3D goggles on Every Television. KICKSTARTER LAUNCHED!!!

[EricCire]

...

[EricCire]

...

[Sir_Hans]

(click to show/hide)

Hans this is a new technology. The lens converges the images. You do not need to cross your eyes at all. I appreciate you guys's comments. It helps me see the things that I need to explain more, or left out.

(click to show/hide)

Exaclty, the lens converges the images. That's why it's called converging lens. Some how 3D technology has missed this and I've patented it. The lens converges and magnifies the image and cuts off the triple vision with the shutters, making the image appear full. It's a new way of 3D 
It's time for 3D to be much more simple than what it is. Just 3D glasses and a 3D application to change the games, images and movies  into side by side images.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

That wasn't a very good explanation. All you did was show some artwork and diagrams describing different types of lenses and mirrors... images that you can't take credit for.
If it's in the lens do you have to sit at a certain point to get the images to line up? what happens if you move your head back or forward a little bit, or move your head side to side?

Can you post a link to your patent please, I'd like to get a full explanation on it. Surely you would want to list this after spending such a required sum of money to patent it. (might be a good thing to list on your kickstarter to.) I'm guessing its a design patent, rather than a utility patent?

Not so.. The left image is tilted differently from the right image, so the brain still see's the full image as 3D. The mid section is the one with the most depth however, so you got it kind of right. This is not a problem for first person, as I always play in first person. First person with these are really dope! The only time it's bad is when you get shot in the face with an arrow; you can almost fill the arrow hit your forehead, eye or jaw.
Also let me mention that this technology is similar to the 3D televisions that do not need glasses, but it's in reverse. The 3D goggles (glasses) do not need a 3D tv.
I would also like to note that the 3D televisions that do not need glasses lack depth because of there approach. iYin3D goggles on the other hand has a lot of depth, making a pole arm seem it's full length.

How is there any depth to the parts of the picture which are only shown once, from one perspective?

[EricCire]

...

[no_rules_just_play]

How is there any depth to the parts of the picture which are only shown once, from one perspective?

this is what I meant, the part of the image showed twice is only as wide as the horse and the roof behind it.

[EricCire]

...

[Sir_Hans]

look, just take a class in psychology sensual perception and maybe you'll learn a trick or two on the way the brain and eyes perceives images. I have my masters in psychology and that's my advice to you. be gone troll.

Nice explanation. I take it you are just bullshitting about having a patent. Anyone who took the trouble to spend money and research on a patent would be happy to provide information about it.

All my questions and suggestions were serious. It seems you are the one that isn't serious in trying to explain your product.

But go ahead, call me a troll just because I won't take your random linked images as an explanation.
You're only doing a disservice to yourself by not going into detail and taking serious inquiry, seriously.

Straight from kickstarter itself:

(click to show/hide)

How do backers know if a project will follow through?
Launching a Kickstarter is a very public act, and creators put their reputations at risk when they do.

Backers should look for creators who share a clear plan for how their project will be completed and who have a history of doing so. Creators are encouraged to share links and as much background information as possible so backers can make informed decisions about the projects they support.

If a creator has no demonstrable experience in doing something like their project or doesn't share key information, backers should take that into consideration. Does the creator include links to any websites that show work related to the project, or past projects? Does the creator appear in the video? Have they connected via Facebook?

Don't hesitate to request information from a creator. You can always reach out before pledging via the "Contact me" button on the project page.

[Tyefire]

This is funny.

[Sir_Hans]

Human subtlety will never devise an invention more beautiful, more simple or more direct than does nature because in her inventions nothing is lacking, and nothing is superfluous. You cant take a previous invention and compare it to this one. This required thought and a strive for success making this unique in its own way. I can see this invention becoming big and I will put some cash in because it just feels right.

This is funny. Troll is being written all over this. If your so against it get off this fucking page.

There is a difference between being against this and being skeptical. I am also skeptical that this isn't the same person as OP on a different forum account. 

[Tyefire]

What a simple minded accusation. Me and EricCire are not the same people nor do we know eachother. I am just simply here stating that I like this idea and thats all. You on the other hand are here just blurting out dumb shit about stuff you don't even understand. Do some research learn a few things before you decide to say random shit and flame posts.

[Sir_Hans]

If it's in the lens do you have to sit at a certain point to get the images to line up? what happens if you move your head back or forward a little bit, or move your head side to side?

Can you post a link to your patent please, I'd like to get a full explanation on it. Surely you would want to list this after spending such a required sum of money to patent it. (might be a good thing to list on your kickstarter to.) I'm guessing its a design patent, rather than a utility patent?

How is there any depth to the parts of the picture which are only shown once, from one perspective?

I think my questions are valid.

The reason I don't understand his goggles is because they aren't explained very well. The diagrams shown don't really explain his goggles, they only show what happens to light when it hits a multitude of different lenses and mirrors. If I understood everything, why would I be asking questions?

No need to get your panties in a knot.

[zagibu]

You might doubt that he's able to pull it off, but the physics behind it are pretty solid, and I think it could work. As you stated, the lenses obviously won't work for all screen sizes and viewing distances, but I think if it's optimized for desktop computer screens, it could be a pretty successful niche product. Hell I'd buy them for a 3d experience without ghosting that you can enjoy for hours because your eyes don't tire, even if the depth effect was worse than on nVidia's shutter glasses.

[Kirbyy]

I see what Hans is saying, Tyefire tbh you're not helping this case, infact you're making the OP seem less credible because of how defensive you are over a product you have nothing to do with

[cmp]

I don't understand why mention a patent and then dismiss the request to see it like that. Is there a reason why you won't/can't link it?

[EricCire]

I don't understand why mention a patent and then dismiss the request to see it like that. Is there a reason why you won't/can't link it?

Once again cmpxchg8b I feel a sense of racism on this forum. Discrediting me because I'm a black male. We've been through this before when I banned before. When I was called The "N" word. I feel as though if they want to know those things, get a hire a lawyer and find out for them selves. I'm not presenting to a patent. I'm presenting to you 3D goggles. Are you going to ban me again?