Obviously the circumstances and pay off are much better, but I mean that the action itself could get very tedious. It all depends on to what extent he is able to actually play the full reach of poker on 24 tables, whether he is analyzing 160 opponents at the same time or not. Which would make him a serious wizard, but I can imagine he doesn't have to. The thing about playing 24 tables is that he doesn't need to win big on any single one of them, he just needs to get a good average and win big through the sheer amount of hands he plays. I could imagine he is playing 24 tables very safely, probably estimating his own win chances correctly everytime due to sheer experience and game knowledge, but without concerning himself too much with the long term patterns of other players. In which case poker becomes a fairly boring game at least I'd think so, after a time it just becomes folding or calling systematically.