Author Topic: strategus and raid  (Read 1742 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline yasutay

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 58
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player
  • No kings,no rules,only men!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Tormatun
  • Game nicks: Vercngetorix
  • IRC nick: Vercngetorix
strategus and raid
« on: April 05, 2015, 03:44:52 pm »
0
If I choose raid
what I gain?
just items or items and money or just money I dont know what I gain :D
Steam ID: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198026718833/
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mr.K.

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 474
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmar Union
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2015, 04:33:03 pm »
0
You gain the items in the fief, not the money.

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2015, 07:49:31 pm »
+2
Now when I'm thinking about raids it's sounds bad.

"What ? They took our swords and plows, but left the gold  :o :shock: :?: "

I may be wrong, but wasn't it one of the reasons of raids, the opportunity to enrichment ?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline yasutay

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 58
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player
  • No kings,no rules,only men!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Tormatun
  • Game nicks: Vercngetorix
  • IRC nick: Vercngetorix
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2015, 02:28:48 am »
0
Not enough for me.
Why we dont gain money this is so pointless.
Steam ID: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198026718833/
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Gimest

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 101
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Pantheon
  • Game nicks: Gimest_DeGyrst
  • IRC nick: Gimest
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2015, 10:15:20 am »
+2
I just dont get it, at this state of strategus, why the fuck are you all raiding eachother? Would think that at this point, there should be only some battles with decent gear. But no, ppl have to raid and rape some peasants...

I know this was completely off topic, but there was somekinda discussion about raid and had to bring this up, ive been looking battle section sometimes, and those raids just made me wonder.

Offline Tristan_of_Erzoth

  • Game Admin
  • *****
  • Renown: 1000
  • Infamy: 217
  • cRPG Player
  • I dont know
    • View Profile
    • steam id
  • Faction: Calradian Confederacy
  • Game nicks: Tristan_of_Erzoth, Sorcerer_Tholamin, Big_Dick_McCallister
  • IRC nick: wtf is an IRC
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2015, 11:14:21 am »
-3
I just dont get it, at this state of strategus, why the fuck are you all raiding eachother? Would think that at this point, there should be only some battles with decent gear. But no, ppl have to raid and rape some peasants...

I know this was completely off topic, but there was somekinda discussion about raid and had to bring this up, ive been looking battle section sometimes, and those raids just made me wonder.

^^ This. Its basically what I've been saying to my faction for all the wars we've been in. Ruins the game.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://steamcommunity.com/id/evilmagic/

Offline CALAMARI

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 350
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2015, 04:51:09 pm »
+2
^^ This. Its basically what I've been saying to my faction for all the wars we've been in. Ruins the game.

Don't believe this hypocritical sack of shit.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mr.K.

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 474
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmar Union
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2015, 08:47:32 pm »
+2
It's because there's way too many fiefs for the population we currently have and the crime system is a bit broken. If it was changed that capturing a fief with 100% crime would drop it to zero, there would be an incentive to actually attack one. Now even if you take it you can't defend it anyway, so what's the point. That plus the fact that there's more fiefs than players currently means that nobody really needs any fiefs.

There's no real battles because there's no one to fight against and "fun battles" were never actually fun. The reasons for the current state on EU side are quite clear and talked over and over in other topics. Haven't payed much attention to NA but I assume the same thing happened there when the Squids were ganked.

Offline Tristan_of_Erzoth

  • Game Admin
  • *****
  • Renown: 1000
  • Infamy: 217
  • cRPG Player
  • I dont know
    • View Profile
    • steam id
  • Faction: Calradian Confederacy
  • Game nicks: Tristan_of_Erzoth, Sorcerer_Tholamin, Big_Dick_McCallister
  • IRC nick: wtf is an IRC
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2015, 02:39:27 am »
-2
Don't believe this hypocritical sack of shit.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Lol, first off raiding AFK players doesn't count considering no one would've showed up no matter what, I just needed gear so that way I could do stuff as an ACTIVE player in strat. Second, just because I did it doesn't mean I wasn't against it. You can ask anyone in my faction I've repeatedly been against it and when they've tried to raid ACTIVE players I've gone in and changed it from raids to attacks.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://steamcommunity.com/id/evilmagic/

Offline Dutchydave

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 322
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: LL_greatsage, Die_In_A_Fire, Dutchy, Halfcast, basic
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2015, 03:14:52 am »
0
Well Tristan Squids have got rosters every time Narra has been attacked, Narra has been maintained this entire Strat by them, hence calling them AFK is totally false. Your a fucking hypocrite, simple as that. Raiding is lame and you have been caught out dribbling nothing but pathetic lies  :rolleyes:

Offline Tristan_of_Erzoth

  • Game Admin
  • *****
  • Renown: 1000
  • Infamy: 217
  • cRPG Player
  • I dont know
    • View Profile
    • steam id
  • Faction: Calradian Confederacy
  • Game nicks: Tristan_of_Erzoth, Sorcerer_Tholamin, Big_Dick_McCallister
  • IRC nick: wtf is an IRC
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2015, 03:34:17 am »
0
Most of the battles between House Stark and Republic of Squids they fielded nothing. If they field troops for 1 or 2 out of ever 15-16 battles and then for the ones they do its not even squid players, its fairly safe to say they dont play strat anymore. And the fiefs we were attacking, the people didn't play strat anymore. Just because whoever owns Narra logs on once every two days or whatever to get rid of S&D doesn't mean the other players in the clan are active lol.

Images of most the battles before I got too lazy to make screenshots:
(click to show/hide)

Also implying Squids haven't ever raided anywhere.
(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://steamcommunity.com/id/evilmagic/

Offline Talanarsis

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 177
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: House Stark
  • Game nicks: Not so Innocent Virgin
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2015, 03:44:11 am »
+1
Well Tristan Squids have got rosters every time Narra has been attacked, Narra has been maintained this entire Strat by them, hence calling them AFK is totally false. Your a fucking hypocrite, simple as that. Raiding is lame and you have been caught out dribbling nothing but pathetic lies  :rolleyes:

Its true that Tristan is against raiding and those fiefs were owned by AFK people when we attacked. No mercs were hired for the Squids when we took their fiefs, which is why we were surprised that we faced opposition when we attacked Narra.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Dutchydave

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 322
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: LL_greatsage, Die_In_A_Fire, Dutchy, Halfcast, basic
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2015, 05:02:24 am »
0
Most of the battles between House Stark and Republic of Squids they fielded nothing. If they field troops for 1 or 2 out of ever 15-16 battles and then for the ones they do its not even squid players, its fairly safe to say they dont play strat anymore. And the fiefs we were attacking, the people didn't play strat anymore. Just because whoever owns Narra logs on once every two days or whatever to get rid of S&D doesn't mean the other players in the clan are active lol.

Images of most the battles before I got too lazy to make screenshots:
(click to show/hide)


Also implying Squids haven't ever raided anywhere.
(click to show/hide)

Whats to say they aint the actual raids, fiefs after raids or unmanned villages, these pics prove nothing.  :rolleyes: No one ever said anything about squids doing raids, they just pointed out your dribble.

In fact these pics  (some doubles) just prove the squids where active, like serious mate just admit you used lame raid tactics and then posted the opposite in this thread and get a little respect back.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2015, 05:11:25 am by Dutchydave »

Offline Tristan_of_Erzoth

  • Game Admin
  • *****
  • Renown: 1000
  • Infamy: 217
  • cRPG Player
  • I dont know
    • View Profile
    • steam id
  • Faction: Calradian Confederacy
  • Game nicks: Tristan_of_Erzoth, Sorcerer_Tholamin, Big_Dick_McCallister
  • IRC nick: wtf is an IRC
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2015, 06:55:24 am »
0
How do they prove at all the squids were active? They didn't show up to battles, they didn't hire mercs to defend, etc etc. If anything it proves they aren't.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2015, 07:01:40 am by King_Tristan_of_Erzoth »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://steamcommunity.com/id/evilmagic/

Offline Dutchydave

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 322
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: LL_greatsage, Die_In_A_Fire, Dutchy, Halfcast, basic
Re: strategus and raid
« Reply #14 on: April 12, 2015, 01:43:05 pm »
-1
How do they prove at all the squids were active? They didn't show up to battles, they didn't hire mercs to defend, etc etc. If anything it proves they aren't.

just to clear up the Squids raids first of all they are in the middle of the proposed strat time frame. One of the raids is a 1700 vs 1700 on MB( quiet a nice looking battle by the stats we can see) and the raid against Astralis was forfeited, the other raid was against MB by "Cannwennan" who ever the hell that is?

With the pics that you suggest prove Squids where inactive:

- 9v9 Squids showed up vs 14/16 starks.
- Squids attack 3 out of 12 pics.
- 3 out of the 6 battles that they signed people they showed up. The other 6 battles are most likely your raids or attacks after the raid.
- no one from either side showed up
- 4 of the battles only 1 stark showed vs 0 Squids.

These are clearly pics from late 2014/ early 2015 when everyone thought Strat would end at any second and just prove that stark was more active then Squids but Squids where active.

Yes I understand this was starks glory days when they raided and pillaged the land in 3 v1 battles and why you are trying to keep it alive in your heart  :wink: