I provided 2 links with dozens of researches about romantic relationships and types of it. Prooving that there is a huge variety of those. You said only "Nope" about it and answered to this post with
I asked you how either of those disproves or contradicts what I said. Neither of them does.
Obviously all relationships are not 100% identical. I thought that much was clear without saying.
But you are right im wrong. I thought that definition of rational used in this topic means counter to individual emotion based opinion hence intersubjective verifiable so i provided scientific data to proof my point. Yet you said that studying this for 8 years is a waste of time (contrary to rocket science i believe) so you dont show much respect to this branch of science. This brings me to conclusion that you are the only one who can decide if sth is rational and worth studying or not so definition of rational thinking in this topic is "Xant way of thinking".
This explains mayby why you think that entering a relationship will end up in you being exploited by your partner.
You provided two research papers and claimed they proved your point without saying how exactly they're supposed to do that.
It's not the branch of science I have little respect for, it's your saying that you spent "8 years studying it in school", which translates to "8 years studying it ineffectually." Not impressed.
I also never said that I think entering a relationship will end up in being exploited by your partner.