Author Topic: Spam wise, patch failed  (Read 6516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #45 on: January 14, 2011, 04:49:28 pm »
0
Today, I was on EU_cRPG4. There was a dude called Duke_something or Something_Duke. He spammed. He never blocked, just took the hits and continued to spam. I killed him every time. The sad thing is, he didn't adapt or even try anything, he ran up towards an opponent and started the spam. His K:D was good. Not top of the list, but top10. Although I killed him every time, he always came back and tried the same spam on me. It was boring. Yet, for him, it was enough to be good in this game, because most other players were afraid of his spam, and died.

Now, if he had been higher level than me, as was the case with many of his victims, I would probably not have had a chance against his cooking skills.

I don't want the computer telling me when i can attack and when i can't!!!  I like to attack using my mouse when and where i want. Go play an easier game if you can't figure out how to beat someone who attacks the same way over and over again and doesn't block.
The computer wouldn't tell you when you can attack, you'd be free to attack anytime, but with high fatigue, your swings would be slow.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2011, 04:52:03 pm by zagibu »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?

Offline Konrax

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 281
  • Infamy: 107
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Konrax of Chaos
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #46 on: January 14, 2011, 06:55:39 pm »
0
Every time I fight Lubu if he hits me once I am stunned long enough for him to hit me a second time.

Are you supposed to be able to swing a great axe so fast you can hit them again before the stun wears off?

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #47 on: January 14, 2011, 08:40:41 pm »
0
Every time I fight Lubu if he hits me once I am stunned long enough for him to hit me a second time.

Are you supposed to be able to swing a great axe so fast you can hit them again before the stun wears off?

I have noticed  alot of great axe spammers and especially poleaxes (which didnt seem to have their speed nerfed unlike katana, scimitars, mauls, etc.)  You block their first swing and try to swing back and they already are hitting you with their 2nd swing before you can get a hit back.  That kind of spamming seems too fast as all you can do is block and hope you can circle around them and hit them well they whiff the air.  And if you were wondering I was usually using a bastard or long sword which are pretty fast weapons to begin with.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 547
  • Infamy: 1753
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #48 on: January 14, 2011, 08:53:18 pm »
0
What Kesh said.

Offline _JoG_

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 20
  • Infamy: 9
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Swordsman for hire
  • Game nicks: Givi
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #49 on: January 14, 2011, 09:43:50 pm »
0
I have noticed  alot of great axe spammers and especially poleaxes (which didnt seem to have their speed nerfed unlike katana, scimitars, mauls, etc.)  You block their first swing and try to swing back and they already are hitting you with their 2nd swing before you can get a hit back.  That kind of spamming seems too fast as all you can do is block and hope you can circle around them and hit them well they whiff the air.  And if you were wondering I was usually using a bastard or long sword which are pretty fast weapons to begin with.
That's not spam, they just make use of the stun effect. I also use a bastard sword on a regular basis, yet sometimes I need to block two hits with a heavier weapon before making my own swing.

There are some other tricks for making your swings appear faster. Combined with stun, this could be the reason for the "spam" effect.

Offline ShinySpoons

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 143
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: RS
  • Game nicks: AltOfSpoons
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #50 on: January 14, 2011, 09:48:27 pm »
0
The only weapon(s) truly spammable imo is the war spear and maybe some of the staffs. Reason being, with highish agi and prof a slash and stab combo is sometimes unblockable. There is like an extra long stun sometimes. This is countered by the fact the spear swing whiffs alot.

Offline Boss_Awesome

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 338
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
  • I am the Kwisatz Haderach
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Fallen Brigade (Not the Coalition)
  • Game nicks: Boss_Awesome
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #51 on: January 15, 2011, 12:29:11 am »
0
Spam happens because you don't attack back, have a faulty build or just plain suck.

Pretty much...  The people who usually whine about spamming are generally new players.

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #52 on: January 15, 2011, 12:32:01 am »
0
Pretty much...  The people who usually whine about spamming are generally new players.

The people who usually don't whine about spammers are the spammers themselves.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?

Offline ManOfWar

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 243
  • Infamy: 36
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • No crutches at all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Remnants
  • Game nicks: Remnant_ManOfWar (Formerly Takeda)
  • IRC nick: ManOfWar
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #53 on: January 15, 2011, 12:39:26 am »
0
Fuck you, I'm offended.  :cry:

wait what?
Just a soldier

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #54 on: January 15, 2011, 12:53:40 am »
0
The people who usually don't whine about spammers are the spammers themselves.

The idea that people arent whining about spammers because they PWN spammers is a foreign concept isn't it?
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #55 on: January 15, 2011, 12:57:26 am »
0
wait what?

Was insinuating that when we fight you spam me.  :P
Keep up man.   :mrgreen:
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline ManOfWar

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 243
  • Infamy: 36
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • No crutches at all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Remnants
  • Game nicks: Remnant_ManOfWar (Formerly Takeda)
  • IRC nick: ManOfWar
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #56 on: January 15, 2011, 01:09:15 am »
0
O Gorath, I do not spam you! I merely rapidly press the left like im on crack
Just a soldier

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #57 on: January 15, 2011, 01:31:41 am »
0
O Gorath, I do not spam you! I merely rapidly press the left like im on crack

lol
It's your damn feinting speed that gets me.  Seems like my feints are telegraphed and easily countered by most competent players, while some peoples (yours, balbs, a few others) hardly seem like feints more than a random "twitch" in the attack animation at a random moment.
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Kalam

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 697
  • Infamy: 163
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Never do an enemy a small injury.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Linebreakers
  • Game nicks: Cavalieres_Midnighter, Dunsparrow
  • IRC nick: Kalam
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #58 on: January 15, 2011, 02:04:11 am »
0
That's not spam, they just make use of the stun effect. I also use a bastard sword on a regular basis, yet sometimes I need to block two hits with a heavier weapon before making my own swing.

There are some other tricks for making your swings appear faster. Combined with stun, this could be the reason for the "spam" effect.

Don't forget reach! The only sure way I've found to combat these things with shorter weapons is to block multiple times and only counter-attack when an opportunity presents itself. Which I sometimes don't do when I get impatient...which, during battle, is always.

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Spam wise, patch failed
« Reply #59 on: January 15, 2011, 03:15:23 am »
0
The idea that people arent whining about spammers because they PWN spammers is a foreign concept isn't it?

Not really, it's what I'm doing. I, personally, have no problem with spammers. But don't you think there is something wrong if you can get to the top of the scoreboard by only spamming right to left slash?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?