Poll

What you think about double XP for strat battles?

get double XP or fuck Strategus
29 (44.6%)
cheater, but the double XP is a good idea
11 (16.9%)
shitty idea, but if only for one month, why not
6 (9.2%)
attention whore but this time he is really right
3 (4.6%)
potatoes but double XP sounds cool
16 (24.6%)

Total Members Voted: 64

Author Topic: 1/3 rule or double XP petition for strat battles throughout September + Poll  (Read 1718 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
-1
Just let me remind you this:

hmmmm....

We have retreated to our castles and cities, hoping that someone will attack them. Did not happen. We did not have any exconomy or troop rectuitment at the time u mention....

Bullshit meter went sky high.  Recruited daily over half what you lost in uxhal with each daily attack just from your members inside that fief alone.  Whole siege plan had to work around the massive recruitment rate inside the city.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Strudog

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 922
  • Infamy: 361
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • A Dog
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Britfag
  • Game nicks: Strudog
-2
every grey poll is the same, all the options are the same but written differently.  :rolleyes:
This is the internet.
Men are men
Women are men
Little girls are FBI agents.
Those are the rules no?

Offline Erasmas

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The crows had come
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Erasmas_the_Grey
+3
every grey poll is the same, all the options are the same but written differently.  :rolleyes:

it really required an extremely bright mind - like yours - to discover this carefuly crafted plot  :rolleyes:   
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vovka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1174
  • Infamy: 240
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
  • Game nicks: Druzhina_Vovka
  • IRC nick: Vovka
+1
Or maybe its:  greys abused the rule 1st, drz abused the rule second, lets not start fixing it when their enemy's use it for a change?

Funny how greys used it themselves, then drz used it, and when mercs use it, it became a problem that has to be fixed right now.
http://forum.melee.org/strategus-general-discussion/why-the-current-battle-system-needs-a-fix-%28in-big-battles%29/msg736533/#msg736533
just slightly modify the rule "u need equal or higher than 1/3 of the defenders army but not more than 1600"
So if owners want safe gold from upkeep huge armies in 1 fiefs he risky to loose all army if attackers take flags
and its not 1st time when we suggested it
if u check battles it 1 month before hre attack drz

I agree what if dev change dat rule right not merc will be completely fucked and not only mercs btw
but it would be nice to remove/edit that rule and announce the date of its inception such as a month or two
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Harpag

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 914
  • Infamy: 263
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • jebać merców
    • View Profile
  • Faction: UIF
  • Game nicks: Harpag_the_Grey

...I agree what if dev change dat rule right not merc will be completely fucked and not only mercs btw...


So what? Is that supposed to be a reason to keep a shitty system. No... Vovka traitor lol
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vovka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1174
  • Infamy: 240
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
  • Game nicks: Druzhina_Vovka
  • IRC nick: Vovka
+2
So what? Is that supposed to be a reason to keep a shitty system. No... Vovka traitor lol
i mean system must be changed but with announcement atleast 2-3 weaks before  :P
but who cares if At fifteen, I had the will to  learn ; at thirty, I could stand ; at forty, I had no  doubts ; at fifty, I understood the heavenly Bidding ;  at sixty, my ears were opened ; at seventy, I could  do as my heart lusted without trespassing from the  square.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Corsair831

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1168
  • Infamy: 616
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
+2
every grey poll is the same, all the options are the same but written differently.  :rolleyes:

welcome to polish politics

"vote option 1 for corrupt bastard"

"vote option 2 for corrupt bastard"

"option 3 ... corrupt bastard ..."

:D
I 10/10'd cRPG on moddb.com!

Do your bit for our community and write a 10/10 review for cRPG on http://www.moddb.com/mods/crpg !

Offline Erasmas

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The crows had come
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Erasmas_the_Grey
+1
welcome to polish politics

"vote option 1 for corrupt bastard"

"vote option 2 for corrupt bastard"

"option 3 ... corrupt bastard ..."

:D

close enough  :D  But that shouldn't stop u from voting  :D
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
+2
welcome to polish politics

"vote option 1 for corrupt bastard"

"vote option 2 for corrupt bastard"

"option 3 ... corrupt bastard ..."

:D

Fixed that for you
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy