weapon without a helmet. Having a good helm means you can survive two shots from most weapons (certain piercing and blunt weapons aside)

do your research first before blamming
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: ShinySpoons on March 03, 2011, 02:47:43 am
^ Not sure where the helmet posts have come from, but if I see someone with heavy body armour but no head armour they've just wasted the repair bill on that armour. As shovel said, one headshot from nearly every weapon will kill you.

And since arrows do cut dmg now helmets are even more useful, no more x3 bonus from the pierce. My 40-50 armour helmet wearing chars frequently survive 2-5 arrows depending on the archers pd. Is this "bad" and mean archer dmg should be buffed again? Imo, no. Realism wise, it makes sense for arrows to glance off helmets, gameplay wise getting oneshot while in armour isn't very fun (unless they're throwing lances...they're always fun  :D)
Title: Re: Archery
Post by: Wulzzz on March 03, 2011, 01:44:23 pm
lol the helmets..
They are definately worth wearing.
How often i shot someone directly in the face causing a huge blood burst and that guy was just like WTF but still kept living.