Author Topic: War of Northern Aggression  (Read 37199 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jack1

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 231
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jack1_, Abbud_Amari, The_Doc, Gottlob_Kohlman
  • IRC nick: Risen_Jack
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #195 on: October 26, 2013, 10:23:59 pm »
+1
Sorry about that, relit got me riled up accusing me of insulting my friends because he has such a thin skin, really got tired of dancing around that very thin skin in the past.  Would get insulted by the people he wanted to fight over nothing then ignore huge slights by people he didnt want to have to fight.  Not really standing by well he falsely accuses me again.

Assuming that you mean the part were relit "falsly accused" you of insulting dracul,

they literally came into our teamspeak and asked me to personally withdraw my clan from the war, which in turn would mean withdrawing from the Central Confederacy.  If you can't see what's wrong with that, then the diplomacy section is not where you belong

It seems as though relit is, in fact, right in this instance. 

(click to show/hide)
We're all nerds here, so it doesn't really matter.

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #196 on: October 26, 2013, 10:26:02 pm »
0
Assuming that you mean the part were relit "falsly accused" you of insulting dracul,

It seems as though relit is, in fact, right in this instance. 

(click to show/hide)

Woah, hey now, there's no need to be cross with each other here.

Kesh did indeed come to our teamspeak with the intent of getting us to pull out of the war, much like the first war of northern aggression.  I am not particularly offended by this, I can understand the motive and his reasoning
-Artyem, representing Dracul and the Central Confederacy.

(click to show/hide)

You mean this jack1?  Yours was much later after relit started getting super butthurt.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline HarryCrumb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 339
  • Infamy: 68
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #197 on: October 26, 2013, 11:07:25 pm »
+3
What are you making up now?  i havent even been on their ts since this started and I never insulted anyone, i spoke with artyem separately for 2 minutes asking him 1 question and you kept butting in like a 12 year old desperate not to be ignored.  never even talked to anyone else.

relit wishes he could relive his glorious pre-teen years

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #198 on: October 26, 2013, 11:28:17 pm »
0
If you guys would just talk to Dracul or Frisia, I am fairly certain you could come to some agreement. I fail to see how its so horrible that you guys wont even try it.

Would recommend somebody else besides Kesh talks to Dracul, considering he still has not apologized to them.

it does not make any sense to conduct three different diplomacy actions for 1result. How about you all talk to eachother and form a platform and designate a representative. Since I could waste time get two groups to agree and have the third say hell no which makes everything else meaningless. I will take someone elses line... if you do not understand that then the diplomacy section is not for you
« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 02:04:08 am by BaleOhay »
Leader of BS

Offline Artyem

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1218
  • Infamy: 264
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • SODOM Shaman
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul / Raven / SODOMY
  • Game nicks: Artyem
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #199 on: October 26, 2013, 11:32:55 pm »
+4
Using the word "offended" on in the internet is pretty silly, and I should have chosen a different word in place of it.  What I was saying in that post is that it wasn't the action that has me (and to a lesser degree, my clan) unsettled, it's your faction's perennial whining.  Constantly referring to us as backstabbers and cowards despite there never being any official pact or agreement between our factions (or any clan involved in the Confederacy) is a pretty desperate method of buying sympathy.

 Relations between the FCC and every clan in the Confederacy have been damaged in one way or another, and while I consider most of you friends outside of Strategus, I would have hardly called us friendly before the war started.  You've already fought the Ravens and the Frisians in the past, and you really made it seem like we were directly attacking you when we started to fight Acre and HoC.  Taking such matters so personally is an effectively large reason for there being so many people that dislike your faction. 

Regardless, I appreciate the battles, I went from level 20 to level 29 in one night, it was nice.


visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Sordida asinum latronibus sumus

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #200 on: October 27, 2013, 01:15:25 am »
+3
this thread really picked up! Great job everyone!

Offline SP1N

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 585
  • Infamy: 22
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ravens of Valhalla
  • Game nicks: N1PS, SP1N
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #201 on: October 27, 2013, 02:29:03 am »
+6
Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives.
(click to show/hide)

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #202 on: October 27, 2013, 03:35:59 am »
0
we have a lot more different groups that comprise fcc yet whoever does diplomacy speaks for all. It just gets to confusing and difficult to need to schedule around three people. If you try doing it that way will cause insanity.. it is really hard enough to focus and get things done between two people.
Leader of BS

Offline Artyem

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1218
  • Infamy: 264
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • SODOM Shaman
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul / Raven / SODOMY
  • Game nicks: Artyem
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #203 on: October 27, 2013, 03:51:17 am »
+1
we have a lot more different groups that comprise fcc yet whoever does diplomacy speaks for all. It just gets to confusing and difficult to need to schedule around three people. If you try doing it that way will cause insanity.. it is really hard enough to focus and get things done between two people.

You guys also share a teamspeak as far as I know, which probably helps a lot.  We didn't make the Central Confederacy because we're all best buddies who all share some hatred for FCC, we made it because we were interested in participating actively again.  We get along fairly well, but actual communication between clans is somewhat sparse and very loose.  Basic coordination, yes, will you ever find me telling Jack1 what he needs to do on Strategus?  Fuck no.

So yes, we're essentially bad, uncommunicative assholes with too much time and money on our hands.  I'm not exactly thrilled to be locking horns with FCC, but it's better than sitting around not doing anything. 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Sordida asinum latronibus sumus

Offline Sir_Winston_Churchill

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 71
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Frisian Freedom
  • Game nicks: MC_of_Frisia
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #204 on: October 27, 2013, 03:55:59 am »
+4
Slavery.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #205 on: October 27, 2013, 04:19:48 am »
+4
Some music for you as you read the thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jBF1dcTlcM
The rooling council of The Sowth has convened and unaniminously deecided that it is in the best inturest of our sisters for The Sowth to declare war upon The Free Companies of Calradia.

kasis bully: insultin my babies momma, refusin frictions, and not Violatin our sheep.

War goals: End of intelimigence in much of the map. Oh and slaves for those peeples what actually still work.


The Sowth rises up in opporsishuns to the tolurunce of The Canadians Free Companies of Calradia and Queen Victoria Kesh. We can no longer stand (cuz we drunk) and we dont wanna watch the Canadian's relentless effurts to free our slaves. Refugees flee to Canada into tell them of the XP atrocities committed under the Sowth's banner.

We send out this here call to arms to all slave ownin peoples what knows how to read. Stand with us! Stand for incest Slaves!  We will march with any or all of yooze, let us set aside our sisters and unite for slavery more incest!

The Raven Valleyfolks officially calls to arms its ally of old, The KKK. Oaths we have sworn and lynchins we have done side by side, let us march together once again to more slavery.

You lads must be stopped!
« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 04:24:24 am by Matey »

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #206 on: October 27, 2013, 04:32:28 am »
+2
You guys also share a teamspeak as far as I know, which probably helps a lot.  We didn't make the Central Confederacy because we're all best buddies who all share some hatred for FCC, we made it because we were interested in participating actively again.  We get along fairly well, but actual communication between clans is somewhat sparse and very loose.  Basic coordination, yes, will you ever find me telling Jack1 what he needs to do on Strategus?  Fuck no.

So yes, we're essentially bad, uncommunicative assholes with too much time and money on our hands.  I'm not exactly thrilled to be locking horns with FCC, but it's better than sitting around not doing anything.

I understand that arty. However you can not expect us to do three sets of diplomacy, if you guys can not even talk to each other it is to much to ask for us to do it. We will do our best to keep fights in prime time. I hope you all do the same. We will also try and keep the war classy, the trash talking to a minimum etc
I only want to address this one part.

It was funny when every one of your field armies/villages got spawn raped or flag capped and then you had to run to your castles, let alone from a faction 1/5 your size(claim you actually have 6 active players and we have 300 here). The time that you finally came out to take back your villages/attack field armies was after Frisia joined CC, thus proving the statement.

We joined raven dracul, I believe, because there good at playing lightsabers with the lights off+ glow in the dark condoms

I think we were doing just fine in the last war. Defending useless fiefs is well.. useless. I am sure defending fenada showed you the same. Also I think we do just fine in open fields.
Leader of BS

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #207 on: October 27, 2013, 05:23:10 am »
-3
I think we were doing just fine in the last war.

Look in the archive and try to find an FCC victory from the last war.
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lord_Kitazawa_of_Voodoo

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 237
  • Infamy: 18
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Forsvar_KUTT, Forsvar_RAW_and_UnKUTT, Elbatiforp, Special_Agent_Fliegelbaum
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #208 on: October 27, 2013, 11:26:32 am »
+10
I think what's really important is that everybody cease all fighting, immediately. Neutrality really is the best way to conduct Strategus. Personally, I find nothing more exciting than watching my tickets grow and grow and grow until I have TONS of them. Running an internet trade system also gives me quite the fucking adrenaline rush. In the interest of protecting every faction's neutrality, I would like the propose a Calradia-wide Peace Summit in HoC ts on New Year's Eve. Considering that everyone loves HoC, our ts would be the best place to hold this summit because the love for HoC would create a peaceful atmosphere. Together, we can all make a New Year's resolution to forever act in the interest of neutrality and safe trade routes.

(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: War of Northern Aggression
« Reply #209 on: October 27, 2013, 12:47:01 pm »
+1
Look in the archive and try to find an FCC victory from the last war.
(click to show/hide)

tldr you got wrekt last time, and now we are getting wrekt. atleast there is xp going around
Actually, that's incorrect. If anything, FRISIA, did worse overall. FCC maintained the 1:1 ratio while Frisia lost .04.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login