0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Everyone who wanted to vote no didn't have this option
Not entirely true. It is autonomous even now.By second point Crimea would get right to make their own foreign policy with all consequences.
It has become a mootpoint, but from now on they can always explain the good result by the fact everyone who wanted to vote no, didnt vote, and they wouldnt be far from the reality, increasing the legitimacy of the referendum result and accusing the poor democratic response of the anti-russian Crimean people...
Forgot to read
Russia gets "Dishonorable scum" Casus Belli for forced annex
It might be hard for a thinking-challenged Russian to understand, but option two would not in practice be any different from option one.
It might be hard for a thinking-challenged EU my old friend to understand what it aleast would have shown that the population of Crimea is not united in their desire to join Russia. Now USA USA USA puppets in UNa forced act not only against the chocolate chip cookie Russia but also against 96% population of Crimea (on paper atleast).
No, it wouldn't have shown that. The options were "join Russia" or "join Russia after the pro-Russian government says we join Russia." Even if there was a "fuck off" option, how do you know the results wouldn't be manipulated? The current situation in Crime is not exactly the best for neutral and fair elections.
[...] so I guess this referendum will be 99.8% for joining Russia with more than 100% of votes.
Oh lol Just read the official announcement of Mikhail Malyshev (the head of referendum commission): he said that during elections 1,250,426 voted in Crimea besides Sevastopol and 1,724,563 including it. 1,724,563 - 1,250,426 = 474,137. It's 100,000 more people than there are registered citizens in Sevastopol including kids
Russia gets -143 Aggressive Expansion malus with Norway, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lituania, Poland, Belarus, Khazakstan, Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine, Moldova and Azerbaidjan
Link please