You're competing with Anuran for forum cretin of the year. By the way Xant already won forum douche.
It's hard to deny that the combined interests of nation states result in wars and genocide. Of course "national sovereignty" is more catchy than "local despotism", and is a great communication asset for dictatorships. Also, NATO is a matter that pertains its members and would-be members. Russia clearly doesn't want to be part of NATO so why is Russia meddling in NATO affairs? The Russian media's constant effort to interpret real or alleged actions of NATO states as some sort of anti-Russian conspiracy (which makes zero sense by the way) is the only thing that could possibly make claims such as "NATO's initial purpose was to keep the Soviet Union in check" not look horribly stupid. If NATO actually followed its "national" interests you'd think Brazil would have been "attacked" by now. But somehow Brazil which is a functioning and peaceful modern democracy with decent human rights doesn't get half as much attention from NATO forces as expansionist local bullies Russia and China.
Yeah, national sovereignty is certainly catchier than "local despotism", because without national sovereignty there is no national identity. When a nation is broken down from the national level its divided into ethnicity, religion, culture and so forth, and unfortunately these aspects in many places around the world are far more divisive than they would be in the Western societies we're accustomed to. Just look what NATO achieved after denying Libya the right to be ruled by its own people, after the West decided who would be allowed to rule Libya we now see the nation in ruins, one that's now rampant with murder, infighting and that's become a jihadist stronghold. One size does not fit all, to have such a mentality is to view our own politics with rose tinted glasses as though every person around the globe holds the same ideals and goals in life that many Westerners do and to think that non-Western countries can be ruled by Western style governments is fantasy. It doesn't work, much of the world is not nearly as developed as the West and therefore the Western model simply does not fit. Every government installed by the West has been rotten and corrupt to the core, you cannot change a leopards spots by throwing dollars at it.
Clearly it is NATO that seeks to meddle with Russian, Iranian, Chinese and other states interests, it is NATO members that are surrounding states with military bases and missile "shields", it is NATO membership that's growing and encroaching on Russian borders, how can you blame the victims and excuse the aggressors Kafeine? (Kind of a silly question, I've made many points about emotionally charged western propaganda encouraging people to form likewise opinions.)
If NATO wiped away its apparently "respectable", "humanitarian" façade then they would easily become an easily exploited target by the free press (what little of it remains), and its geopolitical rivals. The main reason Brazil is largely ignored right now is down to plain old geopolitics. The regions in which NATO interfere the most are regions in which its rival states have natural regional enemies and opponents from which NATO can exploit and manipulate. (In the far East, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and others), (In Europe, Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Finland, and others), (In Middle-East, Turkey, Saudi-Arabia, Qatar and others). NATO needs to legitimise itself and its actions through formations of multilateral groups of nations and interests, it needs a smoke screen to excuse its actions for without it can easily be accused of being the very threat it purports to keep in check. NATO's goals are purely geopolitical and unipolar in nature with the guise of multilateralism, if it actually upheld the democratic principles you think it does then why does it all too often side with "despots" and "dicatators" when it suits its agenda? Because when you focus on who NATO gets into bed with, you realise how NATO itself has undermined its own purported principles of democracy and humanitarianism and this should set off alarm bells in the minds of anyone who views NATO through rose tinted glasses.
Poll