Call of Duty Ghosts (Yes i'm getting it)

[LordBerenger]

no

kinda, but they weren't involved in the beginning

tank or rifle?

a lot

yes, mujahedeens were fighting on one side

of course, ton of snipers everywhere

yes, but knives were used when raping and mutilating the innocent civilians. not to neutralize enemy soldiers from behind like in video games.

Ok thx for honest answers. Not like the evil king above.

But in the case of EA that wouldn't mean more money. And we all know that EA's main goal is money.

Brb gonna put out millions of dollars to make a big AAA game 4 free.

[Vibe]

Brb gonna put out millions of dollars to make a big AAA game 4 free.

Last time they made a big AAA game was like 7 years ago, since then it has just been reskins and map packs that have been sold for 60€ EACH, so please.

[Joseph Porta]

chocolate chip cookie zombies. Screw the whole mp make a standalone of this derpers

[Kafein]

Brb gonna put out millions of dollars to make a big AAA game 4 free.

What about brb gonna spend a couple thousand to make a game with greater quality and originality than AAA that will be sold 5 bucks per copy without DRM ?

[Prpavi]

What about brb gonna spend a couple thousand to make a game with greater quality and originality than AAA that will be sold 5 bucks per copy without DRM ?

Nobody is enabling Activision and EA to do the things they are doing but the players themselves.

Yes, all this DLC bs started to gain mometum with the console crowd (remember on PC we had things called expansions and they used to be free), pay for this pay for that mentality, microsoft points for avatar hats all that bullcrap, people bought it. Yes it is easy to say console crowd spoiled gaming... but when the same shit started to happen on PC people did the same thing like they do on consoles, just look at Steam badges and the ammount of money people spent on trading cards just so they could have a custom emoticon or some extra profile customisation options. Sure you could say it's to support Steam and Gabe, which is the same kind of fanboyism displayed by xbox vs ps3 debate crowd.

So quit the PC elitism bullcrap and stop trying so hard to discredit consoles and blame them for everything bad that is happening in gaming and PC as the great savior. We need both systems and I've owned PS and Xbox and will own a console again one day, the only thing currently preventing me is money, I chose to spend it on other things dear to me, but as soon as this will pop on top of my priority list I shall own a PS4.

[Vibe]

just how did Prpavi decypher Kafeins post (or any of the recent ones) as PC elitism

[Nightmare798]

a lot

Man thats just typical style of us fighting.

How to win the battle the US way:

Step 1. Airstrike!

Is everyone dead?

>YES: win!

>NO: repeat step 1.

[Xant]

You say the dumbest things, Nightmare.

[Nightmare798]

You say the dumbest things, Nightmare.

Oh yeah? Watch a few documents about war history. You will see just how much americans love to bomb everything to shit.

[Xant]

Because bombs are effective but costly, and Americans have the money...? But Americans or not, they aren't exempt from the well established rules of war, such as the fact that you need infantry to hold and capture territory.

[Prpavi]

just how did Prpavi decypher Kafeins post (or any of the recent ones) as PC elitism

the fact that Kafeins post was about Kickstarter and other sililar indie projects happening maily on PC and more the fact that we are discussing Call of Duty and everybody massively shitting on it, which is for the last 5 years at least a console shooter, they sell only 5% of every CoD for the PC, the rest goes to Xbox (over 50%) and PS3, small percentage for Wii.

I'm sorry if I misuderstood Kafeins and other posts but I kinda got the f console vibe from the topic. My rant still stands for the people that do think that way 

[Nightmare798]

Because bombs are effective but costly, and Americans have the money...? But Americans or not, they aren't exempt from the well established rules of war, such as the fact that you need infantry to hold and capture territory.

I know, that bombs themselves are not enough.

I was rather referring to how they love to talk about their elite US marines and their pwning infantry, and then they go and bomb the hell out of any place they want to capture, instead of using their famous elite infantry forces to clean up the city of hostiles, rather than everyone.

[Xant]

I know, that bombs themselves are not enough.

I was rather referring to how they love to talk about their elite US marines and their pwning infantry, and then they go and bomb the hell out of any place they want to capture, instead of using their famous elite infantry forces to clean up the city of hostiles, rather than everyone.

Out of curiosity, how old are you?

[Nightmare798]

Out of curiosity, how old are you?

why do you want to know?

[Xant]

why do you want to know?

Because what you are saying is extremely childish. Real life is not a video game. Elite infantry or not, you don't risk their lives just because "they're elite." In fact, that's a reason not to risk their lives.