Funny though that nobody complained when they started their protests in 2011 against a legitimate government but when 30 million + people protested against the Brotherhood when they were in control it's just to ignore lol.
Army did a good call.
How was Mubarak's government a legitimate government when it wasn't chosen by the people and it supressed other political parties? And whoever said "30 million protesters" must be blind and a shit lier.
Opponents of Morsy claimed Google Earth had published figures suggesting 33 million demonstrators were on the streets. Responding to the claims that it recorded 33 million protesters in Tahrir Square, Google confirmed that its engines do not have the ability to estimate numbers of rallies or protests on the ground. Furthermore, it insisted that it does not publish live imaging of protests or any other events on planet earth.[380] Later, Aljazeera News Channel also broadcast a documentary suggesting through calculations and experts analysis that the number of those who protested against Morsi in Cairo couldn't have exceeded 800,000 in Cairo and 4 Millions across Egypt
First revolution had 2 million just in Tahrir square.
It was a really stupid move from Mursi to try and pull off what he did. I haven't really read about what he tried to implement but from what I've read from the anti-Mursi point of view he tried to give himself the powers of a dictator until a new assembly was chosen. It could have been solved by not allowing him to do so. But supporting the fact that military got involved and removes a president, sentences his supporters to death, frees the old dictator and then the Army commander resigns to "enter the presidental elections" is fucking stupid. This is the typical Arab style of politics where military commanders seize the power. But we'll see what happens in the new elections. If the military commander Sisi gets "elected" then Egypt achieved nothing with the revolutions.
