Tatar bow

[spiritus]

Nomad Bow
missile speed: 48           
weight: 2.4
accuracy: 101
difficulty: 2
speed rating: 68
missile speed: 48
thrust damage: 23 cut
slots: 1

Tatar Bow
missile speed: 46    -2 missile speed
weight: 2.4
accuracy: 101
difficulty: 3
speed rating: 65      -3 speed
missile speed: 46
thrust damage: 24 cut  +1 cut
slots: 1

Horn Bow
missile speed: 44  -4 missile speed
weight: 2.7
accuracy: 101
difficulty: 5
speed rating: 59 -9 speed
missile speed: 44
thrust damage: 26 cut +3 cut
slots: 1

Statistically wise the tatar bow is inferior. The tatar bows looses 2 speed for 1 cut while from the nomad bow while the horn looses 4 speed from the nomad bow for 3 damage.

[spiritus]

bump

[Rumblood]

This is a suggestion forum. All I see are tears.

[Bulzur]

Comparing only 2 stats 'damage and missile speed), when there's also, and one of the most important for range duels, shooting speed. There's also the price of the item...
Such a biaised suggestion.

Tatar bow is fine as it is.

[MURDERTRON]

How is arc or distance calculated?  Missile speed?

[Nightmare798]

This is a suggestion forum. All I see are tears.

He is not QQing. He is comparing three weapons and suggesting that the inferior one should be buffed.

[Rumblood]

He is not QQing. He is comparing three weapons and suggesting that the inferior one should be buffed.

He didn't suggest a thing. He posted some stats and claims one is inferior with no thought as to why those stats make it inferior, nor what should be done about it, if anything. That's QQ'ing.

Oh, and I own all 3 MW and use them on a regular basis. He is wrong. They all have their own situations that make them superior. That Tatar bow with faster draw speed will chew up that Horn bow archer on an even playing field and the Nomad will take them both.

[spiritus]

This is a suggestion forum. All I see are tears.

im not an archer i dont use the tatar bow never have

[spiritus]

He didn't suggest a thing. He posted some stats and claims one is inferior with no thought as to why those stats make it inferior, nor what should be done about it, if anything. That's QQ'ing.

Oh, and I own all 3 MW and use them on a regular basis. He is wrong. They all have their own situations that make them superior. That Tatar bow with faster draw speed will chew up that Horn bow archer on an even playing field and the Nomad will take them both.

wow bro dont take it personal i just pointed out that the tatar is inferior stat wise....... dam who made u admin!

[Ronin]

Tatar bow isn't that bad in my opinion. It's one of the best bows for HA.

[spiritus]

He didn't suggest a thing. He posted some stats and claims one is inferior with no thought as to why those stats make it inferior, nor what should be done about it, if anything. That's QQ'ing.

Oh, and I own all 3 MW and use them on a regular basis. He is wrong. They all have their own situations that make them superior. That Tatar bow with faster draw speed will chew up that Horn bow archer on an even playing field and the Nomad will take them both.

how fucking retarded are u i posted why the tatar is inferior im just trying to point something out i really dont care im melee and if i do decide to be range its crossbow for me

[Ronin]

how fucking retarded are u i posted why the tatar is inferior im just trying to point something out i really dont care im melee and if i do decide to be range its crossbow for me

Dude no offense but an archer probably knows more about bows than a melee guy. I'm not saying melee guys should not make any suggestions outside of their classes, but you are taking this a bit far.