btw Generals Ulysses S Grant and William T Sherman both owned slaves as well
I'm afraid that's a negative. You can say that "Ulysses S. Grant owned slaves" but it's still disingenuous. To the best of my knowledge the only written record implying that Grant legally owned a slave is the receipt of sorts that Grant wrote setting him free. While living with his father-in-law in Missouri Grant did work with slaves, but didn't own them. Even during the war when his wife was given a number of slaves by her father to take care of the house and such they were still owned by Frederick Dent, not Grant, who was obviously fighting.
You have me stumped with the Cump accusation though, never have heard of him having any slaves. I know he was sympathetic to the institution, but I'm not sure under what circumstances he would have come into ownership of a slave considering he was born and raised in a free State, and after that was in military and business fields at various points until the war (rather than Southern agriculture).
As for statues and the like I never really cared for any monuments to democrats. If a town or county or whatever kind of locality has such a statue and doesn't know what to do with it then they should hold a referendum deciding its fate. If the residents of that place want it down by all means bring it down without any pomp or fanfare. Put it in a museum or sell it or something, I'm sure someone wants it. Hell, if someone wants to erect on their lawn a statue of a failed general only hailed because George B. McClellen was that much more of a mongoloid, that's fine by me.
Honestly democrats crying about losing an election in 1860 is no different from them crying about losing an election in 2016 to me. Although in 1860 they were armed and weren't pussies so they actually seceded from the Union instead of just waving dildos around. I mean, I think the institution of slavery is inherently wrong, unchristian, and contrary to the natural rights of man which make up the foundation of our nation (yes, the three-fifths compromise was a devil's bargain, very sad but necessary to start the American experiment, just like the Civil War was necessary to fix it). I'm certainly just as opposed to the cultural Marxism and degradation of civic society that the woe-begotten democrats of today are trying to maintain and propagate.
I just don't see the difference ay lmao. Confeder
ates were traitors. Lose election -> fear for muh free labor -> secede preemptively, was the sequence of events. I mean, who's the real nigg
er in that scenario? It's much better than dildos but that's still some pretty lame beta cuck shit.
Oh, and I hate tariffs too don't get me wrong, I'm all for free trade. That's why I also think Lincoln was a queer. Gotta maintain that Union though my dude, Sherman did nothing wrong.
Poll