Yeah. There is nothing wrong when people agree on things. There is nothing wrong when people don't agree neither. But with your attitude it's just all wrong. You pick your position in debate because "look mom, I don't support mainstream, I'm special" and it's hardly even an opinion because you question a lot but then refuse to hear answers. You speak just to speak bringing nothing useful into actual discussion. What is strange that you don't even try to hide it. And instead of discussing actually Ukraine and what is happening there you get your attention. I guess you should be happy now.
If you want any useful discussion or debates, you have to come with facts, trustworthy links and news. There is no need to make this thread a flamewar.
Some recent info: self proclaimed prime minister of Crimea Aksyonov wants to "nationalize" private and Ukrainian property after joining Russia. It will cover not only Ukrainian military property in Crimea (vehicles, vessels, aircraft), but also energetics (even private). He mentioned that the list will be wider but majority of private factories will stay private. I personally see it as a huge pile of money, Aksyonov will sell a lot of ground there and will steal billions of dollars. That's quite obvious.
Just some of my thoughts in case Crimea gets to Russia: As I've already stated in one of my posts - Crimea will be isolated pretty bad. First of all: electricity, gas, water, food, communications. It all comes from the North and will come from the other country for international prices (read as extremely high). Crimea is a region with almost no production, it consumes significantly more than it produces. Even if all taxes will come to their local budget - they would be barely able to pay even a half of their needs (if they were in Ukraine). While being a part of Russia all the problems will get to a critical level. Their main source of money and working places is tourism. 2/3-3/4 of tourists came from other parts of Ukraine. It doesn't require to be smart to understand that people will avoid unrecognised country (will be the same situation as always: recognized by Russia and a couple of 3rd world countries). Also it's quite obvious that Crimea will not compete with tourism rivals (just rebuilt Sochi in Russia or Odessa in Ukraine). I guess it will require A LOT of money from Russia to make things working at least somehow. Because if it will get annexed without fight - there will be nobody to blame (like you can't blame Ukrainians for destroying their economy with tanks). So other regions of Russia feel new territories with their own pocket.
с землей - там все не так просто. такие вещи я уже не стану на форуме писать
но советую посмотреть на внешне-политическую активность Януковича во время всего это бардака в Киеве.
все, что могу сказать, так это то, что Крым уже продан.
ссылки давать не буду. кто ищет - тот всегда найдет.
что касается инфраструктуры - так это и есть единственная адекватная причина по которой Крым остается в составе Украины даже если не смотреть на результаты грядущего референдума.
легитимность которого эквивалентна легитимности действующей власти в Украине
татары, которых только и видно на ТВ на самом деле не так уж и много и их не треть, а меньше. намного меньше.