Author Topic: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?  (Read 2773 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline no_rules_just_play

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1401
  • Infamy: 384
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE; Peasants United; Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: CapraAegagrusHircus_HRE; no_rules_just_play_HRE
  • IRC nick: norulesjustplay
what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« on: May 29, 2014, 10:05:06 am »
+1
Let's say you have 8 riding, what would be the best choice?
« Last Edit: June 02, 2014, 10:47:19 pm by Kalam »

Offline Latvian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1494
  • Infamy: 379
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • с̴͎͖͈͟͠ͅу̷̸̻̣͇͚̫͎͇̩̟̖̪͇̯к̀́͠͞҉͎͚͎а̰̤͕̱͔̬͖̟̺͍͎́͞ ̸͝
    • View Profile
  • Faction: one and only DESERTERS
  • Game nicks: u know its me when you see me
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2014, 10:09:31 am »
+12
none, mod is dеad
people are like potatoes, they come in different shapes and sizes and they all are beautifull
masturbating while looking in a mirror isnt wrong unless its the rear view mirror and you are driving a school buss.

it doesnt matter if you are happiest person or an unfortunate weeper, a powerfull beast or a terrifying creature. we are all equal, in the eyes of the reaper.

Offline Yuang

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 788
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • I love you all
    • View Profile
    • 汉云工作室
  • Faction: Nothing
  • Game nicks: TangSanZang
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2014, 10:10:28 am »
+1
That is a pit!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

I'm who I am, a firework of larruping color.
My time is seven hours earlier than the forum.

Offline Angellore

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 275
  • Infamy: 52
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2014, 01:08:59 pm »
+14
Let's say you have 8 riding, what would be the best choice?
That's the problem with current devs "balancing" ideas. In single patch, they increased heavy horses requirements, decreased heavy horses armor a lot, decreased heavy horses charge a lot, and some heavy horses lost other stats. Same time they buffed most light and medium horses.

For example Eastern Warhorse:
Code: [Select]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| [3] Champion Eastern Warhorse                      | old                            | new                           |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| gold                                               | 107306                         | 101971                        |
| difficulty                                         | 5                              | 7                             |
| hit points                                         | 125                            | 131                           |
| body armor                                         | 51                             | 44                            |
| speed                                              | 41                             | 40                            |
| charge                                             | 40                             | 34                            |
|____________________________________________________|________________________________|_______________________________|
After patch, it not only requires 2 more riding (which is reasonable change, since just 5 riding for all heavy horses was too low imo), but -7 def, -1 speed, -6 charge, and +6 hp.

New Destrier stats (medium horse):
Code: [Select]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| [3] Champion Destrier                              | old                            | new                           |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| difficulty                                         | 5                              | 6                             |
| hit points                                         | 135                            | 150                           |
| body armor                                         | 29                             | 25                            |
| speed                                              | 44                             | 45                            |
|____________________________________________________|________________________________|_______________________________|
It received +15 HP, -4 def, +1 speed, which is clear buff to me.

Comparing Arabian Warhorse and medium horses with heavy ones (but not heaviest):
Quote
Champion Arabian Warhorse 
Speed: 42
Body armor: 18
Hit points: 132
Maneuver: 50
Charge: 16

Champion Destrier 
Speed: 45
Body armor: 25
Hit points: 150
Maneuver: 44
Charge: 22
Champion Barded Warhorse 
Speed: 43
Body armor: 32
Hit points: 143
Maneuver: 44
Charge: 26
Champion Padded Warhorse 
Speed: 44
Body armor: 34
Hit points: 146
Maneuver: 43
Charge: 28
Champion War Horse 
Speed: 43
Body armor: 38
Hit points: 140
Maneuver: 43
Charge: 32
Champion Large Warhorse 
Speed: 42
Body armor: 41
Hit points: 151
Maneuver: 42
Charge: 35
Champion Eastern Warhorse 
Speed: 40
Body armor: 44
Hit points: 131
Maneuver: 44
Charge: 34
Champion Cataphract Horse 
Speed: 42
Body armor: 46
Hit points: 143
Maneuver: 41
Charge: 37
Even Arabian Warhorse (light horse) has more HP now than Eastern Warhorse (which supposed to be heavy horse). Large Warhorse has almost same HP as Destrier, Padded Warhorse and Barded Warhorses are not far away too. War Horse (I consider it as last medium horse, but it's more like in between) has just 8% armor less than Large Warhorse, while having more reasonable speed/maneuver stats.

Whoever played cav in crpg, should know horse HP is the thing which matters the most with high damage hits (arbalest, heavy xbow, long bow, high damage 2h swing, high damage pole swing, high damage throwing weapons), while armor protects mainly - but not only of course - from low damage hits (horse archers, archers with low tier bows, people with low PS or low damage weapons).
I played my heavy horse mainly to counter archers with low tier bows (like horn bows) and HAs, they were doing max 1/10th damage to my horse (in most cases not even that much). Now, with body armor decreased in heavy horses, and same time HP increased in medium horses, I see absolutely no reason to take heavy horse! Especially medium horses are much better in avoiding everything, from throwing stuff, archers, xbowmans, to other cav and aware infantry. Riding on heavy horse, which has just slightly stronger defence now than medium one, is stupid (eg. now Eastern Warhorse dies from 2 bolts from Arbalest, Destrier also dies from 2 bolts from Arbalest). Devs could just remove Large Warhorse, Cataphract Warhorse and Eastern Warhorse, as their hp, decreased body def and especially speed/maneuver abilities are terrible compared to buffed medium horses. Those 3 horses just lost their ability to survive high amount of low damage hits, so the only advantage they had over medium horses.
In case of Charger, Mamluk Horse and Plated Charger - I never really liked those horses, because of their low speed/maneuver. Now, with decreased survivability (eg. Plated Charger lost 9 HP and whole 10 armor), I don't like them even more than before.
From my point of view, far best horses now are some light and all medium ones (basically all horses in shop from Courser to War Horse). I don't understand why light and medium horses were buffed, especially their survivability, but now there is absolutely no sense to use heavier horse than War Horse.

This patch is same kind of absurd, as archery low tier bows change (their current crazy missile speed and accuracy).
If chadz wanted to show he wasn't that bad dev, by giving crpg development to complete amateur hands, his plan worked brilliantly. All those broken promises, patches which never came, destroyed builds, rollbacks, even database resets (yeah, I remember those) were nothing, comparing to what new devs are doing with this game. From one hand, it's a shame crpg ends like that, but from the other, many people can finally free themselves from long years of crpg addiction.

Offline Radament

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • ☑Yes ☒No
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction
  • Game nicks: «Radament» «Miasma»
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2014, 01:29:36 pm »
+4
Blame Fips  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Perverz

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 381
  • Infamy: 180
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Barabe_Perverz
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2014, 02:05:41 pm »
+1
This patch is same kind of absurd, as archery low tier bows change (their current crazy missile speed and accuracy).
If chadz wanted to show he wasn't that bad dev, by giving crpg development to complete amateur hands, his plan worked brilliantly. All those broken promises, patches which never came, destroyed builds, rollbacks, even database resets (yeah, I remember those) were nothing, comparing to what new devs are doing with this game. From one hand, it's a shame crpg ends like that, but from the other, many people can finally free themselves from long years of crpg addiction.


 :!: :!: :!: :!:
BARABE:
those without the necessary properties of good in human society, coarse, vulgar and violent man, scumbags

Offline FRANK_THE_TANK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1312
  • Infamy: 339
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • FluckCucker
    • View Profile
  • Faction: A Free and proud Peasant of Fisdnar!!!
  • Game nicks: FRANK_THE_TANK
  • IRC nick: Sippy sip
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2014, 02:19:39 pm »
+5
Please leave them be, I can smell freedom. It's so close. Oh god it's so close.
Fammi un pompino!

I think I have ball cancer in my right nut :(
Good news everybody! It's not nut cancer :)
Bad news everybody, I got dumped :(

Offline no_rules_just_play

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1401
  • Infamy: 384
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE; Peasants United; Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: CapraAegagrusHircus_HRE; no_rules_just_play_HRE
  • IRC nick: norulesjustplay
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2014, 02:23:25 pm »
0
Thanks angellore! I'm bad at reading stats and thos certainly helps! :)

Offline Riddaren

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 601
  • Infamy: 298
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Riddaren, Matthaus
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2014, 11:42:51 pm »
+1
(click to show/hide)

Great post Angellore. It's indeed absurd changes that has been made to nerf heavy cavalry.

Not only are the heavy horses now weaker. By raising the riding requirement to 8 the rider now has 9 less strength.
3 power strike less and 9 to 15 hitpoints less (15 with +3 IF) really makes a difference.

Heavy cavalry isn't heavy cavalry anymore and I see no reason to get 8 riding and use a heavy horse other than for the looks.



Regarding the original post, it's clear that playing as a lancer on a heavy horse is not the way to go now.
Using a light lance, lance or heavy lance with only 4-5 PS is really bad and you don't want to convert too many skill points either (to get 6 PS).
Furthermore using heavy armor from horseback is shittier than ever before as well because of 9-15 hitpoints less.

So I would recommend 12/24 with lots of skills instead, including shield skill, since you will have less armor and hp.
Then use a 1H or the great lance which works perfectly with only 4PS and 0 WM.

But then again, why would you use a "heavy horse" at all? No matter the build or class, it's more worth it to stick with a 6-7 riding skill horse as it is now.

By the way, why is it that the courser and the arabian warhorse still don't have the same riding requirement?!
They are each other's opposites, aren't they?

Offline BlueKnight

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 983
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • If you run, you will only die tired...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2014, 11:49:26 pm »
0
Let's say you have 8 riding, what would be the best choice?
Assuming we are only talking about heavy horses, mamluk because it's tiny and still maneuverable. The rest of heavy horses are only good for riding forward...
« Last Edit: May 31, 2014, 12:00:32 am by BlueKnight »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Skyrim UI

Offline the real god emperor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1630
  • Infamy: 348
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • Et tu, Brute?
    • View Profile
    • Click for gifts
  • Faction: Rome
  • Game nicks: Captain_Sweden
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2014, 12:03:19 am »
0
But still Eastern Warhorse seems to be the best choice, am I right?

Offline oreshy

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 169
  • Infamy: 30
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Braxli
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2014, 01:27:45 am »
+1
...desoxyribonukleinsaeure.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline NJ_Legion_Icedtea

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 259
  • Infamy: 35
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Norsemen
  • Game nicks: Norse_Icedtea
  • IRC nick: Icedtea
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2014, 01:46:30 am »
0
Plated Charger? With 8 riding skill it wouldn't be the fat clumsy elephant anymore surely?

Offline Ronin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 859
  • Infamy: 198
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2014, 12:46:56 pm »
0
I'd say Eastern warhorse is quite good. It has the highest manuever: 42
It has the same manuever with a destrier. Has also better survival and charge. But that's just my opinion.
Quote from: BlindGuy
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.

My UU key is broken incase you can't tell :D

Offline STR_aD_Sargon_eqv

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 96
  • Infamy: 86
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: what heavy cav horses are the least fucked?
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2014, 05:31:06 pm »
0
I'd say Eastern warhorse is quite good. It has the highest manuever: 42
It has the same manuever with a destrier. Has also better survival and charge. But that's just my opinion.

wrong. it has more less HP.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login