I am a cav 4 lyf scrub, AMA.

[Kafein]

Would it be hypocrisy if someone would create a mod where one could play a horse crossbowman, but then ban everyone picking that choice?

Wouldn't you ban people who choose to ban themselves?

Ama? Are you a traditional Japanese (and predominantly female) diver?

Prpavi tell me, you don't know what Reddit is, am I right?

[Vibe]

If you choose one door out of three to believe there is a prize behind it (only 1 door contains prize) and I open another door to show you there's no prize behind it, do you open the door you've initially chosen or do you open the other door?

[Kafein]

If you choose one door out of three to believe there is a prize behind it (only 1 door contains prize) and I open another door to show you there's no prize behind it, do you open the door you've initially chosen or do you open the other door?

This again

[NejStark]

Ama? Are you a traditional Japanese (and predominantly female) diver?

No

[Macropus]

Not sure how garbage the archers are atm but with the recent nerfs to cavalry I'd say it put the class from crap to useless

Cav is still strong enough to be considered a lame class.

If you choose one door out of three to believe there is a prize behind it (only 1 door contains prize) and I open another door to show you there's no prize behind it, do you open the door you've initially chosen or do you open the other door?

I'd open the door I have initially chosed as the removal of the third one doesn't affect anything.

[Shemaforash]

nah just because people lack awareness doesn't justify in a class being overpowered, cavalry are so predictable and so easy to kill that it's not even funny

[Vibe]

Cav is still strong enough to be considered a lame class.I'd open the door I have initially chosed as the removal of the third one doesn't affect anything.

is this ur ama m80? also rong

[Macropus]

nah just because people lack awareness doesn't justify in a class being overpowered, cavalry are so predictable and so easy to kill that it's not even funny

Well dont be predictable then. 
Im not talking about backstabbing (although it is a great advantage). Last time i played lancer i could 1vs1 againsf inf pretty often, and im not great at playing cav.

[Kafein]

Macropus is so wrong he's double wrong.

[Macropus]

Macropus is so wrong he's double wrong.

Double wrong means right, right?

[Nessaj]

2010 cav? Or 2010 cav.

[chadz]

I'd open the door I have initially chosed as the removal of the third one doesn't affect anything.

Wrong

door 1 (picked)	door 2	door 3	stay at door 1	switch door
Win	Lose	Lose	Win	Lose
Lose	Win	Lose	Lose	Win
Lose	Lose	Win	Lose	Win

The chance of the original door stays at 1/3rd, but the 2nd door has a chance of 2/3rds

[NejStark]

chadz u so clever.

I would have stayed with the original door. My chances were 1/3. Now they've become 1/2. I already feel like a winner even if there's nothing behind my door.

Nessaj, I didnt play M&B in 2010, so 2014 cav imo. Roll with the blows (edit: and hold your head high).

[Macropus]

Wrong

The chance of the original door stays at 1/3rd, but the 2nd door has a chance of 2/3rds

Are you serious? After the removal of the third door, the chance of original door becomes 1/2 as well as for other door.
The table should be more like:

door 1 (picked)	door 2	door 3	stay at door 1	switch door
Win	Lose	Lose	Win	Lose
Lose	Win	Lose	Lose	Win
Lose	Lose	Win

[Molly]

Are you serious? After the removal of the third door, the chance of original door becomes 1/2 as well as for other door.
The table should be more like:

Monty Hall Problem - a famous brain teaser.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem

Important are the assumptions about another door opened by the "host" with a "Lose" in it and those other ones or it might not work.

The probably most important thing to realize is that the probability of "Win" doesn't change for the door you've chosen when another one is opened. That means with a switch you end up with 2/3 probability.