Well, it is also known that, to use windows applications and games on linux that have not made to fit with linux too need applications like wine etc. to function.3rd party programs to run my shit means inconvenience ->I dislike it
Again, you don't dislike Linux, you dislike the fact that your software doesn't run on it. And I agree. For gaming, Windows is still required. And for a lot of special purpose software, too. Another problem is hardware, btw. A lot of hardware still doesn't run or runs only poorly under a Linux OS. Because hardware vendors generally don't care about Linux, and somebody else must then do their job and write drivers for their products. And they might not be interested in all of the features, so they only implement what they need.
Whatever man.The basics of what Iam disliking remain the same.
Not at all. Somebody that sits into a Porsche Cayenne with Diesel engine, then decides he dislikes Diesel engines because the steering wheel is not to his taste draws the same conclusions as you. Of course, you are not completely to blame, because the term Linux is commonly misused, and people coming from Windows have a strange opinion of what an operating system consists of, something they are not entirely to blame for, because Microsoft themselves seem to share it.
This is not how the human brain works.
Are you saying my brain is not human?
Well tbh the desktop environment is a very important thing when you want to use a computer. Look at all the hate windows 8 is getting. I'm writing this from a new laptop running 8 and I personnally think it's not that bad if you take the time to learn the interface. That even though they have made some real improvements. Then again, Linux distros (especially the proprietary ones) have been on average leagues ahead of Microsoft in terms of performance and ease of use (especially advanced features and fixing it when it doesn't work) for the expert user.
I agree. The desktop environment is important. The problem is that people dislike alternative environments not because they are inferior, but because they are unfamiliar. This is the second reason (hw and sw compatibility being the first one) why Linux isn't more popular, because the desktop environments and other key elements of interacting with the computer (filesystem tree, a.k.a. where is my C: drive? etc.) are different to what they are used to. It doesn't matter that they might even be better, as long as they are different from how Windows does things, they are "unusable".
I once had a client that asked me to "install Linux" on his computer. I installed one of the more popular distributions, but he immediately disliked it, and asked me to change things to make it "better". Fortunately, software contained in Linux distributions is often open source and even besides that usually allows you to customize it heavily. I implemented some of the changes he required, but was then forced to reinstall Windows, because he discovered that a .exe File he downloaded from somewhere "didn't work on Linux". Basically, he wanted a Windows that doesn't cost anything.
