What is propagandistic about it?
The article is basically a shitlist of right-wing politicians that illustrates why each of them is bad.
I don't know the biography of each one, I'm no expert on what they did and I can't tell whether the stuff written in the article is well-researched and coming to an unbiased conclusion or not. That's why I don't allow myself to judge it. I don't know if it's propagandistic or not.
But if it's not
propagandistic, what else could it be? The only thing that comes to mind is
redundant. An article with the conclusion "biased, extremist right-wing politicians are bad" is not exactly worth reading.
That's what I hate about politics. You need to spend several dozens of hours to research your own opinion, the alternatives are usually equally disappointing, and your vote is pooled with several million others, who either didn't inform themselves as much as you did, or wasted an equal amount of time so they can
not make a difference.