Author Topic: An Overall look at Admin's  (Read 5905 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Varric

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 70
  • Infamy: 19
  • cRPG Player
  • Lord of the Sun
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Varangians
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #45 on: May 19, 2011, 11:18:18 pm »
0
No.

Offline Wrenaq_Lars

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 12
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: MonkeyBlade
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #46 on: May 20, 2011, 01:09:47 am »
0
the admins on eu4 ignore blatant racist comments

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #47 on: May 20, 2011, 03:17:01 am »
0
Sometimes, I think ideal admins should be faster to send warnings and kicks, and slower to ban.

Most QQ threads comes from douchebags that were banned without warnings. Still douchebags, but sometimes admins should be a little less hot tempered, that would make cases clearer.

Banning someone without warnings for one (yes, one) line in the chat or one (even intentional) TK sounds harsh, yet many admins just do it right away.

Offline Nindur

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 29
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northern Empire Rebellion
  • Game nicks: N1nd3r9
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #48 on: May 20, 2011, 03:37:51 am »
0
Something else that people should realize is that anyone with evidence of admin abuse is welcome to forward it to me, Gash, or ecko( away on vacation at the moment). Also I am finding it difficult to tell which people are complaining about EU abuse and which people are complaing about NA abuse, I recognize very few names in this thread so I assume you are mostly talking about EU. Also -Protip- A perma ban is not permanent, most player are banned for less then a day or two. Fun Fact: There are 37 Active bans on the NA servers, since they came online. 13 are from the same 2 players crashing other players with crazy Image names, and another player was banned under 4 different names for the same reason. So 17 out of 37 Now active bans are from people crashing the server, so we have 20 active bans since the NA servers came online.

IMO that's not too bad considering how many crackheads we deal with.

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #49 on: May 20, 2011, 05:19:33 am »
0
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #50 on: May 20, 2011, 06:20:34 am »
0
considering how many crackheads we deal with.

Indeed sir, indeed.
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Kung Fu Jesus

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #51 on: May 20, 2011, 10:12:13 am »
0
I just want to see someone who isn't banned complain about an admin...

I don't remember if I've complained about any specific admins but I have complained about the ways some things are done by admins.
"My belt holds up my pants and my pants have belt loops that hold up the belt. What the fuckĀ’'s really going on down there? Who is the real hero?" - Mitch

Offline nuffen

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 113
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Nuffen Fallen_Lilith Fallen_Little_Nuff
  • IRC nick: nuffen
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #52 on: May 20, 2011, 10:21:09 am »
0
Most QQ threads comes from douchebags that were banned without warnings. Still douchebags, but sometimes admins should be a little less hot tempered, that would make cases clearer.

Banning someone without warnings for one (yes, one) line in the chat or one (even intentional) TK sounds harsh, yet many admins just do it right away.

In my experience these douchebags claims to have received no warnings, when the logs shows they got several. Some of them even received kick-warnings. They still claim there was no warnings.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Phazey

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Phaz, Merc_Phazh, Merc_Phazhe, Merc_Phazhey and Merc_Phazey
  • IRC nick: Phazh
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #53 on: May 20, 2011, 10:56:45 am »
0
The only Merc admin I know of is Phazh and it wasn't him.
Qft! It wasn't me! Damn those aboozers.

Seriously though. More playing, less whine and cheeze.  :wink:

Offline hyena

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
  • Sausage and Egg McMuffin
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hyena
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #54 on: May 20, 2011, 12:13:55 pm »
0
I haven't personally any major issues with Admins, I've been playing on and off for a few months and everyone seems quite capable.

The only thing I'd like is a bit of a toning down with all the homophobic comments going around, but as a gay man playing online games i've got a thick skin to it all.

Offline Nindur

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 29
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northern Empire Rebellion
  • Game nicks: N1nd3r9
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #55 on: May 20, 2011, 12:44:50 pm »
0

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #56 on: May 20, 2011, 01:33:02 pm »
0
Should we make a Nuffen fan club? I'd be it's first member :D
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Elmetiacos

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • You've probably teamkilled me
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hot_Chick_with_a_Sword, Dark_Rose_Knight
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #57 on: May 20, 2011, 04:57:50 pm »
0
the admins on eu4 ignore blatant racist comments
EU4 tends to collect people who've been banned from other servers for various reasons.
The word is "anyway" not "anyways". You are not Gabby Hayes.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Phazey

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Phaz, Merc_Phazh, Merc_Phazhe, Merc_Phazhey and Merc_Phazey
  • IRC nick: Phazh
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #58 on: May 20, 2011, 05:20:41 pm »
0
EU4 tends to collect people who've been banned from other servers for various reasons.
Funny but true. EU4 is the Tortuga of cRPG. Pirates and scoundrels mostly. Even the admins are evil there!  :twisted:

Offline Tristan

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 200
  • Infamy: 52
  • cRPG Player
  • Listen to wisdom!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild (Guards)
  • Game nicks: Guard_Tristan
  • IRC nick: Guard_Tristan
Re: An Overall look at Admin's
« Reply #59 on: May 20, 2011, 05:21:10 pm »
0
Phaz is not the only merc admin.
He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief. He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened his mouth.