Rogue Millitants within the WotN

[StonedSteel]

Thx man, although i have to admit, i am a bit confused about your post above.

"something i do not need to say to you, is play nice"
^
"but please don't gank"
"please balance the rosters"

like i said in my other post, the rosters will probably stay as they are, as this isnt a new war, its just the one we have all put on hold?
you already know im fond of you brygg but i gotta admit im a bit confused. you seem like a lad that enjoys the war aspect as much as the rp one, have made posts similar to mine about fighting friends in other games like risk, i had thought you shared my "may the best faction win" mentality, so your recent posts have me a bit confused. asking for drama-less battles is asking for XP battles.

and xp battles it really doesnt matter what the rosters are...i dont think we are having xp battles, i think we are having strat battles, made up by strat factions, and some factions and their friends, are just better then others. this will always be the case.

so to ask for even rosters...idk man, i like playing with my friends, my friends are fairly good? i dont see that as unfair, my friends play alot, practice alot. besides, you lads have more active players then us, and if you can get Miley OR allers on any of your rosters, prob the two most consistent strat players? id say its fair.

we should talk btw. ( you are the leader ya? either way, james mentioned i should deal with you instead ) for me, setting up battle times to make sure both sides can get people on, seemed along the lines of setting up an xp battle, its a funny idea, letting your opponent know when and where you will strike...but i suppose we should talk, i think the community in general is getting sick of plate vs peasants, would be nice to strike a fief that has gear and a fighting chance.

[Bryggan]

When i plead to balance the rosters, I mean the neutrals.  By which i mean the people who don't really hate either of us.  And no, Allers and Miley consistently fight against us, being owned by Dutchy.  i know, I know, Allers used to be 13k, and I let his caravan escape when I was merced to the Squids (essentially breaking my contract); but I never expect people to act honourably when there is gold involved.

But, yes Plumbo, I've read your posts, an agree with most of them.  If you know my history you know I;ll fight anybody at any time at any moment.  Though I prefer prime time. The things I hate in this game is brocoding and unbalanced battles.  I swear, my side has always been more cheerful geting ganked than they have ganking.  A final last stand is more invigorating than punch the last peasant to death.  And, while we're swearing, i swear we have not had a negative feeling in our rosters unless we ganked or were ganked.

Gankings suck.

So, as you know, Dutchy rebelled (we gotta get that guy kicked- jimalways end up chatting til my 4 am, which suc, cuz I get up at 6, and Jimmy betrayed.  Which obviosuly hurt us

[Thalion_Menelvagor]

So, I just saw this thread today. Guess I'm a little behind the loop. That explains where stonedsteel came from at least. I am more caught up on things now. This is actually part of why the decision was made to break up WOTN, as no  offense to Hoc but we prefer not to have random stuff going on in our faction. Some of the other reasons included the fact thathat Mithrim was never intended to be a nice empire builder. So breaking up WOTN will hopefully generate some diversity on a the map.  As well as to allow other players more political freedom in their actions

[StonedSteel]

So, I just saw this thread today. Guess I'm a little behind the loop. That explains where stonedsteel came from at least. I am more caught up on things now. This is actually part of why the decision was made to break up WOTN, as no  offense to Hoc but we prefer not to have random stuff going on in our faction. Some of the other reasons included the fact thathat Mithrim was never intended to be a nice empire builder. So breaking up WOTN will hopefully generate some diversity on a the map.  As well as to allow other players more political freedom in their actions

...

Finnie? that u?

bro. i dont think it will matter one bit that you split or not. mithram will prob remain afk, and 2-3 hoc's will keep 2-3 fiefs at 0 crime...
you wanna split your "empire" due to my actions, go right ahead, but seriously my man, you have been afk forever. idk if u were there that night, but theres not many nights 40+ people are playing crpg NA. it was a good thing. cant remember the last time that many people were in ts for strat.

you dont want random shit happening is understandable...good leaders keep their men in line.
a group of friends with gear noone was using, decided being afk was boring as fuck, and did some random shit...also understandable yes? their leader wasnt afk, and was in the loop.
sorry you didnt know what was going on and now decide to split for not being kept in the loop...sorry lads, deaf ears here nothing, you WERE afk. your lads were afk, your entire faction save for a couple hoc lads, was afk.

it was a good thing. godfrey were afk. were afk the 3 days i had them in my sights. i hit their army the first, and attacked the castle the next night. if you werent afk you would have known what was going on by the second night, everyone was in agree in ts.

and godfreys are still afk, when he showed up for the 2nd battle, i posted that i would give the castle back to the godfreys. they are still afk, and now vyincourd has 1000 pop again. ( fair bit of time of passed )

personally i think you are making a mistake. some random shit happened while you were afk, that A: didnt hurt ur factions rep in anyway and B: ur faction ( ex faction ) profited from big time.

i just wanted to attack someone...decided on acre, jona wrote that "rogue shit", then saw the afk and changed the plans...if HCE can attack afk, then bitches we can too.
they had a lot of gear on their army, but none in their castle...the plan was to keep going after that and attack acre, but non of their fiefs had any armies, i was sick of plate vs peasents, i tried talking to james for a good place and agreeable time to attack acre, but he said i should talk to brygg...and i never did

shit just died...again. who knows, its sooo dead \ boring right now...i imagine someone out there will try to spice things up by doing "random shit" and attacking someone in a afk Wargame. but it wont be me, ive had my fill of na strat...u lads...are doing it all wrong.

[Tristan_of_Erzoth]

When has HCE ever attacked AFKs?

[StonedSteel]

When has HCE ever attacked AFKs?

sins of your allies lol

i dont recall Acre OR 13k attacking afks, i might be wrong...but starks?
if i attack afk's while under wardens...wardens attack afks.
same goes for u lads, and ur people.

[Tristan_of_Erzoth]

sins of your allies lol

i dont recall Acre OR 13k attacking afks, i might be wrong...but starks?
if i attack afk's while under wardens...wardens attack afks.
same goes for u lads, and ur people.

House Stark attacked AFKs as House Stark, not as HCE. We haven't attacked AFK's in a long long while.

[Jona]

Alright, alright, this ain't the place to go mouthing off about past transgressions. This thread is pretty irrelevant now since HoC as a whole is no longer part of the WotN, and thus can be regarded as a bunch of rogues once more, like the good ole days. Thread locked.