Fallout 4

[darmaster]

Yes but oblivion>skyrim remember; as I said in the witcher 3 thread, I won't judge much before the game is out, surely not the gameplay since I haven't seen any bit of it yet, but relying on mods is not always a positive thing as xant said.

[Xant]

Each to their own. But having a discussion on how shit the game will be, when there isn't even any game play of it yet. That's just ignorant and doesn't make sense.

Morrowind; 10/10 Countless awards.
Oblivion; 10/10 Countless awards.
Fallout 1 2 and 3; 10/10 Countless awards.
Skyrim; 10/10 Countless awards.

And now all of a sudden before any game play what so ever, This "looks" like it's gonna be a disappointment. No, not a fucking chance.

I had no idea Bethesda developed Fallout 1 and 2.

Oblivion and Skyrim being 10/10...

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Also, who the fuck's been talking about "how shit the game will be"?

[Thovex]

Once a forum derp, forever a forum derp. rip thred

[Richyy]

You can pre purchase it on steam, no release date.

[722_]

ok so why have all pc games gone from £30 new to £50 new? Fucking ridiculous

[Gravoth_iii]

uhuh, new vegas was made by obsidian and not bethesda.

So? Its not like the strayed far from the concept F3 followed. Highly doubt 4 will be much different from NV and 3, safe is probably the best anyways.

[F i n]

Pretty much everyone? Graphics are an important aspect of games in the year of our lord 2015. Even people who go "pfft, graphics" can usually be seen being super excited when a game does have great graphics. There's no excuse to having shitty graphics for a big studio like Bethesda. And I don't think anyone is saying the game will be ruined because it has shit graphics, it's just one aspect of what makes a game good (and the only one we can see from the trailer.)

I'm more concerned/annoyed about the animations, they gave me instant Fallout 3 flashbacks, super stiff and unbelievable.

That's actually true. After having like 10 big games published - and still not having fixed ANY of the Gameplay issues... that's a bit sad.

Afer all Skyrim = Morrowind when it comes to combat-animation (except for some fancy slowmo-finishers that no one actually needs...).

Great athmo though, and nice graphics as well. But i really missed the depth of games like Mass effect / Witcher. Some actual Story - not just a big sandbox with an overpowered, yet silent & pale hero.


God damn it - if only cd-project would make all games...

[Vibe]

I thought Skyrim was average, even back then when it was all fresh and shiny. Comparing it to Witcher 3 now, it's worlds below. Bethesda is going to have to give it their best if they want to compete with Witcher 3.

[Teeth]

Yeah, I gotta say that the Witcher 3 demonstrated the level of detail that can be done in an open world RPG, creating a living world with convincing characters throughout, extensive voice-acting, good cutscenes and side quests with proper storylines that are far more interesting than the fetch quests that are often in Bethesda games. I loved Fallout 3, but this was for a big part because of the very charming setting of Fallout. It is 2015 now and the Witcher 3 demonstrated to me that games have come a long way. Fallout needs a big step up, Fallout 3.5 won't do.

This trailer does not show any gameplay, it hints at some features perhaps, but the main reveal is graphics and the setting. It is perfectly possible and fair to judge that the graphics look rather underwhelming at this stage, don't have to go all defensive immediately.

[Clockworkkiller]

Lol Beth ain't need to do shit. Fanboys gonna fanboy.

Besides that I must be the only one here who enjoys the vanilla elder scrolls games.

[722_]

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[//saxon]

I had no idea Bethesda developed Fallout 1 and 2.

I didn't say Fallout 1 and 2 was made by Bethesda you half a pasty..

They were both great games, Bethesda obviously took over and made Fallout 3 and didn't fail the series and they did take the risk of changing the whole series into a totally new genre.

Even mentioning graphics on an RPG game announcement trailer is laughable. I'm no way near a hardcore gamer what so ever, i'm as close to a casual as you will ever get but i know that graphics in a Fallout game is like putting Chocolate Sauce and fucking sprinkles on Chocolate ice cream. It's not fucking needed. Then you get the virgins saying "well if witcher 3 can have good graphics then so can everything else"

Listen.

(click to show/hide)

Skip to 1:22..

[Mr_Oujamaflip]

Its hard to say what the graphics will be at the final state, when it just got announced, and i dont really give a shit about the pixels anyways. It could take a step back in graphics for all i care, as long as it makes up for it in gameplay. New vegas was an alright game overall, and this should probably land on the same. Untill they actually improve gameplay i wont be too amazed with these games. Witcher 3 seems to be taking a step forward as far as gameplay goes, need to pick it up soon but apparently even it falls short later on when you get some levels, and difficulty shatters.

Witcher 3 took a step forward with gameplay?

[Xant]

I didn't say Fallout 1 and 2 was made by Bethesda you half a pasty..

They were both great games, Bethesda obviously took over and made Fallout 3 and didn't fail the series and they did take the risk of changing the whole series into a totally new genre.

Even mentioning graphics on an RPG game announcement trailer is laughable. I'm no way near a hardcore gamer what so ever, i'm as close to a casual as you will ever get but i know that graphics in a Fallout game is like putting Chocolate Sauce and fucking sprinkles on Chocolate ice cream. It's not fucking needed. Then you get the virgins saying "well if witcher 3 can have good graphics then so can everything else"

Why would you list F1 and 2 then? Made by a different studio, completely irrelevant how good they were or weren't.

Bethesda changed the series because they already had the framework ready from Oblivion. F3 was good but not as good as the earlier Fallouts.

Go play some text-based MUDs then if you don't care about graphics. What's that, you won't? Oh, what a surprise.

Exploration is one of the best aspects about Bethesda games and good graphics make it a lot more fun while bad graphics take away from it.

[[ptx]]