Why doesn't reading count as reading?
lol, why not? Crime and punishment is shitty book only because it's required reading in school? All books I've read in my youth and which in big part moulded my character suddenly "do not count" only cause I've read them as a kid? Hm...
Grown up books, like "War and Peace" or "100 years of solitude", were written by adults, for adults. A teenager can read them, but it will be a time wasted. Watching how letters form words, enough to have a vague knowledge of the main plot - it's not reading. But fine! That is my personal opinion
Let's leave it at that, and I apologies if it was insulting.
Whats wrong with good childrens books?
They are for children, and at very best, carry a tiny grain of what an adult story would deliver.
In my opinion, Alice in Wonderland is the only title on that list, that delivers something different for both adults and children. Though Carroll was high as kite when he wrote it
I think the list was rather about influential and commonly known than elitist books, which it represented quite well (of those written in English)
Why Mark Twain is not on that list?.. Jack London? Hemingway? Swift? Vonnegut? Why not any other, completly random Englsih or American writer? Non-English books represented so briefly, it would be best not to include any at all! Insulting and disgusting.
Harry Potter was there btw
It had to be!
How can you know that book isn't worth a reading before you actually read it? YOu base your judgment exclusively on the opinion of others? Or maybe on the title?
I don't! As this list is so random, there might just as well be a hidden gem
That Japanese author is probably decent, since so few non-English were included.