An idea: SEND OUT YOUR CHAMPION

[NejStark]

Tired of getting loads of XP for fighting 3-hour long battles?
Want a battle to be resolved ina  relatively short time?

SEND OUT YOUR CHAMPION.

If each side agree, commanders can pick one rostered player to fight the other in a duel.

One side wins. Gets loads of whatever.

[Corsair831]

mmmmmm would only work if both commanders had to agree to it beforehand.

could be kinda cool though, one life only all or nothing duel

[StonedSteel]

somewhere out there

sir firebus is drooling while he reads this

[NejStark]

Thatswhat I like about it, no doubt there are quite a few really good players who would like this. They could become real assets and make large demands for their championing. Could be interesting.

[dynamike]

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Elindor]

If this gets implemented, Marcus will be the richest man alive.

[Jarlek]

If this gets implemented, Marcus will be the richest man alive.

?

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Panos_]

Tired of getting loads of XP for fighting 3-hour long battles?
Want a battle to be resolved ina  relatively short time?

SEND OUT YOUR CHAMPION.

If each side agree, commanders can pick one rostered player to fight the other in a duel.

One side wins. Gets loads of whatever.

It would be even better, if the losing side had an impact on morale, and by morale I mean lets say 50%+ increased spawn time

[Algarn]

50 ??? A bit high I think ;) Loosing a duel because of a disconnect or after a short duel shouldn't be so devastating for the losing side. Just make it like spawning 20-25% faster, no more.

[NejStark]

I think the practicality of doing this was to stop both sides losing gear/casualties. One side would be victor, but both sides get to keep their ticks (-1 for losing side ), stuff (with losing side leaving a town/castle if its a siege for example).
Saying that.. a losing attacker could just re-seige straight away, not sure how to get around that without severe and unpopular limitations... Maybe Ive read too much Game of Thrones..

[CrazyCracka420]

I could maybe see allowing the loser to keep troops, but not the gear.  They should lose the gear/equipment to the victor.  Otherwise what's the point?

[arowaine]

the idea is awesome

[Teeth]

No thanks, duel heroes do a fine job self inflating their egos, we don't need to encourage that.

[Corsair831]

No thanks, duel heroes do a fine job self inflating their egos, we don't need to encourage that.

teeth the fun killer strikes again 

[Taser]

Saying that.. a losing attacker could just re-seige straight away, not sure how to get around that without severe and unpopular limitations... Maybe Ive read too much Game of Thrones..

I would think that if this was implemented.. (not that it will or maybe shouldn't be) but if it was.. that if someone did do that then they'd be shamed by the community as long as enough people honored the duels. If it wasn't honored by enough people for it to be shameful then.. yeah that wouldn't matter.

Huseby's suggestion is good. That they can keep their troops but not their gear. Would settle that or could even be an option both sides could pick if they wanted to do this with the norm being that one side simply loses.

Either way I like the idea but not sure enough people would go for it.