I don't understand why you pretend that you don't know what's going on.
On the first page chadz asked, why would devs continue developing the predecessor if M: BG will be better in every single way, especially if continuing work on cRPG might mean M: BG will not get finished.
The answer is they shouldn't develop predecessor, cuz it's illogical and even harmful, and this is obvious, but there was no question of development, only about ruining prevention.
If further development of cRPG is nonsensical for old devs, it's also nonsensical for new devs cuz mod fulfills only functions of waiting area. That's why we should have "last stable version" whatever its means, even rollback.
Say what you want, but after years of prosperity a bit fucked final is not an image-asset, so I understand your hypersensitivity to critique
BTW: My thread about support enjoys great success...