Exactly, it's a state tool over there but not over here. Again, Islamophobia is regarding the religion and not the state or the culture.
If you want to say people from violent and oppressive countries have a high chance of being violent and oppressive? Sure, who could argue. You may also find, contrary to forum hysteria about censorship, that you are very unlikely to ever be censored for expressing that view. These are fucked up parts of the world, and at this point it's abundantly clear that left to their own devices they will remain this way and continue to spawn threats to the lives of individual westerners. A generation's going to need to take the hit and globalise the shit out of them (unless we enjoy having that crap on our doorstep for all foreseeable future generations, and by 'globalise' i really mean 'westernise') and sucks for us, it happens to be our generation that's doing it. The fun part is for all our 'soft' and 'liberal' rhetoric we are fairly brazenly attempting to destroy their way of life socially (just not their religion), the best thing is there really isnt anything they can do to stop it.
But you want to say that Islam is inherently incompatible with the west (based only on projection and speculation from carefully-selected radical examples), that there is no scenario in which western culture and Islam can exist at the same time within the same person, and that the whole religion (and every individual that encompasses) is not welcome or that the prospect of any natives converting to that religion poses an existential threat to western values of tolerance, that's Islamophobia and that's what will get you censored.
The hysteria about, 'no islamophobia? That means I cant criticise beheadings?' is ridiculous. Any time I've seen someone state that they've been censored for criticising terrorism, and actually share what they posted, it's always 'Lul, muslims all retarded, go back to own country, no re'. It's straight-up the kid running to an adult saying another kid hit them 'for no reaaaason!'. Am I saying noone ever got censored for a dumb reason? No. If a single ideology or political leaning somehow achieved perfection in this way that would be weird and creepy, instead you have a load of different sites run by a load of different people with their own arbitrary sense of what is and is not acceptable. But as a rule of thumb if you want to criticise terrorism and argue with the same intelligence you would irl then you will never get censored.
Islam is a state funded oligarchy, all you have to do is follow the money and political power, all these mosques are foreign funded. It wasn't long ago Cavaliers and Roundheads were spiking heads on Tower Hill over the same power struggle. The issues run much deeper than just the radicals, when you cut the head off the snake another one takes it's place, because it's more than a religion, just like the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of England were more than just a religion 100's of years ago.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/29/french-pm-manuel-valls-considers-ban-on-foreign-funded-mosqueshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/to-curb-radicalism-france-targets-foreign-funding-for-mosques/2016/08/14/788ec7e6-5ef9-11e6-84c1-6d27287896b5_story.html?utm_term=.99d3af8bd013Even if foreign funding is stopped, which is almost impossible because these Mosques are under accordance of the same laws that protect the private donations Western Churches depend on, there is bound to be a very severe backlash and hateful resentment of westerners meddling in their religious affairs. If you think Muslim oligarchs are ignorant of Western Laws to abuse and cover up their intents you are very naive, Sadiq Khan is an example of the "liberal" frontmen they use to deceive your system of justice.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3544846/With-friends-like-Sadiq-Khan-fit-run-London-Labour-MP-s-dealings-Islamic-extremists-raise-doubts-suitability-London-s-mayor.htmlWhen you follow the money back to the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, and the Saudi Royalty what do you find? A bunch of decadents who look like cavemen driving around in head scarfs and robes in Ferraris and Lamborghinis.
The hypocrisy that is frequently mentioned is that it was acceptable for Englishmen to chop heads off and kill hundreds of thousands of people in the name of god in the 1400-1600's, today this is not acceptable and governments will back their corrupt hierarchies/monarchies in favor of stabilization. English Colonists from the 1600's ( Massachusetts Bay Colony) who went to aid Cromwell and Parliament would have had much more in common with modern Islamic Jihadists than they would with the modern Englishmen or American. However there's no denying we would not be the 1st world modern Civilization we are today without these kind of barbaric and violent struggles and religious wars.
But the questions we should be asking is, why should we tolerate people who are much more or just as ignorant as our ancestors were 400-600 years ago, and put their backwards institutions on the same pedestal as our own reformed and tamed ones? Are these liberal Muslim ass kissers really pushing to reform them, or are they just undermining our own freedom that your people earned through 100's of years of struggle? Is is worth sacrificing the life of your fellow countrymen to terrorist attacks so foreigners can take their place in your society?
Even Buddhists are now violently attacking and killing Muslims to drive them out of their countries, if it gets to the point where Buddhists want to exterminate you then there is a serious problem.
visitors can't see pics , please
register or
login
