If all the horses were to cost the same upkeep, I'd probably take the charger myself most of the time simply to be able to take more arrows before going down. But I'm not a very typical cavalry player. My goal isn't to get solo kills, but rather to do what I think tactically helps the team. So I'll prance around with infantry, forcing the enemy infantry to look at me while they are trying to fight other infantry or else be stabbed and bumped. Or I'll go behind or off to the side of archers to force them to keep shooting at me, and then approach them whenever they ignore me.
With a light horse, I have to be extra cautious, practically hiding away from the enemy archers, either searching for a safe place to fight or picking a good moment to dart in and be effective before the archers and infantry are aware I'm there. With a heavy horse, I can act more like a very mobile version of infantry.
Actually it's all the opposite of what you said.
With Courser or even Sumpter you're more a mobile infantry because you're faster, and even if your horse gets killed you're - well - infantry, as long as you recover from the fall.
With Charger, you're neither cavalry nor infantry. You're not mobile infantry because you don't dismount, since that's the entire point of having a charger - to stay on a horse as long as possible. You're not cavalry either - cavalry kills you, horse archers kill you, and you kill no one as you said - you're just sightseeing around.
About usefulness of distracting infantry.. that's certainly good, but often you can distract infantry with any other horse as well. And while you're doing nothing but sometimes distracting, that Courser teammate of yours can kill 5 people easily and distract while he's riding by everyone real fast.
My point here is that no one can actually show how Charger is good, and intangibles such as "distractions" just don't cut it. You're using 70k+ worth equipment for distractions, that just doesn't pay off. If Charger cost the same money as Courser I'd still take Courser.
I meant pre-upkeep patch - the horses now are about as fast as horses then were, since we all have 6 riding skill nowdays
Well doesn't that mean you invest more skill points to be faster? If I understood you.
HOWEVER. On more tightly-spaced maps I find my butt getting fisted by the few players who use chargers. I simply can't contend with them, since my speed and maneuvering don't count for shit in a tiny space. As Lady Gaga says: bump-slash is your friend.
I'd still love to see that. I observed some chargers today and same results as before. LadyGaga had a crossbow and some cheap horse when I went to US server.
The thing with tightly maps is - are you going to use charger there? You *might* get better results in village map from a charger, but would you get better results than from Sarranid, or by going on foot entirely? Sure you might bump in a village, theoretically speaking, but if you try it yourself you'll see that soloing gets you piked, and team-supporting means you cant bump anyone because you'll probably end up bumping your teammate as well or just him with huge hitbox horse.
So I'm merely asking - where can I see this usefulness of a charger? I see usefulness of throwing every round, of coursers/sarranids, of archers, 2H, polearms, you name it. With some players I can see 1Hshield works for them. I see naked people scoring well and doing well. But charger? Where? There are people with 200,000+ gold, it's not that they dont have money. But no one takes charger and those who do, do average at best and can in no way compete with Courser.