EU4

[Strudog]

this thread has been up for 3 months, do you really think the devs will take an interest now?

[Austrian]

this thread has been up for 3 months, do you really think the devs will take an interest now?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Stay strong EU4 brothers, someday the mighty Donkeygod will hear your words!

EDIT: Hugh pic but nice words on it

[Molly]

We barely get fun player count on EU1/2. Spreading the population even thiner would be stupid...

[Dolphin]

We barely get fun player count on EU1/2. Spreading the population even thiner would be stupid...

What is a fun player count is a personal matter

Eu 4 people mostly like 10v10 battles somethin below 30 players.

While people who like 50 v 50 battles are on EU 1 i for one done like this option too much random gank

[Byrdi]

We barely get fun player count on EU1/2. Spreading the population even thiner would be stupid...

That's a very egoistic view that I meet all the time on EU_1.
Who are you to say that we should have one big server when others prefer one or more small servers?

Besides many players left because EU_4 hasn't been here for a while.

[Strudog]

That's a very egoistic view that I meet all the time on EU_1.
Who are you to say that we should have one big server when others prefer one or more small servers?

Besides many players left because EU_4 hasn't been here for a while.

Because the majority prefer a bigger server, if i was a dev i would cater to the majority

[Byrdi]

Because the majority prefer a bigger server, if i was a dev i would cater to the majority

That's what they are doing. Which is their choice, but not letting us know the official reason for keeping EU_4 dead and not putting in a replacement for Meow so we can host new community servers to fill the gap; is just authoritarian.

[Strudog]

i think you know the answer:

\not enough people to support a big server and small server

[Byrdi]

i think you know the answer:

\not enough people to support a big server and small server

There was enough to fill 80-ist in EU_1 get 50 at EU_4 (at worst times) when the server went down. Why would it be any different now?
(Except that many EU_4'er left)

[Strudog]

There was enough to fill 80-ist in EU_1 get 50 at EU_4 (at worst times) when the server went down. Why would it be any different now?
(Except that many EU_4'er left)

Because those aren't the server numbers anymore, normally around 50 peak time, if you split that up you get get to EU4's rather than one Eu1, the only reason for the sudden rise in population at the moment is double xp

[Rebelyell]

to  be honet there are player that cant play on big servers so eu4 is not that bad idea

but on other hand devs probably dont want to host server for 30 players in crpg pop

[Riddaren]

Most people who used to play on EU_4 play less cRPG now (myself included) and a few have stopped playing entirely.

EU_1 is not the only server to which EU_4 players have moved. There is EU_3, EU_2 and DTV.
So it's not like the population would drastically decrease on EU_1 if we got a small battle server with a maximum of 30 players.

Who knows, maybe the overall player amount would increase instead. Atleast I believe so.

[Adamar]

Most people who used to play on EU_4 play less cRPG now (myself included) and a few have stopped playing entirely.

Yup Yup.
I'm having a slight visual pause every second in EU 1, and that ruins everything so Im staying off server most of the week. I've never had such issues in EU 4, that's why I'd like to have that server back specifically.

[Pestdoktor]

random-music-bump

[Leo_the_clumsy]

give it baaaacccck