... I was just told that if I don't like the way admins handle their business I'm free to walk.
The ban prior to this one was withdrawn because the decision making ability of Austriano was found to be unreasonable, but that fact was completely ignored by both Uther and Rico, whom continuously bring up my ban record, of which the vast majority are more than two years old.
That's what I mean by ZEALOTRY.
Fucking reptiles.
No Bjord, that's called being consistent. If we wouldn't take the ban history into account, it would be, to put it lightly, dumb.
I probably shouldnt keep posting this stuff, but honestly, the whole essay ban is dumb kiddy shit. its what pretentious douchebag parents do "what did you do? why did you do that?... mommy told you not to do that so why would you do that?"
quit making the fucking kid say why he did it and just punish em already, its dumb kiddy shit.
If people felt bad about the shit they got banned for they would jump on and apologize and plenty have...but to demand it? for what? so you can A: have the satisfaction in knowing you broke him into pretending to apologize or B: to get people to write a bunch of BS for your amusement.
lets get real, no matter how many times someone breaks the rules they eventually get to come back...so just give him his couple months or w.e. and quit poking at him for your own amusement, and do away with the whole gayass essay ban shit, its disgustingly degrading you would bring such a shitty lame ass irl practice into our virtual world, i game to get away from politically correct bullshit like this. because it is just that PC bullshit man, ooooh he broke the rules, lets make him grovel to play again. him writing an essay changes nothing, it simply gives people a show. smoke and mirrors they do the same lame shit in politic...dont do it here ffs.
Fucking Robots Indeed.
Plumbo, we don't give out essays because we enjoy it, we do it because we are giving the banned guy a chance to redeem himself. It's done for the record. If he gets banned 15 times and gets an essay, that should be the sign of a last chance for him - change your ways and stop breaking the rules, and you're fine to go. Write an essay like this one, and it's clear what will happen. Trust me, it's rarely a pleasure to ban someone permanently, but there must be a line.
lol you only get essay/permabanned if admins have a personal dislike of you.
Havelle, go back to your land of memes and gobblins
Regarding the essay:
You completely missed the topic and instead of owning up to your misdeeds, you talked shit and pointed fingers at the others, which is almost completely the opposite of what I asked of you. We chatted before you wrote it, and we talked both about your bans and how some admins tend to be a bit too harsh, but you apparently only cared about the admin part, which makes me sad.
It's not a matter of whether you're a griefer or a chat abuser, if you pile up enough bans, you will always meet the same fate. That is how it works, just and equal treatment. Dislike or like has no part in this, the essay was discussed and after our talk, I made it slightly less strict, yet still you admitted to not changing your ways and instead you said "It's their fault, they're too strict!" - This is not how any of it works.
Instead you turned your essay into some defence argument, which was pointless.
At the time of writing this reply, 38 (57.6%) of votes in the poll rated your essay below average, majority of them 1/5.
Just for the record, let me sum up your ban history here:
21.05.2012 - 5 hour ban for other reasons.
07.06.2012 - 2 day ban for teamwounding, unbanned earlier (after ~2 hours).
15.06.2012 - 5 hour ban for insulting (Kinngrimm case).
18.06.2012 - 1 hour ban for other reasons, shortened to 1 minute.
Plenty of warnings, you would've thought it would help him learn to follow the rules.
05.10.2012 - Essay ban for griefing and harrasment, unbanned 11 days later.
[Here were 2 overrulled short bans for harassment, 3rd one being final]
[1,2] 14.01.2013 - First 2 bans, different hours, for 12 hours and 12 months, both overruled shortly after being set.
[3] 15.01.2013 -
10 month ban due to last one being essay, unbanned on 07.07.2013
And now, recent history.
10.11.2015 - 3 day ban for teamkilling
link18.11.2015 - 1 hour ban for teamkilling
21.11.2015 - 2 day ban for exploiting
link20.02.2016 - 1 hour ban for teamkilling
22.02.2016 - 1 day ban for teamkilling, unbanned after 3 hours due to appeal. (The Austriano ban)
And the current ban, from 27.02.2016.
Here is our chat we had a few days ago, I hope you don't mind me posting it - nothing incriminating, just my perspective and arguments from both sides:
1 and
2So there are two truths that can be said in the end here.
You need a long time to learn apparently.
Which is why you will remain banned for approximately 3 months. I'll try and remember to unban you in time.
And if you screw up again after that... Well, next true thing - putting up another ban is only a matter of seconds
Edit: fixed beloved to below, otherwise I'd be charged for favouritism