Author Topic: War of Northern Aggression  (Read 37206 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Warborn304

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 268
  • Infamy: 139
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Hounds of Chulainn
  • Game nicks: Saint_George_Zimmerman
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #210 on: October 27, 2013, 04:04:58 pm »
+7
I think what's really important is that everybody cease all fighting, immediately. Neutrality really is the best way to conduct Strategus. Personally, I find nothing more exciting than watching my tickets grow and grow and grow until I have TONS of them. Running an internet trade system also gives me quite the fucking adrenaline rush. In the interest of protecting every faction's neutrality, I would like the propose a Calradia-wide Peace Summit in HoC ts on New Year's Eve. Considering that everyone loves HoC, our ts would be the best place to hold this summit because the love for HoC would create a peaceful atmosphere. Together, we can all make a New Year's resolution to forever act in the interest of neutrality and safe trade routes.

(click to show/hide)


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #211 on: October 27, 2013, 04:32:38 pm »
-6
I think what's really important is that everybody cease all fighting, immediately. Neutrality really is the best way to conduct Strategus. Personally, I find nothing more exciting than watching my tickets grow and grow and grow until I have TONS of them. Running an internet trade system also gives me quite the fucking adrenaline rush. In the interest of protecting every faction's neutrality, I would like the propose a Calradia-wide Peace Summit in HoC ts on New Year's Eve. Considering that everyone loves HoC, our ts would be the best place to hold this summit because the love for HoC would create a peaceful atmosphere. Together, we can all make a New Year's resolution to forever act in the interest of neutrality and safe trade routes.

(click to show/hide)

There's no fun in trading and whoring tickets in castles. I'm guessing HoC is the only one that wants to do this.  Go figure.

Actually, that's incorrect. If anything, FRISIA, did worse overall. FCC maintained the 1:1 ratio while Frisia lost .04.

What ratio? If we won nearly all of the battles and captured all of their villages with a better K/D, how did we do worse?
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Warborn304

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 268
  • Infamy: 139
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Hounds of Chulainn
  • Game nicks: Saint_George_Zimmerman
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #212 on: October 27, 2013, 04:54:20 pm »
+10
I think what's really important is that everybody cease all fighting, immediately. Neutrality really is the best way to conduct Strategus. Personally, I find nothing more exciting than watching my tickets grow and grow and grow until I have TONS of them. Running an internet trade system also gives me quite the fucking adrenaline rush. In the interest of protecting every faction's neutrality, I would like the propose a Calradia-wide Peace Summit in HoC ts on New Year's Eve. Considering that everyone loves HoC, our ts would be the best place to hold this summit because the love for HoC would create a peaceful atmosphere. Together, we can all make a New Year's resolution to forever act in the interest of neutrality and safe trade routes.

(click to show/hide)


There's no fun in trading and whoring tickets in castles. I'm guessing HoC is the only one that wants to do this.  Go figure.


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #213 on: October 27, 2013, 05:31:29 pm »
+1
Actually, that's incorrect. If anything, FRISIA, did worse overall. FCC maintained the 1:1 ratio while Frisia lost .04.

what he is saying is a couple of battles do not win the war.
Leader of BS

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #214 on: October 27, 2013, 09:16:33 pm »
+2
What ratio? If we won nearly all of the battles and captured all of their villages with a better K/D, how did we do worse?

The one I maintained in the Great War thread....Frisia finished 1.11 in that.

And, sure Overall K/D maybe, but lost tickets(due to timer) are counted as killed tickets, thus harming your overall K/D(what I record). You lost multiple battles with 300-400 tickets(I think, it might be 4 battles of 200, they are recorded in the same thread, so you can just check), where you didn't USE those tickets and lost.

But, now that FCC has been fighting you guys, they've racked up a pretty good KDR(pure and overall). That's one thing FCC is good at: Using up every ticket.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #215 on: October 27, 2013, 09:58:15 pm »
-7

It was hardly funny.

Why don't you guys just rejoin FCC, because apparently you can't hold a village for longer than a week on your own. nerds.

where you didn't USE those tickets and lost.

Who gives a shit, honestly? We won the war, plain and simple. We lost very few battles even with 1/5 the number of armies. And I admit FCC is winning now. No matter what we say, you shitstains come up with something to argue about.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #216 on: October 27, 2013, 10:01:24 pm »
+3
Who gives a shit, honestly? We won the war, plain and simple. We lost very few battles even with 1/5 the number of armies. And I admit FCC is winning now. No matter what we say, you shitstains come up with something to argue about.

Ummm what?
Frisia and LCO both sent tons of troops at us whether coordinated or not. We decided to focus on defending our best fiefs but very few attacks were made there, then LCO withdrew. We started taking back our fiefs when CC declared our war with frisia was over!

That isn't a win. You didn't do any damage to us and we never asked for peace with you. That being said, you guy didn't even want peace either so really that conflict was basically just on hold but is now going strong.

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #217 on: October 27, 2013, 10:16:16 pm »
-1
We started taking back our fiefs when CC declared our war with frisia was over!

That isn't a win. You didn't do any damage to us and we never asked for peace with you. That being said, you guy didn't even want peace either so really that conflict was basically just on hold but is now going strong.

True, you took back Jelbegi and Vaveyeg (what about New Ayyike? which we captured with about 1400 less troops btw) but I'm saying we won the war because we won more battles. Then the war ended because we joined TCC. So we won.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 10:21:20 pm by Chosen1 »
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #218 on: October 27, 2013, 10:22:16 pm »
+1
True, you took back Jelbegi and Vaveyeg when we were outnumbered (what about New Ayyike? which we captured with about 1400 less troops btw) but I'm saying we won the war because we won more battles. Then the war ended because we joined TCC. So we won.

But thats like saying you joined battle, killed 3 of 30 enemies and then an admin changed the map. I don't really think you can call that a win.

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #219 on: October 27, 2013, 10:40:17 pm »
-1
But thats like saying you joined battle, killed 3 of 30 enemies and then an admin changed the map. I don't really think you can call that a win.

?? We fought you for a good 3 months atleast. And we gained a fief from it and won nearly all of the village and field battles. That's a win. I'm not trying to brag that we won, I'm just saying that we used to do better, and now you guys are kicking our butts. That's fair, isn't it?
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lord_Bernie_of_Voodoo

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 372
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player
  • Remove Great Lances 2015
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Bernie
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #220 on: October 27, 2013, 11:35:22 pm »
+8
let's all take this to NA3, shitlords.

Offline kasMVC

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 608
  • Infamy: 163
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #221 on: October 28, 2013, 12:05:39 am »
+1
Frisia's success was mainly due to the presence of certain mercenaries. True jack has been doing very well and I have been doing decent, but I note that FCC's rosters are largely FCC.

Without MB we will surely lose this war.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #222 on: October 28, 2013, 12:06:43 am »
+6
?? We fought you for a good 3 months atleast. And we gained a fief from it and won nearly all of the village and field battles. That's a win. I'm not trying to brag that we won, I'm just saying that we used to do better, and now you guys are kicking our butts. That's fair, isn't it?

In terms of strat: you don't win unless you capture the hard points of the Castles and Cities. Otherwise, you lost in terms of tickets and overall.

Statistics don't lie. You lost more troops, overall, than FCC, even though you won "all" you field and village battles. Without taking the castles, you not only lost, but were at exactly the same square as the war start. Taking out the hard targets is what nets the win. Villages change hands, Castles don't.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #223 on: October 28, 2013, 12:11:09 am »
-6
honestly Anders, no one gives a shit.
we didn't win because we didn't take their castles? seriously?  :rolleyes:

You're just upset you lost your own castle.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #224 on: October 28, 2013, 12:12:39 am »
+2
we will show you that castles do indeed change hands :) I personally think he has the right of it.. You won the villages because we did not not bother defending them, since they are generally pointless in strat.


Honestly the difference is LCO have not been heavily signing for you guys. They had a very strong Cav crew that were beastly at the drive by knock downs. We do not really field much in the way of cav due to your side heavily into the long poke weapons.

All in all i would say that is the biggest difference between those fights and these.
Leader of BS