France under attack....

[Leshma]

nah I'm an irish Pollock but do you want it to stop?

disclaimer this is just the opinion of a drunken idiot

I'm asking because muslims are biggest proponents of lex talionis in 21st century. Closely followed by jews, but since many of them are secular only their government sticks to that rule. Your own government tried it couple of times, only made things worse...

Germans were also big into it during WWII, expect it wasn't eye for an eye. More like an eye for 100 foreign eyes.

It just doesn't work because you can't reason with madmen, not even if you attempt their logic. It always, and I'm mean always, spirals out and never stops.

[Xant]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-california-idUSKCN0PV21020150721

All purchased legally, didn't raise any flags, ATF didn't even bother with him, LA must be the safest place on earth.

LOL, this fucking story again. Retards thinking someone owning 1200 guns is more dangerous than them owning a 1 gun. Protip, you can only shoot 1 at a time, the 1199 other guns don't increase the danger level in the slightest. In fact, someone owning that many just means they're a collector, not someone who's out to buy a tool for their human-killing, so someone like that is actually much safer than someone with 1 gun.

[Falka]

women do not get raped,

             

PS. 70 people dies killed by muslim terrorist and we've got barely a dozen of posts... How more dead this forum could be?

[Paul]

He meant there are only rightful rapes by proud Polish men which count as cultural care.

[Xant]

70 people dies killed by muslim terrorist

is just a prank bro

[Lt_Anders]

           

PS. 70 people dies killed by muslim terrorist and we've got barely a dozen of posts... How more dead this forum could be?

I've read it's 80 now.

[the real god emperor]

     
PS. 70 people dies killed by muslim terrorist and we've got barely a dozen of posts... How more dead this forum could be?

At fifteen, I had the will to  learn ; at thirty, I could stand ; at forty, I had no  doubts ; at fifty, I understood the heavenly Bidding ;  at sixty, my ears were opened ; at seventy, I could  do as my heart lusted without trespassing from the  square.

[Prpavi]

LOL, this fucking story again. Retards thinking someone owning 1200 guns is more dangerous than them owning a 1 gun. Protip, you can only shoot 1 at a time, the 1199 other guns don't increase the danger level in the slightest. In fact, someone owning that many just means they're a collector, not someone who's out to buy a tool for their human-killing, so someone like that is actually much safer than someone with 1 gun.

Yes a gun collector with 6.5 tons of ammo, must be for firing range, checks out.

[Christo]

Come on, he could carry a couple magazines at best. Definitely not two tons.

Explosives on the other hand would be scary.

[Prpavi]

It's not about "one guy", it's about what you can legally own in the states, this is just an example of how retarded the law is, imagine he was a vet who went mad and got his few pals together so shoot those lovely snipers at cops, oh wait...

[Falka]

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

but what else they can do.

[LordBerenger]

           

PS. 70 people dies killed by muslim terrorist and we've got barely a dozen of posts... How more dead this forum could be?

That's what happens when they remove ladders from game, implement upkeep, nerf every weapons. QQ

[Rhekimos]

ISIS have lost a lot of ground this year so far. But it's slow. I guess because they have so many supporters and are quite well organised/equipped.

It's the sheer fanaticism of the death cult of ISIS and the extreme difficulty in telling them apart from everybody else in there. They don't sleep in a barracks that is easy to target if they can avoid it, instead they murder a family, preferably a Christian one, and place their fighters in that legit looking home.

How much the people in there support ISIS is difficult to tell. The escaped tell that it's not a pleasant environment.


visitors can't see pics , please register or login

How do you even fight this kind of war? We don't want to bomb schools and hospitals.

A relative killed won't buy you much goodwill.

[Leshma]

They could back Assad instead of rebels. There would be civil casualties, blatant disregard of international laws, all kinds of nasty shit. But majority of Syrians would stay in Syria and ISIL would be probably be a lot weaker. History shows that Soviet controlled middle east is mostly peaceful (at expense of civil liberties and what not) and that American influence in there created mayhem and havoc.

Of course, this has nothing to do with people and their well being. It is all about resource control, like in every decent RTS

[Turkhammer]

They could back Assad instead of rebels. There would be civil casualties, blatant disregard of international laws, all kinds of nasty shit. But majority of Syrians would stay in Syria and ISIL would be probably be a lot weaker. History shows that Soviet controlled middle east is mostly peaceful (at expense of civil liberties and what not) and that American influence in there created mayhem and havoc.

Of course, this has nothing to do with people and their well being. It is all about resource control, like in every decent RTS

The Russians have never controlled the ME so that puts the lie to that ridiculous statement.  Large segments of the Syrian population wanted Assad to leave and to have a liberalized government and open elections during the "Arab Spring".  Assad's murderous reaction is what has caused the Syrian disaster.  Russian and Iranian support for Assad has only perpetuated the situation.  Most of the havoc and mayhem there has been caused by Shia and Sunni hatred.