One has to be incredibly dumb to realise this and believe this all so blindly. When someone doesnt agree with your wierdass world order bullcrap it more of proof that their mental health is okay. I can connect the dots too mate and reach different conclusions. Every person can. You pretty much stacked together many events and evidence and came up with a wierdo idea yourself, which you think is somekind of undeniable fact. Im not saying you arent correct. There is a possibility that you are right, but all this is you belive is worthless, unproven, lacks any kind of backing and is simply visioned to far in to the future and is to massive by scale in general to consider as some truth. After WW2 people like you have published all kinds of ideas and books and movies about all kinds of conclusions like this. Basically 1/10 was mybe somewhat an actual hit. So dont spin your conspiracymumbojumbo here and call others brainwashed and dumb, when you are the one with the sketchy farfetched stories that only a person whose been on the actual inside of all of this could possibly even know.
Another curious thing id like to ask is how do you see the quaporation between US and EU governments even work, when actually planning a longtime worlddominationscheme? The governmentmembers get briefed or something? What happens when some countries governments get switched and new members come to power? New members get briefed on worlddomination? 
Why wont the old ones than come forth. You see the big hole in your theory is that a plan like this would require a lot of preparation and people in power. And not all politicians are heartless and unintelligent. If some politicians knew or even assumed they were contributing to such cause they would run to the media. Why basically noone has? And now here comes Murmillus the visionary and claims we are all blind and dumb. GG. PS: If you do manage to find 1 or 2 politicians actually claiming this, its not enough man.
Based on you knowledge of the conflicts, sectarian divisions, political ambitions of some of the major actors in the Middle-East I'm not insulted when you call me dumb. I seem to know a lot more in this area than yourself, but you call aspects of what you do not know or understand dumb, that is a dumb thing to do.
When Saddam Hussain was in power in Iraq, we know he was no saint and he was a bloody murderer but he also held Iraq together. Shia's and Sunni neighbourhoods were not at war with one another.
When Gaddafi was in power in Libya, Libya turned from a desert dustbowl into a relatively developed country which offered free education and healthcare to its people, he built Libya's man made river and brought water to once barren parts of Libya.
For all of their faults and for all the Western propaganda disseminated about them they held their countries together, albeit it can be argued with an iron fist, they held shit together and people could live in relative peace. Along comes NATO and all that comes to an end and endless civil war is all that remains, after the remains of hundreds of thousands of people innocent and military that is..
The above stated is factual and is based on events that ACTUALLY transpired, you can call my analysis dumb but it has much truth, any amount of name calling cannot discredit my statements alone. You've bought hook line and sinker into anti-Muslim propaganda, peddled by nationalist groups, anyone with their hands in the Middle-East and Israel, and you call me dumb, laughable.
I'm not going to pretend to know the intricacies between the relationship between various national leaders, but put it this way, the European Union has strengthened the U.S's position in Europe. Once a whole host of people are lead by so few, there are only a few that need to be in the know and need to be bought off, hardly something they will openly broadcast.
Remember weapons expert David Kelly? A respectable man whom worked for British Defence intelligence staff, had assessed the "WMD" threat posed by the WMD dossier and found it lacking in convincing evidence, he himself visited Iraq prior to the conflict and found no evidence to support claims such as, "Iraq was capable of firing battlefield biological and chemical weapons within 45 minutes of an order to use them ", he was a voice in the establishment whom opposed their agenda and eagerness to bomb Iraq back to the stone age. He was found apparently having committed suicide on 17th July 2003, I don't believe he committed suicide, he had little reason to do so, he was a voice of reason in the whole lead up to the Iraqi debacle, one I believed silenced.
I found this paragraph in Wikipedia in regards to his death.
"On the morning of 17 July 2003, Kelly was working as usual at home in Oxfordshire. Media coverage of his public appearance two days before had led many of his friends to send him supportive emails, to which he was responding. One of the emails he sent that day was to New York Times journalist Judith Miller,[20] who had used Kelly as a source in a book on bioterrorism and to whom Kelly had mentioned "
many dark actors playing games."[21][22] He also received an email from his superiors at the Ministry of Defence asking for more details of his contacts with journalists."
Indeed, many dark actors playing many, deadly games, fooling the likes of you Tibe, but don't despair you're far from the only one fooled by the mainstream political narrative.
Poll