It wouldn't. It would just still be safer than their original countries - which aren't multiculturate.
hello i would just like to note that especially in the case of Afghanistan, that country IS multi-cultural. you've got about 30-35 percent of the population in "Pashtunistan" in the south of the country; these people largely make up the Taliban and other militant groups of that nature. you've got an oodle of minorities there in the north termed the Northern Alliance (lol) made up of Uzbeks, Tajiks, et al making up about 25 percent or so. then you've got the rest that are smaller tribes and relatively unaffiliated groups. some Arab and others different.
and what do you know, the Northern Alliance (with lovely NATO assistance) is involved lock stock n' barrel in institutionalized child rape and slavery, general barbarism like razing villages and murdering folk, stealing, racketeering, et al with the Taliban. of course the Taliban in return are quite brutal in response including suicide bombers and the like. at least they generally hang/stone kiddie-diddlers.
the US has been funding Hekmatyr, the worst of the northern warlords for decades and funnily enough now he's trying to get his ass into "legitimate" Afghani politics.
i can't lecture you as well on the other nations you mentioned because i am not as well informed but i am confident enough to say that the same sort of situation is there, but with less *overt* NATO intervention. and yeah, even without NATO intervention, these folk would be slaughtering one another because GUESS WHAT folk that practice Islam and are a similar shade of brown are just as willing to rape and murder one another as the Krauts and the Russians in WW2.
also the largest purveyor of suffering in the world is the United States Federal Government, coercive government is inherently immoral and no the selective service act is NOT fucking consent.
t. secessionist-anarcho-spergalist
