Poll

Prohibit the catapult for the defenders

No
63 (52.9%)
Yes
56 (47.1%)

Total Members Voted: 118

Author Topic: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders  (Read 8457 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GRANDMOM

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 920
  • Infamy: 140
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GRANDMOM
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #105 on: August 05, 2013, 05:41:47 pm »
0
(click to show/hide)

Dear Sir Cymro,

We arent interessted in peace negotiations since we have little to gain from it, strategically your position in this war is in the gutter, even if you have managed to defend Alburq castle a couple of times. You have still lost 3 cities, 1 castle and no less than 10 villages. Your trade is weak if not noneexisting.  Your lands have been ripped apart, divided, surrounded and you are pinched between several enemy clans, you cant hardly travel outside of your fiefs, your at war with 8-12 (guessing)clans and your former allies/vasalls are leaving you as we speak.

Our position is different, we are friends with those clans that are at war with you, we help them, we have free trade, we have enough armies and constantly buying/grinding new ones, we are organised on the map like a machine, we have an overflow with gold and gear. If we need to, we could strike with 10 armies in 4 days more or less anywhere in the east, and then come with reinforcements a couple of days later.

And Cymro, if circumstances were different I think you and me could get along just fine on the same side of this war, but thats not the situation now, and if we should sign that peace we would have been trashed at the first oppurtunity by your clan. So no, we are happy with the situation and our many friends in this war.

As for the sieges, well like I said those two examples were merely to point out how an agreement could be done, others could try and find solutions for it, those with more experience.

Strudog, I dont think the wooden walls not being able to brake is intentional either - meaning this is just something that isnt ready yet, much like for example the weaponrack situation. The key isnt the catapults here, the key is balancing the game ourselfs until devs do it properly later - like we have done with the weaponrack. And by the way, u shot me while I was jumping from a siegetower last siege, do your stones pass thure people or do they just stop when hitting for example old granmas? Nice shot by the way :)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


We're working on something cooler than a blog.

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #106 on: August 05, 2013, 06:00:58 pm »
+2
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 10:04:27 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #107 on: August 05, 2013, 06:20:01 pm »
+1
A castle and a village, don't be greedy! But i am not without conscience, the people of Jayek deserve to be reunited with their brothers in Alburq... SO i think everyone benefits if you erm... lend me Alburq just until the peasants can adjust...

I took on the mantle of Alburq due to Sili not wanting it :3

Offline Zaalback

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 254
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Zaalback
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #108 on: August 05, 2013, 06:32:32 pm »
-1
Nah, mainly on the field  :wink:
A strategy like this takes heavy losses in the start, but it's paying off now.

Free Peasants of Fisdnar    1,757       Apostates : Fisdnar       1,061
Wolves    1,830       Apostates       351
Grey Order    2,162       Apostates : Alburq Castle       483
Apostates       985    Die Normannen       1,447
Wolves    2,059       Apostates : Alburq Castle       747
Wolves    2,212       Apostates : Alburq Castle       505

I don't get the point , all those victories are meaningless , remember that you're getting sieged , that's to say you're on an inferior position in this war. There's no way to bragg about a victory against some half-geared random players, i'd rather say that your performance was bad there. Same thing last night, it was a roster issue... not even related to your fighting-talent or whatever. You should rather copy-paste your score in the 20 last landbattles against Greys for example , or maybe the perfs in your latest sieges ? Oh i forgot  ....you didn't sieged anything yet :p.
Anyway those scores ain't good enough for the best faction of the game imo.
Dive back to Wercheg for example :/

I still loving you guys, but sometimes i can't get the reason of your pride in this war
...
« Last Edit: August 05, 2013, 06:39:42 pm by Zaalback »

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #109 on: August 05, 2013, 06:44:43 pm »
+2
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 10:04:19 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline GRANDMOM

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 920
  • Infamy: 140
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GRANDMOM
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #110 on: August 05, 2013, 06:48:29 pm »
+1
Think Zaalback is refering to this battle:

Apostates       985    Die Normannen       1,447
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


We're working on something cooler than a blog.

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #111 on: August 05, 2013, 06:58:17 pm »
+2
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 10:04:13 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline VVarlord

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 176
  • Infamy: 86
  • cRPG Player
  • Simmer down and pucker up
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Waylander
  • Game nicks: Waylander_VVar
  • IRC nick: Boldkorn
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #112 on: August 05, 2013, 08:17:53 pm »
+3
Where is Kinngrimm and his good sense when you need him to find a diplomatic route...


visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Zaalback

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 254
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Zaalback
Re: Prohibit the catapult for the defenders
« Reply #113 on: August 05, 2013, 09:19:57 pm »
0
Bah calling any victory meaningless is absolute trash. Every victory means something, no matter how small or large it is. This just shows we are actually starting to fight back.

Zaalback the pride in this war is non-existant, it's a game if you take pride over winning on that or having pride you are in a war it's just sad and petty.

Maybe "pride" is not a right term for you as you're reading it at its first meaning  :rolleyes:. To simplify it, let's say that there's no point to bragg about victories or whatever according to your situation in this war.  :!:
Whatever, we'll see how you can impress on the battlefield in the future days  :) Good luck lads.